Someone needs to empty a clip into his face.
Damn, that's some good lawyering.
I wonder how they got that hearsay in... present sense impression exception? That would explain why Amendola was so concerned about how long they waited to go into the room... no time lapse allowed between the event that happened and the actual statement that was hearsay (in this case, what the older janitor had said he saw).
Regardless, the prosecution appears to have this one locked down. We'll see what tricks Amendola has up his sleeve, but this is some pretty damning testimony.
Oh, and what a disgusting monster Sandusky is, as if we didn't know that already.
IMO. Argued for based on the assumption of fact produced by the Costas interview. The jury already had admissible evidence (the Costas interview) that touched on the subject of the janitor's story, therefore the judge decided it to be admissible in conjunction with Costas interview. At least that's how it seems to have worked, from the limited information we have.
IMO. Argued for based on the assumption of fact produced by the Costas interview. The jury already had admissible evidence (the Costas interview) that touched on the subject of the janitor's story, therefore the judge decided it to be admissible in conjunction with Costas interview. At least that's how it seems to have worked, from the limited information we have.
He's not worth wasting bullets on.