Feminism

wizards8507

Well-known member
Messages
20,660
Reaction score
2,661
LOL, I was thinking more along the lines of missionary, doggie style, going down south, etc.
I think it was girl-on-girl, so they're pretty limited in that regard.

Ever heard of alcohol?
Read the article, that's not what happened. She's conversational with the "victim." The "victim" decided after the fact that it wasn't consensual. That's not rape.
 

Irish Insanity

Well-known member
Messages
9,885
Reaction score
584
That's the way it is on college campuses now.

May I kiss you? Yes.

May I unbutton your pants? Yes.

May I unhook your bra? Yes.

...and on and on and on. It's laughable that you can find out you "raped" somebody after the fact.
Oxford: Anti-Rape Activist Resigns After Raping Somebody

"At this year’s NUS black students' conference, I had sex with someone. The other party later informed me that the sex was not consensual. I failed to properly establish consent before every act. I apologise sincerely and profoundly for my actions."
I didn't read the story, but here in Michigan they are pushing a 'Yes means Yes' law thru to replace the current 'No means No.' If neither party doesn't says 'no' it's still not consensual. Both must verbally say 'Yes.' One person failing to do so can mean lack of consent.
 
B

Buster Bluth

Guest
Read the article, that's not what happened. She's conversational with the "victim." The "victim" decided after the fact that it wasn't consensual. That's not rape.

Read your comment, you spoke broadly.

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2025!
Messages
31,516
Reaction score
17,382
Anita Sarkeesian's name always reminded me of now former USC coach Steve Sarkisian. There's something in those names...and it's USC week, so **** her.
 

gkIrish

Greek God
Messages
13,184
Reaction score
1,004
I fail to see how requiring an affirmative "yes" changes anything at all other than by creating more awkwardness and potentially deterring sex as a whole.

It seems to me that the underlying issue is the credibility of the alleged victim and the accused. If a woman decides she wants to falsely accuse someone, this does nothing.

If a woman was in fact raped, any requirements are pointless anyway.

In other words, an affirmative yes requirement won't reduce the amount nonconsensual sex aka rape, it will only lead to more he said she said or didn't say.
 

wizards8507

Well-known member
Messages
20,660
Reaction score
2,661
I fail to see how requiring an affirmative "yes" changes anything at all other than by creating more awkwardness and potentially deterring sex as a whole.

It seems to me that the underlying issue is the credibility of the alleged victim and the accused. If a woman decides she wants to falsely accuse someone, this does nothing.

If a woman was in fact raped, any requirements are pointless anyway.

In other words, an affirmative yes requirement won't reduce the amount nonconsensual sex aka rape, it will only lead to more he said she said or didn't say.
A bigger problem is the perversion of the word "consent." Even an affirmative "yes" isn't enough if the "victim" has been drinking, for example. The lawyers and legislators don't think through the moronic consequences of these things. Think about it. If my wife and I have a few drinks and then have sex, we're simultaneously rapists and rape victims, as neither of us has the legal capacity to consent. How idiotic is that? We'd be raping each other . That's a gross insult to every actual rape victim out there. (Coincidentally, this is what Todd Akin meant by "legitimate rape" before his comment was twisted and spun to be something he never said. He wasn't using "legitimate" to mean "okay," but to mean "the common sense definition as people have understood the word for centuries.")
 

connor_in

Oh Yeeaah!!!
Messages
11,433
Reaction score
1,006
My browser history would indicate otherwise....

clear.jpg
 

aubeirish

Well-known member
Messages
3,601
Reaction score
149
Tip of the day fellas:
Always leave a tip. This way, it looks like you purchased a service.
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2025!
Messages
31,516
Reaction score
17,382
This was from awhile back on Sarkeesian's Twitter, but I just came across this gem:

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">The <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Fallout4?src=hash">#Fallout4</a> crafting system is cool. Imagine how much cooler it could be if it wasn’t SO focused on building stuff to kill other stuff.</p>— Feminist Frequency (@femfreq) <a href="https://twitter.com/femfreq/status/610286429390811136">June 15, 2015</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

I'm not sure what she expects to build in a post apocalyptic wasteland where most things are trying to kill you, but I would think weapons and defenses/shelter would be a big part of that. What are you going to craft, cakes and quilts?
 

BeauBenken

Shut up, Richard
Staff member
Messages
16,041
Reaction score
5,491

This can't be real.

In Karen Keller’s kindergarten classroom, boys can’t play with Legos.
They can have their pick of Tinkertoys and marble tracks, but the colorful bricks are “girls only.”
“I always tell the boys, ‘You’re going to have a turn’ — and I’m like, ‘Yeah, when hell freezes over’ in my head,” she said. “I tell them, ‘You’ll have a turn’ because I don’t want them to feel bad.”

I want to hit her.
 

wizards8507

Well-known member
Messages
20,660
Reaction score
2,661
NSFW (language)

<iframe title="MRC TV video player" width="640" height="360" src="https://www.mrctv.org/embed/141579" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 

zelezo vlk

Well-known member
Messages
18,009
Reaction score
5,048
No child should be deprived of Legos.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
 

Rhode Irish

Semi-retired
Messages
7,057
Reaction score
900

In general, I consider myself to be a supporter of the feminist cause insofar as women want to be treated fairly and equally. I think we all have mothers, daughters, wives or girlfriends and recognize that we want them to have opportunities in their lives and the ability to feel safe and not objectified or harassed. I don't think this is really a radical position, and if it bothers some people for being too progressive, so be it. But what kills me is that people like this woman would basically consider me to be more enemy than friend in her feminist crusade because her point of view is so incredibly radical and, as a result, nonsensical. And the shame of it is that this type of crazy behavior is associated with "feminism," which sets a pretty simple and fair idea back decades.

I do consider myself to be left of center on social issues, because I want to live in a society where everyone is accepted and included. That is just my basic moral and ethical belief. But so many of these radical social crusaders are their own worst enemies. I'd say the same thing about people on the extreme left on issues such as race and sexual identification, too. Something has to happen where we can have common sense discussions about these topics without the vile perspectives of those on the far left and far right, who are unfortunately the people most interested and tuned into the issues.
 

Ndaccountant

Old Hoss
Messages
8,370
Reaction score
5,771
In general, I consider myself to be a supporter of the feminist cause insofar as women want to be treated fairly and equally. I think we all have mothers, daughters, wives or girlfriends and recognize that we want them to have opportunities in their lives and the ability to feel safe and not objectified or harassed. I don't think this is really a radical position, and if it bothers some people for being too progressive, so be it. But what kills me is that people like this woman would basically consider me to be more enemy than friend in her feminist crusade because her point of view is so incredibly radical and, as a result, nonsensical. And the shame of it is that this type of crazy behavior is associated with "feminism," which sets a pretty simple and fair idea back decades.

I do consider myself to be left of center on social issues, because I want to live in a society where everyone is accepted and included. That is just my basic moral and ethical belief. But so many of these radical social crusaders are their own worst enemies. I'd say the same thing about people on the extreme left on issues such as race and sexual identification, too. Something has to happen where we can have common sense discussions about these topics without the vile perspectives of those on the far left and far right, who are unfortunately the people most interested and tuned into the issues.

+1.

The thing that bothers me the most is people who believe (and in this case enforce) actions need to be taken to push others down in an effort to promote others as if it is a zero sum gain. Want girls to play with legos in the classroom.......get more freaking legos.
 

IrishLion

I am Beyonce, always.
Staff member
Messages
19,127
Reaction score
11,077
Why can't we just give all of the kids all of the legos?

I'm trying to convince my wife that I need the Lego Millennium Falcon. I'm a grown man with a full-time job.

Everyone should have legos.
 

wizards8507

Well-known member
Messages
20,660
Reaction score
2,661
I'm trying to convince my wife that I need the Lego Millennium Falcon. I'm a grown man with a full-time job.

Everyone should have legos.
Disney employees get a sweet merch discount. I'm getting mine when I go to WDW in January.
 

no.1IrishFan

Well-known member
Messages
6,279
Reaction score
421
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/QPsn17_a8-g" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 
C

Cackalacky

Guest
Why can't we just give all of the kids all of the legos?

I'm trying to convince my wife that I need the Lego Millennium Falcon. I'm a grown man with a full-time job.

Everyone should have legos.

I am currently doing the same thing but passive aggressively.
 

Black Irish

Wise Guy
Messages
3,769
Reaction score
602
In general, I consider myself to be a supporter of the feminist cause insofar as women want to be treated fairly and equally. I think we all have mothers, daughters, wives or girlfriends and recognize that we want them to have opportunities in their lives and the ability to feel safe and not objectified or harassed. I don't think this is really a radical position, and if it bothers some people for being too progressive, so be it. But what kills me is that people like this woman would basically consider me to be more enemy than friend in her feminist crusade because her point of view is so incredibly radical and, as a result, nonsensical. And the shame of it is that this type of crazy behavior is associated with "feminism," which sets a pretty simple and fair idea back decades.

I do consider myself to be left of center on social issues, because I want to live in a society where everyone is accepted and included. That is just my basic moral and ethical belief. But so many of these radical social crusaders are their own worst enemies. I'd say the same thing about people on the extreme left on issues such as race and sexual identification, too. Something has to happen where we can have common sense discussions about these topics without the vile perspectives of those on the far left and far right, who are unfortunately the people most interested and tuned into the issues.

You have good intentions but the truth of the matter is that modern feminism has moved well past the noble general intentions that you have. The outlandish positions that so many feminist leaders articulate are not far left outliers; they are the norm. Sure, you can find the extreme examples that will be, not necessarily condemned, but given the I-would-not-have-gone-that-far-but-her-heart-as-in-the-right-place treatment. Feminism now, as it is being practiced and preached, has very much taken a hard lurch to the left beyond equal opportunity and equal treatment. The angry and punitive rhetoric is not the loud minority, it is very much the majority. Feminism has gone from being progressive to becoming a very regressive, restrictive, punishing, zero sum game.
 

GATTACA!

It's about to get gross
Messages
15,104
Reaction score
12,943
You have good intentions but the truth of the matter is that modern feminism has moved well past the noble general intentions that you have. The outlandish positions that so many feminist leaders articulate are not far left outliers; they are the norm. Sure, you can find the extreme examples that will be, not necessarily condemned, but given the I-would-not-have-gone-that-far-but-her-heart-as-in-the-right-place treatment. Feminism now, as it is being practiced and preached, has very much taken a hard lurch to the left beyond equal opportunity and equal treatment. The angry and punitive rhetoric is not the loud minority, it is very much the majority. Feminism has gone from being progressive to becoming a very regressive, restrictive, punishing, zero sum game.

Your reply raped me.
 
Top