If that was BK he would be getting absolutely destroyed.
I'm just going to assume it's all Mora's fault and continue to dislike him
I'm just going to assume it's all Mora's fault and continue to dislike him
True, but sometimes I wish BK would say stuff like that. Can't always be upbeat and positive about your players.
i gurantee you kelly is absolutely ruthless behind close doors.
i had a front row seat to him destroying tony pike when he was at cincy
currently 12-14, 117 yards and 2 TDs against Virginia
Very impressed so far.
Agreed. But I'm liking what I'm seeing of UVA's pass defense, as it bodes for the Irish playing in Charlottesville. It's not very good.
Josh Rosen Q&A: UCLA QB on Injuries, NCAA and Post-NFL Goal to 'Own the World' | Bleacher ReportLook, football and school don't go together. They just don't. Trying to do both is like trying to do two full-time jobs. There are guys who have no business being in school, but they're here because this is the path to the NFL. There's no other way. Then there's the other side that says raise the SAT eligibility requirements. OK, raise the SAT requirement at Alabama and see what kind of team they have. You lose athletes and then the product on the field suffers.
I like him even more now...
the headlines/hot takes from this article are very absurd but when you read the article he speaks very well and makes valid points.
the headlines/hot takes from this article are very absurd but when you read the article he speaks very well and makes valid points.
I love it when people speak truth to power, which is exactly what Rosen just did.
So...evidently the Bruins have a tremendous amount of academic scholars on their football team because they suck at football.
While I agree with Rosen that football players have tremendous schedules, I disagree if he thinks athletes can't receive good educations. They do it all the time at every university.
So...evidently the Bruins have a tremendous amount of academic scholars on their football team because they suck at football.
While I agree with Rosen that football players have tremendous schedules, I disagree if he thinks athletes can't receive good educations. They do it all the time at every university.
Some do, some don't, regardless of which school you're at. I think what he's saying is that, generally speaking, the education players receive isn't worth much because there is not enough academic support for players, they're often pushed into worthless majors to help them stay eligible, etc. Not the case for all, but in general I believe he's correct.
This is also an implicit argument in favor of players getting paid. Currently, many argue that the value of the education they receive is effectively payment enough for the players. Rosen's saying that the value of that education is greatly diminished because of football, which would imply that it's not payment enough (or at all). I think he's right on the money with that (see: UNC).