Sept 9 | Georgia

BobbyMac

Staff & Stuff
Staff member
Messages
33,950
Reaction score
9,294
Tickets are easy to come by if you simply show up. It's true people are willing to sell, but it's untrue that tickets are so difficult to attain. The reason why UGA's, Texas, etc "flood" in is because they only have one shot to make it to campus, so they show up.

Tickets might be easy but right now they are expensive because UGA and casual ND fans are buying the tickets online to guarantee they will have the # of seats they want and have more of an option on where those tickets are.

Yes, you can get into any game if you don't care where you sit and if you need just 1 or 2, I've never got shut out of a game I wanted into but I only had to drive 30 - 100 miles (depending on where I lived) and I knew I could head back to Michigan City where every bar is packed with Catholics watching the game if I struck out. People from UGA aren't going to plan airfare, hotel, rental car and then wing it on the ND/UGA, Bears/Falcons & Cubs tickets. They will pay the extra and have them in hand.

Along those lines, that's what makes all ND games so expensive this time of the year, ND fans unlike any fanbase come from all over the country every weekend. These people don't wing it either. While you'll still most likely to be parked next to Chicagoans, you'll always be parked near people from the Boston to DC region too. It's priceless to see their reaction when you tell them that you grew up 30 minutes away and they've been to all the same big games as you only they had to plan the trip down to the last detail while I rolled out of bed at 8am, decided I wanted to go to today's game and was in the parking lot by 10am... and that includes losing an hour driving into EST.
 

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,695
Reaction score
5,995
Tickets might be easy but right now they are expensive because UGA and casual ND fans are buying the tickets online to guarantee they will have the # of seats they want and have more of an option on where those tickets are.

Yes, you can get into any game if you don't care where you sit and if you need just 1 or 2, I've never got shut out of a game I wanted into but I only had to drive 30 - 100 miles (depending on where I lived) and I knew I could head back to Michigan City where every bar is packed with Catholics watching the game if I struck out. People from UGA aren't going to plan airfare, hotel, rental car and then wing it on the ND/UGA, Bears/Falcons & Cubs tickets. They will pay the extra and have them in hand.

Along those lines, that's what makes all ND games so expensive this time of the year, ND fans unlike any fanbase come from all over the country every weekend. These people don't wing it either. While you'll still most likely to be parked next to Chicagoans, you'll always be parked near people from the Boston to DC region too. It's priceless to see their reaction when you tell them that you grew up 30 minutes away and they've been to all the same big games as you only they had to plan the trip down to the last detail while I rolled out of bed at 8am, decided I wanted to go to today's game and was in the parking lot by 10am... and that includes losing an hour driving into EST.

Question. What's the typical price you'd pay for a big game (UM, USC) if you roll out of bed and decide to go?
 

BobbyMac

Staff & Stuff
Staff member
Messages
33,950
Reaction score
9,294
Question. What's the typical price you'd pay for a big game (UM, USC) if you roll out of bed and decide to go?

Now a days I don't know. I've lived out west since the turn of the century.

When I go now, I get tickets through the Alumni Club or go with friends who have season tickets. That costs me a prime rib dinner at Skips or Heston Bar. Unfortunately, I'm one of those guys who has to plan things out now. Though I can fly nonstop into SB on Allegiant thank goodness.

One of the few games that I didn't go into that I wanted to was the '88 Michigan game. We couldn't find anything cheaper than 2 for something near $100. That was the days of 59,075 capacity. We were in college and longnecks were $1 so that was an obvious economic decision. We headed back to Michigan City (Indiana town 40 miles west of ND) and it was that day that I realized Michigan was, in our part of the world, the #1 rival. Lots of fights, lots of fun. Really one of those moments you never forget.
 

Ndaccountant

Old Hoss
Messages
8,370
Reaction score
5,771
Question. What's the typical price you'd pay for a big game (UM, USC) if you roll out of bed and decide to go?

