He legitimately left 4 TDs on the field in the 1st half with off target throws. All his throws downfield are wobblers. Ironically, he seems to play the same kind of “game” as book.... good distributing the ball underneath and can make plays with his legs, cannot throw accurately down the field. Difference is that with Book they’re at least spirals.
I felt the same, but whereas you were unimpressed, I actually continue to be more impressed by Phil.
He misses some throws and leaves yards on the field... but when it's late and they let him line up and go, his 'creator' tendencies (very similar to Book) stand out, because he uses his mobility and comfort in freestyling to make things happen against vanilla defensive looks. He even hits more of the deep shots when that happens, though it helps that Zay Flowers is very fast and good at moving towards his scramble, and that his TE is really good in general.
The differences I see make it a wash between Phil and Book, IMO, and that's probably why Phil felt 'stuck,' but also why the coaching staff was completely justified when they didn't see the merit in removing Book at any point during his early struggles last year. Why go from one guy to another when both guys play similar games, especially when one guy has an edge in experience?
They are both at their best when the move and get into the flow of the no-huddle at fast tempo. Whereas Ian will take off or hit an underneath/outside throw with accuracy, Phil prefers to throw deep middle. Ian has more accuracy, but Phil seems more willing to test the defense between the hashes.
Both styles have merit, and it's worked out for BC thus far. We'll see what happens when they play a DC that has had adequate time to come up with a plan for defending Phil in the inevitable no-huddle situations they find themselves in*.
*In this house, we respect Clark Lea.