FightingIrishLover7
All troll, no substance
- Messages
- 12,703
- Reaction score
- 7,516
That Ishaq to Ewell comparison is pretty sad. Not even remotely comparable.
Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
Ishaq "failed" in my opinion because of bad DC scheme as far as his positioning was concerned. Playing in space? Really? Ishaq should have been at a rush end essentially all the time. I was head-shaking continuously watching him trying to play out=of-position almost all his career.
Upsetting to hear about Allen and Ewell.
Ewell reminds me of Ishaq Williams, both highly recruited, but they couldn't pan out at playing the level of college football at ND.
As far as Allen, anything I've read about him is that he's one of the players that need to have an important spring. Seems to me that it is coming down to a make it or brake it spring. If he doesn't make it, I wonder if he'd transfer? I was surprised that Allen couldn't find his way onto special teams last year. Hoping for the best for Allen is at ND.
It’s Allen’s first Spring practice, ever, at ND. And it’s a make it or break it Spring? I’ll save that statement for after the kid has been on campus for at least 1 year, lol.
Also, it sounds like with all the work he’s getting he’s been improving. Pretty unuimous from those that watched Saturday’s practice.
One concern I have is the lack of development at the DB position an area where we recruiting well the last two years yet we aren’t really hearing about anyone jumping out. Hopefully some freshman make some
Noise once they get on campus
Lack of development? Bracy is banged up and Griffin is playing a new position this spring. They're also going against the most talented position group on the team. Finke, Claypool, Austin, Keys, and Kmet have been great.
The staff has developed Love (3*) into an AA. Troy Pride (3*) took a huge step up last year and according to reports this spring, has been great.
At safety, Elliott (3*) has improved dramatically since stepping foot on campus. Gilman (3*) is banged up this spring but is a leader and played really well last year.
What exactly are you looking for?
Also, it sounds like with all the work he’s getting he’s been improving. Pretty unuimous from those that watched Saturday’s practice.
One concern I have is the lack of development at the DB position an area where we recruiting well the last two years yet we aren’t really hearing about anyone jumping out. Hopefully some freshman make some
Noise once they get on campus
Ishaq "failed" in my opinion because of bad DC scheme as far as his positioning was concerned. Playing in space? Really? Ishaq should have been at a rush end essentially all the time. I was head-shaking continuously watching him trying to play out=of-position almost all his career.
Ishaq was the CAT in Diaco's scheme which is essentially a rush end. That's basically most of what Prince Shembo did in '12 and '13. He struggled at the DOG position, because that position is required to play a ton in space. CAT, not so much, which is why Shembo thrived after switching. Ishaq was always a CAT and yet never made the jump.
I don't think we ever saw Ishaq show signs of being a consistent and quality pass rusher at that level. He would flash, but flashing only goes so far. You have to be able to provide more than just an inconsistent pass rush.
It's no different than the DROP is in Lea's system, except they play on the line a bit more, but the CAT lined up on the line quite a bit under Diaco.
I'll bow to your better knowledge, but my old memory sees Ishaq standing up nearly every play and often not rushing.
No, you had it right, OMM.
Ishaq started as a DOG in Diaco's system. It was a bad decision, but Diaco wanted his five-star player on the field to clog throwing lanes and to occasionally rush the passer.
Most of the early reviews were "Ishaq moves pretty well in space, but he's not really suited to be a linebacker like that. He should be rushing the passer."
By the time anyone realized it wasn't working and they finally just let him play some CAT, and then as a true DE with his hand on the ground after that, he flashed like Balki said, but it was too late to salvage his full potential at that point.
Unrelated: I'm gonna ban the next person that tries to have a meltdown over a sophomore's development.
Disagree. There's been some struggles, but there have been plenty of DB's that have shown improvement or stood out.
DJ Brown has been mentioned a few times since switching to safety. Davis has transitioned almost seamlessly to nickel and has looked good for the most part. Griffith is doing well replacing Love. Pride appears to have taken another step forward. Bracy looked good until the injury.
The only guy I can think of that has reported to be consistently struggling is Allen, and like Lucci mentioned, he's only been in the program for about 9 months and this is his first spring and first real taste of legit action.
I'm FAR more concerned with linebacker, where other than maybe Lamb and JOK, there doesn't appear to be anybody standing out and tackling/assignments have been an issue. No mention of Genmark-Heath has been concerning to me. Thought he would be the #1 guy at Buck.
Shayne Simon is more puzzling to me. He was recruited specifically to play Rover, Then basically was the guy in waiting for all of 2018 and expected to walk into the starting role in 2019 but the word is now he isn't physical enough and is likely lost in the shuffle
No, you had it right, OMM.
Ishaq started as a DOG in Diaco's system. It was a bad decision, but Diaco wanted his five-star player on the field to clog throwing lanes and to occasionally rush the passer.
Most of the early reviews were "Ishaq moves pretty well in space, but he's not really suited to be a linebacker like that. He should be rushing the passer."
By the time anyone realized it wasn't working and they finally just let him play some CAT, and then as a true DE with his hand on the ground after that, he flashed like Balki said, but it was too late to salvage his full potential at that point.
Unrelated: I'm gonna ban the next person that tries to have a meltdown over a sophomore's development.
Everyone seems to still be super high on JOKs athleticism. I sincerely hope he can learn to play assignment sound football because he has the makings of a hugely impactful player.
Feel like orthopedic surgeons are going to make a killing from all of this knee-jerking going on.
Spring ball is a peaceful time for me. Low expectations. A lot of these guys are entering their first full spring, or at the very least, are entering their first spring with elevated expectations/higher responsibility competing for a starting position. The open practices and the scrimmage themselves are all watered down schematically anyways, so I'll trust the staff and take whatever the pundits are writing with a grain of salt. Offseason blues and the associated headlines tend to affect some more than others.
I'll start to sweat this more if we get to mid-August and we still don't have a clear rotation in place at LB. The staff knows what they are doing and they're just plugging and playing right now trying to get an idea.
I trust this staff. Maybe 3 years ago I would panic at the mere mention that a highly rated guy isn't getting it. But this new staff has identified talent and found a way to get the very best from most of them, even the lower 3 star guys. I think Clark will have a good linebacker group by August. Maybe not like last year due to inexperience but productive.
Something that the guys at ISD have brought up and I think it's very plausible this could be the case. The LB unit overall will not be as good as last year but it doesn't have to mean they won't be in all areas. More blown assignments than we've become accustomed to, most likely. However, there is a chance that with better athletes we could see more big plays/negative plays created.
Consider this, both Coney (9.5 TFL's) and Tranquill (9 TFL's) had less TFL's in 18' than they did 17'. For Tranquill it was partially due to a position switch. However, Asmar (3 TFL's) didn't pick up the slack in the department as the starting Rover. In fact, the group as a whole had less in 18' than 17' even though overall play seemed better. In 2018, 21.5 TFL's from your starting LB's (who didn't concede many snaps all year, isn't all that great). So, we very well may see the overall play of the group diminish, but there could be areas where they are better/more productive. Or positions where we get better play.
No, you had it right, OMM.
Ishaq started as a DOG in Diaco's system. It was a bad decision, but Diaco wanted his five-star player on the field to clog throwing lanes and to occasionally rush the passer.
Most of the early reviews were "Ishaq moves pretty well in space, but he's not really suited to be a linebacker like that. He should be rushing the passer."
By the time anyone realized it wasn't working and they finally just let him play some CAT, and then as a true DE with his hand on the ground after that, he flashed like Balki said, but it was too late to salvage his full potential at that point.
Unrelated: I'm gonna ban the next person that tries to have a meltdown over a sophomore's development.