B
Buster Bluth
Guest
I'll take it, considering the tone on this forum would have me believing we're due for MAC-level play for the foreseeable future..
I'll take it, considering the tone on this forum would have me believing we're due for MAC-level play for the foreseeable future..
You are right; it isn't that useful. I experimented with it but I found that the conversation in a particular thread often stopped making sense without the ignored poster's posts. Basically, if the poster is disruptive enough that you want to put him on the ignore list, he is probably a loud enough contributor to the conversation that removing his posts will make the conversation meaningless. So my ignore list currently has zero people on it. That's just one man's opinion though ... maybe other people like it.
Beat them by 18 two years ago. Beat them by 17 last year. MSU probably doesn't have as much talent this year as they have had either of the last two years. I don't think its going to be easy, but I think we win somewhere around 24-14.
Two years ago: Manti
Last year: Manti
I'm not going to get into the "does ND miss Manti this much" argument.
But, I can say for sure the defense is transitioning into their own personality. We'll see if the transformation holds shape on Saturday.
"Holds shape" or takes shape? It's been amorphous so far.
Beat them by 18 two years ago.
Beat them by 17 last year.
MSU probably doesn't have as much talent this year as they have had either of the last two years. I don't think its going to be easy, but I think we win somewhere around 24-14.
We'll know where their heads are when the first play is a handoff up the middle for zero gain.
More first downs: Michigan State
More offensive yards: Michigan State (358 to 275)
Third-Down Conversion: Notre Dame
Time of Possession: Michigan State
Go rewatch the game, it was a weird one. George Atkinson's kick returns had a lot to do with it.
I thought 2012's game was a lot like Oklahoma. Took a lead and juuuuust held onto it in a defensive showdown. Notre Dame was 1-14 on third downs.
That score is probably an accurate one (in my opinion). Notre Dame is definitely more talented, but Michigan State has a verrrry impressive defense whose linebackers will be terrors on Saturday. They do match up very well with Notre Dame.
I think the easiest way to say it is that Diaco/Martin/Kelly will certainly have to earn it with a fine gameplan. Dantonio is a fantastic head coach, albeit with an offensive coordinator who drove Ohio State fans wild when he was there.
I just don't think MSU will be able to move the ball. Their offense is SO boring, it plays into our philosophy on D perfectly. They have no problem doing the run-run-pass-punt (the ol' Willingham 1-2). They barely moved the ball on us last year, and I think it will be a similar game this year.
Originally Posted by irishfan View Post
I just don't think MSU will be able to move the ball. Their offense is SO boring, it plays into our philosophy on D perfectly. They have no problem doing the run-run-pass-punt (the ol' Willingham 1-2). They barely moved the ball on us last year, and I think it will be a similar game this year.
Their schedule has been easy so far though. They could certainly open it up this game.
I will say this much.. you talk about the mother of all swing games... I don't think I can remember a game that potentially impacted the outlook of the season so drastically...
if MSU wins this game, would anyone really argue against 6-6 being possible?? If they win, the BCS is still possible... at least for now...
This team is flat out too talented not to put a solid game together in four games... I expect things to come together in a big way...
Go Irish
I want more of this:
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/Htr2UloK-5A?feature=player_detailpage" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p><a href="https://twitter.com/search?q=%23NotreDame&src=hash">#NotreDame</a> is one of 6 teams in the top 20 of both passing attempts and sacks allowed. That'll be tested against MSU: <a href="http://t.co/dduLI8o8zz">http://t.co/dduLI8o8zz</a></p>— Dan Murphy (@BGI_DanMurphy) <a href="https://twitter.com/BGI_DanMurphy/statuses/380415339256741888">September 18, 2013</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
What a weird stat. I mean you'd expect a team with a lot of pass attempts to allow more sacks. I'm surprised there aren't more teams in the top 20 in both categories.
Our pass protection has been generally really good this year, I've thought.
Whoa! Who hacked your account?