Isn't 1st string DL the last place you want to be soft?
Does anyone argue the starting DL looks good though? I'm pretty sure it's a unanimous agreement our starting DL will be good.
It's the 2nd string interior DL that's terrifying. And that's the last position you want to be soft.
Isn't 1st string DL the last place you want to be soft?
I'm talking about DT as a position dumb dumb. Don't be smart, you know what I meant.
Still not as bad as the Rice guy in 2014 who was like "I can't share that" to basic ass questions because he thought it would give a "competitive advantage" to ND and acted like Rice had NFL talent all over the field.
I'm talking about DT as a position dumb dumb. Don't be smart, you know what I meant.
Does anyone argue the starting DL looks good though? I'm pretty sure it's a unanimous agreement our starting DL will be good.
It's the 2nd string interior DL that's terrifying. And that's the last position you want to be soft.
Count me among them. Who am I supposed to be confident in?
Jay Hayes?
Bonner?
Tillery?
D Hayes?
Maybe I'm just being pessimistic. I don't know.
Also, I think you are making quite a bit out of a position, that won't be on the field a lot, barring injury. How many snaps do you think Hinish and MTA are going to get per game? 10-15?
In general, I'd expect this defense to play less snaps per game than last year, as I think they'll get off the field quicker. That's where the edge pressure and Elko's scheme will help.
Let me add, that I do think there will be games where the lack of depth at DT matters, we're not winning 12 games this year, lol. But in general, I think the backup DT concerns are overdone at the moment.
Kelly said they wont be getting 30-40 reps a game, right? So should we expect 20-30 or 10-15 like you said?
On topic, has anyone heard from any good news on Elijah Taylor? I basically am writing him off but if we could survive Georgia and somehow get him back after that, it'd be a big help.
Kelly said they wont be getting 30-40 reps a game, right? So should we expect 20-30 or 10-15 like you said?
With the turnovers our defence is expected to create 30-40 reps will be all the opponents will be running. That would make the rooks starters.
Reading through the last few pages of crazed hype and realizing the meltdowns some of y'all are gonna have this season like:
![]()
I have tried to stay away from commenting
What are you considering crazed hype?
Reading through the last few pages of crazed hype and realizing the meltdowns some of y'all are gonna have this season like:
![]()
What are you considering crazed hype?
Sup, lucci,... did you honestly just ask acamp1900 that question??
![]()
With the turnovers our defence is expected to create 30-40 reps will be all the opponents will be running. That would make the rooks starters.
Uh just FYI the lowest team in FBS last year ran 60 plays per game (Ga Tech, burning that clock). Highest was Baylor at 88
Or are you saying you expect ND to blow teams out?
Sup, lucci,... did you honestly just ask acamp1900 that question??
![]()
Did acamp1900 honestly just go 3rd person????
I'm more worried about the safety play than the interior DL 2 deep...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk