G
Guest
Guest
Except you weren't actually worried about attrition, or that is what you would have said. In fact, you didn't even remember that we had already did what you were hoping for in QB depth.
There isn't a quota, but it's annoying when we have a billion politics threads on here that you are daily making new ones for every random political story you can find. You get like 5 responses and then you are off to pounding the site with your next one. Get a life.
It may annoy you, but I have gotten a lot of positive rep the last few days, and not a single negative rep. Not a single person has IM me in disgust either. Actually this has been one of my better weeks (j/k, I rarely get neg reps but they do inevitably happen). I could screen print my user panel if you would like to confirm, happy to do so. Will have to wait till I get home as work has turned off file sharing site access, I am afraid.
As for the QB depth, I am one of those that believes having a +1 is a positive thing. I realize we have Mr Van Gorder as depth and do not wish to take away his scholarship which I am sure he has earned, and that is not this team's MO. But we have room, and having an insurance policy is not a bad idea. See previous seasons where the board caught fire over Mr. Rees who was our 4th string QB at one point. I think he proves the point that you really cannot have too many QBs.
edit: I just got a neg rep for this post, obstensiblly to prove me wrong after the fact.
Last edited: