NDShark
Well-known member
- Messages
- 1,343
- Reaction score
- 563
If they do use the same shampoo, does it mean they take "group showers"?
When horsing around in the showers goes too far...
If they do use the same shampoo, does it mean they take "group showers"?
Wow, that’s impressive considering Clemson’s fanbase. The cynic will say that Clemson is saving up for the NC game in San Francisco.
That's exactly what they are doing. Hope it bites them in the ass.
It certainly felt that way when I was looking for tickets on Vivid Seats. Higher prices and far less available on the ND side of the field. Cheapest available were in the corner where Clemson's allotment was.
Interestingly, Notre Dame either didn't initially sell out its allotment or got more tickets from the Cotton Bowl, because they came back and offered people who didn't win the lottery a chance to buy tickets last week.
i wish a random positive would trigger testing for the entire team. i'd bet there's a lot more using the same shampoo.
Shampoo? In the interview Lawrence said it could have been an energy drink or hair gel...which is funny because he currently has his hair cut too short for hair gel. The whole thing stinks, especially with 3 other players coming back positive. Reminds me of all the talk about the deer antler spray and possible shenanigans in 2012. Even the damn playing field, test the entire team when players come back with failed tests!
Take a few minutes and listen to Dabo talk about his 3 kids, NOT 1... NOT 2... 3! kids that tested positive for a steroid! It really chaps my ass for him to downplay the facts of this matter. 3 kids testing positive for the same product is an issue, not a fluke. OWN IT DABO!!!!
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/KUzZFsvtiPY" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe>
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Clemson DT Dexter Lawrence won’t play in <a href="https://twitter.com/CFBPlayoff?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@CFBPlayoff</a> semifinal vs. Notre Dame after NCAA said Lawrence’s “B” sample tested positive. Also “B” samples of TE Braden Galloway & OL Zach Giella were positive. Clemson could appeal NCAA’s ruling</p>— Brett McMurphy (@Brett_McMurphy) <a href="https://twitter.com/Brett_McMurphy/status/1078448021828861953?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 28, 2018</a>
Said it too early hahaPretty sure this is how it will go down:
1. Dexter Lawrence plays, and dominates, after being VINDICATED by a clean sample B. Dabo lauds the kid a few more times, and once again denies any wrongdoing
2. Lawrence is a high draft pick, Dabo lauds his LEADERSHIP, HIGH MOTOR, and COMPETITIVENESS
3. He gains 30 pounds of fat since he cant use PEDS anymore, and flames out of the league in 2 years
4. Dabo doesnt return calls to that GREAT KID after the NFL money is gone and he needs help
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Said it too early haha
It's sad. These guys are a clown.
Clemson won the ship the year after.Guy Is a clown. Dabo just lost all respect from my end. It's amazing.
I'm watching the 2015 game at the moment and If CJ Sanders doesn't fumble to start the 2nd half we probably win that game. They won the ship that year.
You guys can ask me about Drug tests and I'll give ya'll the flowers.
Clemson won the ship the year after.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
Hey, it worked!!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
20% fail rate... only fair to let ND fans vote out 3 other starters, right? You know, just playing the odds if they aren’t going to test the whole team for steroids.
I don't think Notre Dame is going to go against what got them to the playoffs, and I don't think they should either.. They need a solid mix of running and passing. Lax's suggestion of throwing it 50+ times and "hoping it works" is a terrible idea IMO and thats a guaranteed way to lose the game.
Notre Dame doesn't need to run for 200+ and average 5 ypc in order to be successful. Yes, Clemson has a great d-line and run defense, but ND needs to run it enough to keep the defense honest. Notre Dame making themselves one dimensional hasn't won them a game this year, and it won't win them this game either. If they can muster 3 npc and close to 100 yards rushing, I think that'll be fine.
Has anyone questioned Clemson as to why this drug miraculously ended up in 3 players and not just 1?
I don't think Notre Dame is going to go against what got them to the playoffs, and I don't think they should either.. They need a solid mix of running and passing. Lax's suggestion of throwing it 50+ times and "hoping it works" is a terrible idea IMO and thats a guaranteed way to lose the game.
Notre Dame doesn't need to run for 200+ and average 5 ypc in order to be successful. Yes, Clemson has a great d-line and run defense, but ND needs to run it enough to keep the defense honest. Notre Dame making themselves one dimensional hasn't won them a game this year, and it won't win them this game either. If they can muster 3 npc and close to 100 yards rushing, I think that'll be fine.
I think the most likely scenario is that there’s a systemic problem at Clemson with their injury rehabilitation program or less likely, the program at large. IIRC these three all suffered some sort of injury during fall camp and were likely using a substance with Ostarine in it. The counter factual, that these theee just so happened to randomly have a “hair gel” or even a tainted supplement all on their own during the season is just completely bullshit. I really hope when it’s said and done a proper investigation goes on and we get to the bottom of this
I don't disagree - ND has to run the ball to some extent.
But looking back at that game in 2015, I remember thinking to myself that ND should have adjusted to a pass heavy offense earlier in the game once they realized they couldn't get much done on the ground. It may have changed the outcome of the game.
Even this year, the teams who played Clemson close, TAM, Syracuse, and South Carolina (didn't keep it close but played well on offense), attacked them with the pass more than the run. I think ND may be better served doing the same IF they're being held to less than 4 ypc through the first quarter/mid-way through the second quarter.