It varies, based on how close to kick-off you are willing to go before buying as well as where you buy them once in SB. I usually am only at the major games each year and the people that are with me usually are able to find good seats for ~20 - 40% over face. I would imagine it's much less when it isn't USC, Texas, Michigan, etc.
 

dad4aa

Well-known member
Messages
3,754
Reaction score
741
It varies, based on how close to kick-off you are willing to go before buying as well as where you buy them once in SB. I usually am only at the major games each year and the people that are with me usually are able to find good seats for ~20 - 40% over face. I would imagine it's much less when it isn't USC, Texas, Michigan, etc.

I agree with this. If it is a "non-rival, less of a draw" game and you wait until right before or especially right after kick-off I've bought tickets for 50% of face value.
 

RDU Irish

Catholics vs. Cousins
Messages
8,622
Reaction score
2,722
FUGA

My cousin went to the Nebraska game many moons ago and had to buy tickets twice - first set was fake. I didn't feel sorry for him one bit (Husker fan).
 

condoms SUCk

Varsity Club Member
Messages
1,992
Reaction score
391
What would you put the line at? ND+3?

I would say ND +3 or +6, somewhere in that area. (season opening line, obviously the line will change once we see some real action)

If ND gets blow out by 3 TD's in a huge early season game (hype will be unreal) with the new stadium additions and a great night game atmosphere.

Then BK should just clean out his desk that night, no excuse what so ever.
 

BobbyMac

Staff & Stuff
Staff member
Messages
33,950
Reaction score
9,294
What would you put the line at? ND+3?

Just checked the Golden Nugget, <strike>that's where it's at.</strike>

Woooah... Just opened the site on my computer, ND's giving 3. Greg McElroy is at Pawn Stars hocking a NC ring as we speak.
 
Last edited:

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,544
Reaction score
28,990
What would you put the line at? ND+3?

Me personally? ND -6.5. But I'm overly optimistic about the team.

Georgia is only a 14 point favorite -- at home -- against Appalachian State and finished 59th last year in advanced stats.

The biggest underdog ND is at home in any preseason line is 6.5 point to top 5 USC. Realistically, that means if Vegas placed a line right now it'd probably be somewhere south of that number... probably ND +3ish.

EDIT: just looked it up, and Golden Nugget has us favored by 3 points over Georgia... which lines up with logic, but I'm surprised Vegas agrees with me.
 
Last edited:

zelezo vlk

Well-known member
Messages
18,009
Reaction score
5,047
I is dumb. I meant favored by 3, so ND -3. Your confidence is certainly infectious and is making me eager for the videos from fall camp
 

IrishSteelhead

All Flair, No Substance
Messages
11,114
Reaction score
4,686
Sept 9 | Georgia

We headed back to Michigan City (Indiana town 40 miles west of ND) and it was that day that I realized Michigan was, in our part of the world, the #1 rival. Lots of fights, lots of fun. Really one of those moments you never forget.



Said it before on here, the ONLY time I've ever been in a fistfight after college was with a Michigan fan in 2011. They are truly the worst.

Been to 3 games Georgia played in, their fans will be a breath of fresh air. Good people.

*Lax needs to slow down. His optimism for the upcoming season is getting too infectious.
 

BobbyMac

Staff & Stuff
Staff member
Messages
33,950
Reaction score
9,294
Me personally? ND -6.5. But I'm overly optimistic about the team.

Georgia is only a 14 point favorite -- at home -- against Appalachian State and finished 59th last year in advanced stats.

The biggest underdog ND is at home in any preseason line is 6.5 point to top 5 USC. Realistically, that means if Vegas placed a line right now it'd probably be somewhere south of that number... probably ND +3ish.

EDIT: just looked it up, and Golden Nugget has us favored by 3 points over Georgia... which lines up with logic, but I'm surprised Vegas agrees with me.

GN's giving ND 8 against SC.

Me likey.
 

arrowryan

Well-known member
Messages
14,715
Reaction score
8,917
This game is intriguing to me because:

1.) It'll tell us how good our offense is. Georgia returns all 11 starters on defense. If Notre Dame can put 24+ on the scoreboard, I think the offense will be in for a good season.

I think we have enough weapons on offense to spread their defense out and prevent them from keying on any particular player.

2.) It'll tell us how good our running defense is. They have a good 1,2 punch at running back. I think our secondary will be able to keep Eason and the passing game in check; if they can minimize or keep the running game in check, I like Notre Dame's chances.
 

