<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>BK on Cowherd: Academic hearings should be happening hopefully this week.</p>— Irish Sports Daily (@ISDUpdate) <a href="https://twitter.com/ISDUpdate/status/509368711342723073">September 9, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
He said school started three weeks ago, and that "these things" take three weeks to get through... so he thinks it's right on schedule.
"The hearings should be happening hopefully this week."
"The hearings should be happening hopefully this week."
"The hearings should be happening hopefully this week."
If it's right on schedule why did he speculate if he got players back before the Michigan game they would play?
I hear they meet on the second tuesday of this week.
That's weird. I hear they meet on the 3rd Tuesday following the vernal equinox, but only if Mercury and Venus are in alignment with the Sun.
They ought to just simplify things and schedule an annual meeting on February 29th.
You are all wrong. They meet tri-annually at a secret country mansion in Colorado, known as The Meadows.
There are three groups involved here. The administration isn't the one causing the holdup. That would be the faculty and the students. The committee itself is made of those folks.Does the Admin work overtime at Notre Dame? Maybe they should have skipped the game like the suspended players had to in order to get done with all of this.
There are three groups involved here. The administration isn't the one causing the holdup. That would be the faculty and the students. The committee itself is made of those folks.
If it's right on schedule why did he speculate if he got players back before the Michigan game they would play?
The honesty committee didn't even exist when this whole thing started, and that's part of the problem. It's not like there was a committee out there setting the timeline from day one. They had to create that committee in the first place.I would have assumed that the accused parties would have been made aware of a timeline to get the result of this process. This would have eliminated a lot of confusion for the coaching staff/players/fans/etc. It doesn't sound like that is the case at all. It appears that the only people in the know is the honesty committee itself.
There are three groups involved here. The administration isn't the one causing the holdup. That would be the faculty and the students. The committee itself is made of those folks.
Maybe. I'm just saying it's more likely that it's the group of faculty and students rather than administrators. I'm not saying "everyone is innocent," but rather trying to steer any blame towards the folks actually pulling the strings with this particular process.I was with you last week but I'm done defending the university now. We literally heard BK say the same thing like 10 days ago. So either he is badly misinformed, he was lied to, someone is pussyfooting around, or someone is actively holding this up.
The honesty committee didn't even exist when this whole thing started, and that's part of the problem. It's not like there was a committee out there setting the timeline from day one. They had to create that committee in the first place.
Maybe people just stopped caring to some extent? We whooped on Michigan without these guys and at this point we don't really need them until October 4 at the earliest. This thing could go three more weeks and there's really no football impact.I am just amazed at how eerily quiet it has been. Nobdy close to the process is clarifying what the status is. Nobody close to somebody involved in the process is speculating on things. Nobody, far away from the process is guessing what's going on anymore. No updates on what the (5) are doing with their time. Early "sources" have been proven wrong so they've gone quiet. Phillip's tweets are all that we have gotten...what they mean is anyone's guess. It's too quite...which I equate to bad news on the horizon.
Maybe people just stopped caring to some extent? We whooped on Michigan without these guys and at this point we don't really need them until October 4 at the earliest. This thing could go three more weeks and there's really no football impact.
The honesty committee didn't even exist when this whole thing started, and that's part of the problem. It's not like there was a committee out there setting the timeline from day one. They had to create that committee in the first place.
Maybe. I'm just saying it's more likely that it's the group of faculty and students rather than administrators. I'm not saying "everyone is innocent," but rather trying to steer any blame towards the folks actually pulling the strings with this particular process.
Because he would play them, and he hoped to speed up the process.
Doesn't it seem like the reality is some bad crap went down? My TOTAL guess is something along these lines:
(1) the initial wave of good news was a few of the players insisting that they hadn't gotten anyone to write a paper for them.
(2) the next wave of good news was this being "confirmed" by the investigation.
(3) However, the investigation turned up a lot of bad stuff, including at least one of the payers actually cheating and others involved in other honor code violations related to the cheating.
(4) The fact-gathering part of the investigation closed, but a lot of analysis had to be done, because there was a lot going on.
(5) Once it became pretty clear that no one was 100% innocent, and that there was some potentially serious issues to be addressed, ND was not going to expedite the process; the emphasis was looking thorough so they could have a hand in setting their own punishment.