Rumored Violations

Irish#1 · Sep 29, 2014

koonja said:
Speaking of Fuller, excuse me while I brag. Who was it that told both TP and NDinLA and said Fuller >>>> Brown all day back in August, when they were saying how Brown was going to break out?

Yours truly!

Need some BenGay for that arm?

Remember even A blind squirrel gets lucky every now and then. Lol

ACamp1900 · Sep 29, 2014

Irish#1 said:
Need some BenGay for that arm?

Remember even A blind squirrel gets lucky every now and then. Lol

but what about B blind squirrel? Or even C, or D?

Huntr · Sep 29, 2014

scUM Hater said:
I will miss all the rhetoric when this is finally settled.

Dude, this is the Notre Dame football program. Give it 6 months and some other largely self-inflicted and wholly avoidable apocalyptic drama will come around. You'll have plenty of rhetoric, then.

NDdomer2 · Sep 29, 2014

johnnycando said:
Half of all posts in here are yours...

4000!

Actually koon leads with 440. Next closest is is under 275.

Veritate Duce Progredi · Sep 29, 2014

If DD is cleared Thursday evening or Friday evening, does he get game reps? (sorry if this has been asked)

If he does get game reps, over/under 12.5 reps?

RyCo1983 · Sep 29, 2014

Veritate Duce Progredi said:
If DD is cleared Thursday evening or Friday evening, does he get game reps? (sorry if this has been asked)

If he does get game reps, over/under 12.5 reps?

Yes,
Under.

But he's probably gone.

Veritate Duce Progredi · Sep 29, 2014

TheFlyingAlamo said:
Yes,
Under.

But he's probably gone.

Whoa, did I miss actual info? I haven't read any more leaked info? Do we have news on who will likely be booted or are you being pessimistic in an effort to not be disappointed when the verdict is out?

Grahambo · Sep 29, 2014

IrishLax said:
lol yup... all I'm going to say is that 90% of the time when a program gets "burned" it's by:
1. A disgruntled player OR
2. A legal case where stuff comes up in discovery that is an NCAA violation

Methinks we're about to have some pretty disgruntled players... especially if they were under the impression during the early stages that this would be a quickly resolved process where they might take a zero on a paper at worst.

Maybe I should go to Phil about some things going on at work...and let him Tweet about it.

NDinTEXAS · Sep 29, 2014

I know this has probably been said before but in what universe at this point can they find them not guilty and the university come out looking like they did the right thing. I really want them all to come back but they have to know that there will be a ***t storm if they find them not guilty.

ThePiombino · Sep 29, 2014

NDinTEXAS said:
I know this has probably been said before but in what universe at this point can they find them not guilty and the university come out looking like they did the right thing. I really want them all to come back but they have to know that there will be a ***t storm if they find them not guilty.

"Leniency" is the only way. Found guilty, but a lesser punishment of time already served. But let's be honest- that's not the ND way.

Irish#1 · Sep 29, 2014

I have a headache.

Booslum31 · Sep 29, 2014

Irish#1 said:
I have a headache.

Me too...It will be over soon.

RyCo1983 · Sep 29, 2014

Veritate Duce Progredi said:
Whoa, did I miss actual info? I haven't read any more leaked info? Do we have news on who will likely be booted or are you being pessimistic in an effort to not be disappointed when the verdict is out?

Just speaking my gut feeling. If he's found responsible in anything, it's his second academic offense.

PerthDomer · Sep 29, 2014

Offenses dealing with honesty and poor performance are different. One is not a strike vs. the other. The poor grades won't hurt him. (Hell, it might help him. If I were cheating I'd make sure to at least hit a 2.0...)