Crazy Balki

Site Assigned Optimist
Messages
7,868
Reaction score
4,477
It's a battle of apparent opposites.

Georgia appears very strong up front on defense, but weak up front on offense.

We appear very strong up front on offense, but weak up front on defense.

Though, surprisingly, I'm a lot more confident that our interior DL gets it together than Georgia's offensive line. They were pretty bad last year and they have to replace a good bit of experience. So I feel more confident that our stellar backs can get it going behind a very good and (supposedly) well conditioned OL, than I am Chubb/Michel get it going behind a questionable one that UGA will most likely field.

Wimbush is gonna have to show that the hype is real. Good news is that even though Eason technically has the advantage in terms of experience, I wouldn't really equate last year as productive experience, because a lot of it was him getting knocked around and picked on by opposing defenses, or just handing it off to Chubb/Michel and praying that works. Sometimes it did, sometimes it didn't. While Eason is more "experienced", I'd say Wimbush is more "developed". Make no mistake though, Eason has the talent, so Wimbush is gonna have to come through for us.
 

Sherm Sticky

The Prophet
Messages
19,321
Reaction score
1,638
It's a battle of apparent opposites.

Georgia appears very strong up front on defense, but weak up front on offense.

We appear very strong up front on offense, but weak up front on defense.

Though, surprisingly, I'm a lot more confident that our interior DL gets it together than Georgia's offensive line. They were pretty bad last year and they have to replace a good bit of experience. So I feel more confident that our stellar backs can get it going behind a very good and (supposedly) well conditioned OL, than I am Chubb/Michel get it going behind a questionable one that UGA will most likely field.

Wimbush is gonna have to show that the hype is real. Good news is that even though Eason technically has the advantage in terms of experience, I wouldn't really equate last year as productive experience, because a lot of it was him getting knocked around and picked on by opposing defenses, or just handing it off to Chubb/Michel and praying that works. Sometimes it did, sometimes it didn't. While Eason is more "experienced", I'd say Wimbush is more "developed". Make no mistake though, Eason has the talent, so Wimbush is gonna have to come through for us.



Weak online you say...Time for Daelin Hayes to make his mark!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2025!
Messages
31,516
Reaction score
17,379
I think this will be an interesting game. Georgia should come in hyped for the big game. We're at home (Which doesn't always mean much with crowd energy...I'll do my best) and will be implementing some new schemes on both sides of the ball, so less opportunities for Georgia to scout us ahead of time. Hopefully we can be pretty vanilla against Temple in week 1 so we don't have to show our hand. I like our chances, but I hope we come out physical and punch them in the mouth.
 

dwshade

Banned
Messages
3,338
Reaction score
123
This game is intriguing to me because:

1.) It'll tell us how good our offense is. Georgia returns all 11 starters on defense. If Notre Dame can put 24+ on the scoreboard, I think the offense will be in for a good season.

I think we have enough weapons on offense to spread their defense out and prevent them from keying on any particular player.

2.) It'll tell us how good our running defense is. They have a good 1,2 punch at running back. I think our secondary will be able to keep Eason and the passing game in check; if they can minimize or keep the running game in check, I like Notre Dame's chances.

Actually they lost one starter on defense Maurice Smith at CB. Strength of defense will easily be their LB's. Weakest part of the team is definitely OL. Eason has a chance to be very good but you don't have to worry about him outside the pocket. Not a threat with his legs.
 

Irish#1

Livin' Your Dream!
Staff member
Messages
44,581
Reaction score
20,031
I think this will be an interesting game. Georgia should come in hyped for the big game. We're at home (Which doesn't always mean much with crowd energy...I'll do my best) and will be implementing some new schemes on both sides of the ball, so less opportunities for Georgia to scout us ahead of time. Hopefully we can be pretty vanilla against Temple in week 1 so we don't have to show our hand. I like our chances, but I hope we come out physical and punch them in the mouth.

UGA will be pouring over WF film as much as ND film looking at Elko's D.
 

dublinirish

Everestt Gholstonson
Messages
27,319
Reaction score
13,088
https://www.saturdaydownsouth.com/g...-stafford-100-times-player-jacob-eason-point/

When you look around the quarterback landscape in the SEC, there isn’t another signal caller who has a higher ceiling than Georgia gunslinger Jacob Eason.

