IrishJayhawk
Rock Chalk
- Messages
- 7,181
- Reaction score
- 464
Cmon. It's way more fun to assume she had a nervous breakdown because her balloon was popped.
Agreed.
Cmon. It's way more fun to assume she had a nervous breakdown because her balloon was popped.
Unless the balloon was filled with pepper spray, residue spray on a balloon isn't going to cause that kind of reaction.
I agree in concept, but China isn't our country. The NBA is an American institution. We are guests when we go to other countries and we are going there to spread the image of the NBA. It's completely different than responding to domestic issues. Not playing in China doesn't do anything to respond to their human rights issues, nor does it effect the NBA. Domestic issues have direct implications on their brand within the US. I don't mean this as an endorsement of their decision (although I do agree with it), rather I'm just pointing out that the two situations are apples and oranges in my opinion.
"We" as a nation are not sending the NBA to China, the NBA is going on its own in the hopes of making money. If the NBA doesn't feel they could make money doing what is effectively marketing their product they would not go to China.
Question, did you feel the same about international sports boycott of South African?
I see both sides in his quote on ESPN. His statement was incredible, and displays the mindset we should all strive for IMO.
I see both sides in his quote on ESPN. His statement was incredible, and displays the mindset we should all strive for IMO.
Yup.
It wasn't that his original quote wasn't complete, it was that "The Undefeated" only used half of the quote, in order to skew Jordan's words.
It wasn't that his original quote wasn't complete, it was that "The Undefeated" only used half of the quote, in order to skew Jordan's words.
I get it, and I'm not surprised... My Yep was to Jordan's overall stance on things...
I believe the actual article at The Undefeated was correct from the beginning. The thing that was incomplete was @TheUndefeated's Tweet.The Undefeated article had the full quote now, maybe they changed it.
I believe the actual article at The Undefeated was correct from the beginning. The thing that was incomplete was @TheUndefeated's Tweet.
International sports are, well..... International...
The Royal "we", dude. I'm not saying you packed up Kevin Durant's draws and flew him personally to China.
Sorry dude, I didn't know you were employed by the the NBA or were an owner or well, you know, part of the "we" Royalty.
The soft bigotry of low expectations.
Cringe
Not if it's race-based. When it's framed as white people as the givers and black people as the receivers, it's explicitly racist. The noble goals you're describing would also allow for successful black people to help out poor white people, white people helping white people, and black people helping black people. As it's structured, this is built around guilt, not generosity.At a local level, I think something like this could be a good thing. It allows people to see the good side of each other, while addressing some of the needs of others. It's completely voluntary, and it brings different people together. On a large scale, it would be a GIANT conduit for abuse.
At a local level, I think something like this could be a good thing. It allows people to see the good side of each other, while addressing some of the needs of others. It's completely voluntary, and it brings different people together. On a large scale, it would be a GIANT conduit for abuse.
It can change local perceptions of each other. Change enough local perceptions and the national perception is logically bound to follow. People would have to treat it like Craigslist, though. It could be used for a lot of bad juju.
The jokes write themselves.
The jokes write themselves.