CarrollVermin
IE Verminator
- Messages
- 877
- Reaction score
- 58
I think there was miscommunication with athletics department people. Basically, from what I was told, when they asked when hearing would occur they got answers like "immediately after the investigation completes" or "very quickly after we have all the facts." Which to them meant it would be resolved in a couple days to a week after the official close of the investigation. Which appears to be an incorrect assumption.
At this point, I'm hoping we get clarity on the players involved in short order and get reinstatement/expulsions done and move on with the season. And then don't make any formal release of findings or other announcements until we've gone through a long collaborative effort with the NCAA to find out what games (if any) need to be vacated... and hopefully that announcement comes in March-June.
We all have to realize there are two components here:
1. The academic component, where honor committees have to determine both culpability and punishment of individuals. This has little to no intersection with the athletics save whether a student is separated from the university or eligible to participate.
2. The athletics aspect, which is parsing the information they've got and determining how this applies to past games, etc. This is all handled by the compliance/athletics department.
The surprising part, to me, is that no one has any idea when this honor committee meets...which is baffling. Seems like there would be someone on that campus that can answer that.
The second part of that is, what is their process? Do they hear the complaint against the athletes and render a decision, or do they hear the complaints, take some time to contemplate action, and then render a decision in the future. Two distinct process that have much different time lines, no?
