So everyone that wants traditional color schemes and would prefer to not fuq up the tradition of the gold helmet are childish?
I think that might be the other way around.
There are two camps of who are typically terrible at uniform criticism. You see them in most blue blood programs, across most sports, and obviously ND's version are among the most obnoxious.
The first is the "I don't like alternate uniforms" group. Typically older, but not always. Give away's are saying things like "don't change the helmet" or "our colors are gold and blue." This group can sometimes have a decent understanding of uniform history and design but often get trapped in believing their childhood era uniforms are always the greatest.
The second is the "tacky, Red Bull, cargo shorts, Tapped Out t-shirt" group. Typically younger, but not always. Give away's are always wanting or preferring a black or camo uniform and wanting a uniform that's monotone all one color. This group generally has a poor understanding of uniform history and design but are able to think outside the box which can lead to some good ideas.
When you get outside of ND-centric stuff I'd probably agree with the first group (I fall pretty solidly on the traditional side of things for the uniform spectrum) on a lot more uniform issues. But, if they don't like to do concepts so what?
It's like someone saying, "I only like this one kind of pizza and any other kinds of pizza are terrible." Well, good for them but why should a chef care what they think when making new varieties of pizza?
The second group I like because at least they can have a little fun. But, they can't get out of their own way sometimes because they can be a prisoner to a lot of terrible modern design like this:
These extreme groups drown out so much of uniform discussions and it's annoying. The past ~3 pages of this thread are a great example of that.