No need to repeat myself, I've made my argument clear in that regard. Today's bump was in light of a new piece of information (Carolina's win over Arizona) that I believe illustrates my point.
Funny how the two things people go after me for the most stand in stark contrast to one another: I'm too pro-ESPN and I also hate the playoff too much.
The NFL never made college football's claim that their regular season is superior due to the fact that "every game matters." In the NFL, not every game does matter, and certainly not equally. However, if we're operating under the premise that part of what makes CFB great is that every game DOES matter, we shouldn't accept a system in which we crown a national champion that is clearly inferior to a team they defeat in a single head-to-head matchup, ignoring the evidence of the previous 12 or 13 games.
Example: If the 18-0 Patriots lose to the 12-6 Giants in 2007 under an "every game matters" system, the Patriots still get my vote for National Champion, assuming our goal is to equate "National Champion" with "best team that year."