I stated an opinion.
"Oh.... and rape a girl" = opinion
"He was also convicted of rape" = stated fact
See the difference?
Comparing that to listing all of the discretions in a marginalizing way while completely removing the most egregious act is on a completely different scope. Hell, if I would have simply added a "?" at the end of my sentence, we wouldn't even be having this conversation. Intellectually dishonesty is drastically different than punctuation error.
That's not how English works...
"In my opinion, he raped a girl." or "He probably raped a girl" or "I think he raped that girl" = opinions (technically the "probably" example is also a stated fact but I would've let that slide since it opens up the possibility that he didn't do it.)
"He raped a girl." or "He was convicted of rape." = stated facts
Regardless, I think your opinion is pretty baseless.
Even the DA has said on the record that bad things happened that night, but that he didn't have enough evidence to prosecute. Well we don't have the evidence to prosecute because of the shitty ass investigation done by the TPD.
Nobody's saying the investigation was done correctly. I think a big difference here is what we think happened with the TPD. You seem to think that there was some sort of a cover-up, that TPD had evidence of the rape claim but covered it up. I think it's more likely that TPD ignored the complaint without any knowledge of its truth or falsity. These are both horrible indictments of the TPD, but in one of them Winston was just as much the victim of their incompetence because he lost the ability to clear his name.
Also, it's going to take more than the District Attorney saying something vaguely threatening and passing the buck to make me immediately assume that someone committed one of the worst crimes imaginable. "Bad things happened that night" sounds like typical state prosecutor BS to me.