According to S&P+, Wake is no joke and two of our hardest remaining games are yet to be played. It's not the only ranking system in the world, but paints a different picture than the one I had in my head for how the rest of the season could go.
S&P+ is great because it's so granulated that you can compare specific units against each other for a good picture of match-up advantages. But the downside of that granulation--of trying to measure the "success" of each individual play--is that it sometimes loses sight of the forest for the trees. That's why I generally prefer
FEI for its predictive power:
ND - 3rd overall, 4th offense, 15th defense.
WF - 34th overall, 52nd offense, 33rd defense.
UM - 10th overall, 24th offense, 20th defense.
Navy - 32nd overall, 31st offense, 50th defense.
Stanford - 18th overall, 13th offense, 71st defense.
Furthermore,
S&P+ rates our rushing attack as the 2nd best in the nation. The
run defense ranking for our next four opponents is 45th, 84th, 15th, and 90th, respectively. So barring some fluke circumstance, I don't see how WF, UM or Stanford are going to stop us from running away with the game. Navy could be uncomfortably close, but I expect that Elko will pass the triple-option test with ease.