Georgia’s success in 2017 largely depends on how well Eason develops within the offense. The ceiling, like Eason’s talent, is very high, like national championship-high; however, development and progress certainly has to be made in his second season in order for the team to reach that potential. There’s really no quarterback controversy with freshman Jack Fromm, but Eason needs to make strides during his second season in order to keep the starting job.

Many have compared Eason to the great Matthew Stafford, as the two entered Georgia with No. 1 pick-type hype. Stafford lived up to that hype, and Eason has already been projected as the No. 1 pick in 2019, too.

Looking at the numbers, Stafford threw for 1,749 yards, seven touchdowns and 13 INTs, completing over 52 percent of his passes during his freshman season. Eason’s numbers are favorable when compared to Stafford’s, throwing for 2,430 yards, 16 touchdowns and eight INTs, completing over 55 percent.

Although former Alabama signal caller Greg McElroy doesn’t think the uber-talented Eason is a great quarterback yet, he knows he’s more than capable. He also cautions Georgia fans when comparing Eason’s freshman season to Stafford’s first year on the SDS Podcast.

“He’s a great thrower, but he’s not yet a great quarterback, if that makes sense,” McElroy said about Eason. “And that’s okay, because he’s a freshman. There’s a certain level of savvy you have to have at the quarterback spot. And everyone, Georgia fans alike, have said, ‘Oh, look at his numbers against Matt Stafford.’ Okay, but Matt Stafford is 100 times the player Jacob Eason has been to this point. Moving around, being able to negotiate a rush, being able to move throughout his reads and progressions and being able to adjust and be athletic when necessary.

“That’s a reason why Matt Stafford is one of the best quarterbacks in the NFL. Jacob Eason is a terrific thrower of the football, but he still has so many other attributes that need to develop and catch up with his arm in order to become a complete player. But I think he’s capable, but he’s a work in progress at this point. And I think a lot of progress can be made.”

The beautiful thing about Eason is he already has the talent and experience. The other aspects of the position are very coachable. Eason can look at last season and grow from it. The lack of touch should improve, and his ability to read defenses should also. Things like understanding what the offense is trying to accomplish will start to slow down for him in Year 2.
 

arrowryan

Well-known member
Messages
14,715
Reaction score
8,917
Georgia's spring game was on ESPNU this morning and Eason looked pretty unimpressive when I was watching. I know its just a spring game but I was expecting more.
 

BobbyMac

Staff & Stuff
Staff member
Messages
33,950
Reaction score
9,294

When you look around the quarterback landscape in the SEC, there isn’t another signal caller who has a higher ceiling than Georgia gunslinger Jacob Eason.

Georgia’s success in 2017 largely depends on how well Eason develops within the offense. The ceiling, like Eason’s talent, is very high, like national championship-high; however, development and progress certainly has to be made in his second season in order for the team to reach that potential. There’s really no quarterback controversy with freshman Jack Fromm, but Eason needs to make strides during his second season in order to keep the starting job.

Many have compared Eason to the great Matthew Stafford, as the two entered Georgia with No. 1 pick-type hype. Stafford lived up to that hype, and Eason has already been projected as the No. 1 pick in 2019, too.

Looking at the numbers, Stafford threw for 1,749 yards, seven touchdowns and 13 INTs, completing over 52 percent of his passes during his freshman season. Eason’s numbers are favorable when compared to Stafford’s, throwing for 2,430 yards, 16 touchdowns and eight INTs, completing over 55 percent.

Although former Alabama signal caller Greg McElroy doesn’t think the uber-talented Eason is a great quarterback yet, he knows he’s more than capable. He also cautions Georgia fans when comparing Eason’s freshman season to Stafford’s first year on the SDS Podcast.

“He’s a great thrower, but he’s not yet a great quarterback, if that makes sense,” McElroy said about Eason. “And that’s okay, because he’s a freshman. There’s a certain level of savvy you have to have at the quarterback spot. And everyone, Georgia fans alike, have said, ‘Oh, look at his numbers against Matt Stafford.’ Okay, but Matt Stafford is 100 times the player Jacob Eason has been to this point. Moving around, being able to negotiate a rush, being able to move throughout his reads and progressions and being able to adjust and be athletic when necessary.