Circa · Sep 29, 2014

Hey, just a quick note to let everyone know that there has been some form of cheating
<iframe src="//giphy.com/embed/HNlhx9OC0FLGw" width="500" height="252" frameBorder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen mozallowfullscreen allowFullScreen></iframe>

stlnd01 · Sep 29, 2014

At 100%, DD might be the guy you want back the most, at least in the short run, given our youth at WR and the way our defense has been playing.
But what are the odds he's 100% mentally?
KVR's the guy I'd trust most to slide back in right away. And Ishaq might actually have the biggest immediate impact if he can suit up against Stanford.
Realistically I wouldn't count on any of them as a difference maker this weekend. They'd have, what, two days of practice? Why this wasn't wrapped up over the bye week is baffling.
And I agree that at least some of them probably never see the field again for Notre Dame, either by the university's choice or their own. Laying no odds on who, though.

ND NYC · Sep 29, 2014

is mcgibblets taking any vbuck action on outcomes here?

i know where my money is going...ugh

GreenSox04 · Sep 30, 2014

@DaVarisDaniels: Lol

Eeeeeeeeeep

ulukinatme · Sep 30, 2014

Given the choice between KVR and DD, I'd still rather have KVR back. Luke was picked on against Syracuse, would be nice to let him adjust some more and cut down on the reps. I'd also imagine we'd be able to bring even more pressure by locking down the outside with Riggs and KVR.

Cali_domer · Sep 30, 2014

GreenSox04 said:
@DaVarisDaniels: Lol

Eeeeeeeeeep

Hearings next month?

NCND · Sep 30, 2014

Wtf is eeeeeeeeep?

Cali_domer · Sep 30, 2014

NCND said:
Wtf is eeeeeeeeep?

Goggled it and it's a women's high pitch screech

NDTH91 · Sep 30, 2014

NCND said:
Wtf is eeeeeeeeep?

If DaVaris is using his white girl lingo correctly then this is good. My girlfriend uses this language frequently.

"Eeep" (with a varying number of "e"s) shows excitement - akin to "oh boy! Oh boy!"

On the other hand, "meep" (again, with a varying number of "e"s) shows disappointment - akin to "aw, shucks".

I am in no way kidding about this.

koonja · Sep 30, 2014

I checked his twitter, and didn't see the eeeeeeep tweet.

I did see someone ask him if he'd be playing against Stanford, and he replied 'lol'.

NDTH91 · Sep 30, 2014

Ah, maybe that was GreenSox response to the lol tweet then...

Get it together GreenSox

greyhammer90 · Sep 30, 2014

Anything new or have I been right to avoid this thread like the plague?

Emcee77 · Sep 30, 2014

greyhammer90 said:
Anything new or have I been right to avoid this thread like the plague?

Umm, no ...... hammer, this thread has everything. Even spider man memes.

NDdomer2 · Sep 30, 2014

greyhammer90 said:
Anything new or have I been right to avoid this thread like the plague?

well DD tweeted LOL last night.....IT HAS TO MEAN SOMETHING!!!!!!

connor_in · Sep 30, 2014

Emcee77 said:
Umm, no ...... hammer, this thread has everything. Even spider man memes.

b4ae75b0ef447c571af36cd63743207bae63e2917ab90c0bda53afd09fe86c34.jpg

connor_in · Sep 30, 2014

NDTH91 said:
If DaVaris is using his white girl lingo correctly then this is good. My girlfriend uses this language frequently.

"Eeep" (with a varying number of "e"s) shows excitement - akin to "oh boy! Oh boy!"

On the other hand, "meep" (again, with a varying number of "e"s) shows disappointment - akin to "aw, shucks".

I am in no way kidding about this.

Rumored Violations

Livin' Your Dream!

Counting my ‘bet against ND’ winnings

24 Karat Shamrock

Local Sports vBookie

A man gotta have a code

Formerly known as TheFlyingAlamo

A man gotta have a code

Varsity Club Member

Member

The OG "TP"

Livin' Your Dream!

New member

Formerly known as TheFlyingAlamo

Well-known member

Conspire to keep It real

Was away. Now returned.

New member

LET THE BIG DOG EAT!

Carr for QB 2025!

Banned

New member

Banned

Well-known member

koonja

Guest

Well-known member

the drunk piano player

latress on the men-jay

Local Sports vBookie

Oh Yeeaah!!!

Oh Yeeaah!!!