NDFB's got 99 problems, but money ain't one.
What 3rd parties would Kelly be drawing a paycheck from? The NRA? United Negro College Fund? NAMBLA? The Super Adventure Club? The Church of Scientology? Mecha Streisand? Sidney Poitier? Getting Gay with Kids?
I'm legit curious.
What 3rd parties would Kelly be drawing a paycheck from? The NRA? United Negro College Fund? NAMBLA? The Super Adventure Club? The Church of Scientology? Mecha Streisand? Sidney Poitier? Getting Gay with Kids?
I'm legit curious.
No idea who is actually cutting checks, but Under Armor came to mind as a likely candidate.
Agreed. But I was wondering if someone else was paying BK too.
Does Kelly do tv and radio shows? If so, that would be another source. Also, does he have endorsements from car manufacturers, big local businesses, etc? Likely another source.
I can't find a citation to support this at the moment, but I thought it had been established that Kelly was offered the job, and that he declined it.
What's wrong with simple explanations? Occam's Razor is a powerful tool. The problem with your theory is that it requires us to ignore Kelly's immediate history of quickly taking better positions prior to ND, and it requires us to make some very unlikely assumptions about Jack Swarbrick's competence. Why would the University risk losing Kelly in order to save an inconsequential* amount of money?
*Compared to what a successful football program brings in.
2 words:
Ignore List
Can you prove he wasn't offered the job?
Can you prove he wasn't offered the job?
Want to take the bet?
Not now, but I remember hearing that. I will have an article in 2 days because I'm sure it's out there. Can't search right now.
He was asked if it was offered, and BK said something along the lines that 'it never even reached a point where we talked about an offer or possible salary'.
Last January he spent three days interviewing with the Philadelphia Eagles. "I was never offered the job," he notes. More NFL teams will come a-calling though. He can listen or stay here for what he calls "unfinished business."
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/ncaaf-...ger-to-prove-2012-was-no-fluke-193734182.html
He was asked if it was offered, and BK said something along the lines that 'it never even reached a point where we talked about an offer or possible salary'.
I just did some quick Googling and it looks like Kelly was the Eagles' top candidate until he withdrew from the process. So no, he was never "offered" the job, but he arguably could have had it if he wanted it.
I just did some quick Googling and it looks like Kelly was the Eagles' top candidate until he withdrew from the process. So no, he was never "offered" the job, but he arguably could have had it if he wanted it.
Agreed. But I was wondering if someone else was paying BK too.
The $1.46 million likely wasn't the total amount of money Kelly was paid, however. The document states that Kelly is allowed to receive pay from external sources with prior written approval from the university and isn't part of the pay listed by the university.
Not sure why this issue keeps coming up.
You will never know what he is making, unless he specifically releases it. Most articles get it get it half right, at best.
In fact, the cited Fox Sports article above, stated:
Boosters likely pay the rest of his salary, just like at many university football programs. That isn't public record. Kvetching that he makes too little based on flawed numbers is pretty fuggin stupid. Kelly makes enough to keep him here for the time being. That may or may not change in the future.
Yes, we DO have reason to assume that, as other posters have illustrated already.That's never been my point. We have no reason to assume ND approves BK to get paid outside of his contract, any more/less than the other top coaches at other programs.
"Coaches" (in general) do NOT get paid outside their contract. That's the whole point that everyone is trying to make.So coaches get paid outside of their contract, why should we believe whatever BK's getting outside of his contract makes up for the desparity?
They're NOT getting the same from boosters. These numbers are made up, but to illustrate:If BK's base salary is 1.4 million, and coach B's base salary is 4 million, and they both get the same from boosters, BK's still getting hosed IMO.
Yes, we DO have reason to assume that, as other posters have illustrated already.
"Coaches" (in general) do NOT get paid outside their contract. That's the whole point that everyone is trying to make.
They're NOT getting the same from boosters. These numbers are made up, but to illustrate:
BK: $1.4M base + $2.6M from outside sources = $4M
Other Coach: $4M base + $0M from outside sources = $4M
So no other coaches are getting any pay outside of their contract, which is made of base salary plus incentives? BK is alone in getting this special pay? Stoops, Saban, Urban aren't getting any of this special pay?
If that's the case I honestly missed that source.
Here, Weis receives an annual salary ($2.5 million) and brings home a monthly pay check. Although just $230,000 of that is considered his “base salary” all of it comes directly from Kansas Athletics, Inc., and is reported on KAI's federal taxes. According to Weis' contract with KU, the remaining $2,270,000 per year is for “professional services rendered” and is referenced in the contract at “Guaranteed Net Income.”
At Notre Dame, Weis said he received a relatively modest base salary directly from Notre Dame while the majority of his compensation came from other vendors tied to the athletic department — think payments for his TV show, radio show, clothing deals and money from any partnerships with companies like Nike, adidas, Under Armor or the like.
That's never been my point. We have no reason to assume ND approves BK to get paid outside of his contract, any more/less than the other top coaches at other programs.
So coaches get paid outside of their contract, why should we believe whatever BK's getting outside of his contract makes up for the desparity?
If BK's base salary is 1.4 million, and coach B's base salary is 4 million, and they both get the same from boosters, BK's still getting hosed IMO.
If you can show that BK gets paid a low salary because ND is alone in paying so much outside of the contracts and other programs do not do this, then the 'BK is paid just fine' argument I will buy. But I don't believe that because I have no reason to based on what I know.
From my previously linked article a few posts ago
That $2.5M also matches the coaches payment data in the USA Today tracker, linked here (Weis base at $2.5M).
USA Today | Sports | COLLEGE
Finally, note that the highest other payment on the list is $300K and that BK's is left blank.
I know it's your thing, but you're really talking out of your ass right now. I just wrote it happens at most other big time football programs.
(Made up, illustrative numbers) It's not that they both get paid $4 mill by boosters, but that boosters from both schools pay so that the total compensation salary is $4 mill. At ND, the percentage of cash and benefits paid for by the boosters may be higher. Get it?
Thanks for the link. So Weis says he was mostly paid outside of his base salary, but what do you make of BK's 'other pay' being blank? Simply that it's unlisted, but significant?
Talking out of my ass isn't my thing. Neither is making assumptions based on what makes me feel cozy inside, like you are with the mystery pay that BK allegedly receives that no other college coaches do.
Sure, it maybe. And it maybe the same. Or it maybe even lower. Get it? I'm not making an assumption based on what I want to hear. I'm simply saying there's no reason to NOT take it at face value considering we do not know that BK is paid 'outside of his contract' more/less/the same as Stoops, Urban, etc.
Based on what? And what's to say other CFB coaches aren't also getting large amounts outside of their contract, which brings it back to my point of relativity.
If BK gets .6 million salary, .7 million bonuses, and is paid 2 million outside of the contract, while other coaches get 2 million salary, .7 bonuses, and 2 million outside of contract, BKs still getting hosed.