“That’s a reason why Matt Stafford is one of the best quarterbacks in the NFL. Jacob Eason is a terrific thrower of the football, but he still has so many other attributes that need to develop and catch up with his arm in order to become a complete player. But I think he’s capable, but he’s a work in progress at this point. And I think a lot of progress can be made.”

The beautiful thing about Eason is he already has the talent and experience. The other aspects of the position are very coachable. Eason can look at last season and grow from it. The lack of touch should improve, and his ability to read defenses should also. Things like understanding what the offense is trying to accomplish will start to slow down for him in Year 2.



...and how I read it:

When you look around the completely underwhelming quarterback landscape in the SEC, there isn’t another signal caller whose hype machine is more unwarranted than Georgia gunslinger Jacob Eason.

Georgia’s success in 2017 largely depends on how well Eason pulls his head out of his azz and realizes that he should have followed Richt to Miami. The ceiling, like Eason’s talent, is very high, like lose to Bama in the SEC Championship game-high IF somehow they get by Florida's D and new QB, Malik Zaire; however, development and progress certainly has to be made in his second season in order for the team to reach that potential. There’s really no quarterback controversy with freshman Jack Fromm until after week 2, but Eason needs to make major strides during his second week in order to keep the starting job.

Many idiots have compared Eason to the great Matthew Stafford, as the two entered Georgia with No. 1 pick-type hype. Stafford lived up to that hype, and Eason has already been projected as the No. 1 pick in 2019 because the '19 class sucks and all the good QB's left in the great QB class of '18.

Looking at the numbers, Stafford threw for an embarrassingly low 1,749 yards, just seven touchdowns and threw a completely unacceptable 13 INTs, completing an anemic 52 percent of his passes during his disappointing freshman season. Eason’s numbers are even worse when compared to Stafford’s, throwing for 2,430 yards, 16 touchdowns and a more manageable eight INTs, completing over 55 percent.

Although former Alabama signal caller - turned mentally handicapped handicapper Greg McElroy doesn’t think the uber-hyped Eason is a great quarterback compared to himself, he knows he’s more than capable. He also cautions Georgia fans when comparing Eason’s freshman season to Stafford’s first year on the SDS Podcast.

“He’s a great thrower, but he’s not yet a great quarterback, if that makes sense... but he's good enough on paper to go to South Bend and beat Notre Dame on their home field by 20 points. While we're on the subject, I'd like to tell the thousands of people I had to block on Twitter that you are wrong and I am right.” McElroy said about Eason. “And that’s okay, because he’s a freshman or a sophomore or something. There’s a certain level of savvy you have to have at the quarterback spot. And everyone, Georgia fans alike, have said, ‘Oh, look at his numbers against Matt Stafford, they suck.’ Okay, but Matt Stafford is 100 times the player Jacob Eason has been to this point. Moving around, being able to negotiate a rush, being able to move throughout his reads and progressions and being able to adjust and be athletic when necessary are things he'll have to magically develop so he and the Bulldogs can cover the idiotic line I laid for UGA's game @ ND on Sept 9th.

“That’s a reason why Matt Stafford is one of the best quarterbacks in the NFL. Jacob Eason is a terrific thrower of the football, but he still has a sh!t ton of other attributes that need to develop and catch up with his hype in order to become an averge, game managing, overrated QB like the last 12 Bama QB's. But I think he’s capable on paper of beating Notre Dame by 20 points in South Bend, but he’s a work in progress at this point. And I think a lot of progress can be made.”

The beautiful thing about Eason is he already has the talent and experience of producing like a walk-on in '16 which is masked by the superb RB's he has to bail him and his OC out. The other aspects of the position are very coachable. Eason can look at last season and know that Jake Fromm will be the starter unless he does a 180 from last year's putrid 7TD/13INT debacle. The lack of touch better improve, and his ability to read defenses better appear out of thin air or else. Things like understanding what the offense is trying to accomplish will start to sink in when he's holding a clipboard after week 2's azzwhoopin.
 
Last edited:
Top