irishpat183
Banned
- Messages
- 5,625
- Reaction score
- 504
So, to catch up, fans are pissed about a team not singing a song after losing a big game?
My point was, forget the song, is that Kelly isn't on the same page as his team.
So, to catch up, fans are pissed about a team not singing a song after losing a big game?
So, to catch up, fans are pissed about a team not singing a song after losing a big game?
It's been outlined numerous times on this thread why it's not just about singing a song or "swaying like nuns". So either you a.) automatically dismissed a valid complaint by people who actually went to ND b.) are fishing for reps from one of the other manly men who don't see the point in athletes embracing their community or c.) are just being a jacka$$. ND students who aren't freshmen have seen a lot of losses - as have the football players. But after all of those losses, the alma mater was sung, to show that the University is greater than the game. Apparently Brian doesn't think his team is tough enough to stand up to that "exposure" unless they have won the game. So yeah, buddy, fans are pissed about a team not singing a song after losing a big game. I'm done with this thread, it's ridiculous how dismissive some people are about something that's clearly important to the current students and alumni.
It's been outlined numerous times on this thread why it's not just about singing a song or "swaying like nuns". So either you a.) automatically dismissed a valid complaint by people who actually went to ND b.) are fishing for reps from one of the other manly men who don't see the point in athletes embracing their community or c.) are just being a jacka$$. ND students who aren't freshmen have seen a lot of losses - as have the football players. But after all of those losses, the alma mater was sung, to show that the University is greater than the game. Apparently Brian doesn't think his team is tough enough to stand up to that "exposure" unless they have won the game. So yeah, buddy, fans are pissed about a team not singing a song after losing a big game. I'm done with this thread, it's ridiculous how dismissive some people are about something that's clearly important to the current students and alumni.
/golfclap
The bigger issue here has nothing to do with "singing the song"... it has to do with a coach who is dumb enough to make a "policy" that is equivocal to giving the finger to the students. Regardless of how much other fans of many different feathers might flake on the team, the one group that is always there to the end is the students. How dumb does Brian Kelly have to be to do this? I mean that seriously... how f*cking short-sighted and stupid do you have to be to go "Hey, you know what would be a good idea? Let me try to **** off the one group of people that is supporting this team unequivocally right now for literally no rationale reason." This is a Weisian move. Maybe even a Kiffian move. This is how you start punching your ticket out of town.
Kelly has always been lauded as a good politician... as someone who "gets it" and all that jazz... I don't know what changed, but starting with the NFL flirtation he is all over the map now. The sheer level of BS he spews in press conferences has been bad since Week 1 and just continues to snow ball from there. Every media person I know... hell every remotely informed person I know... can point out a half dozen factually incorrect or ridiculously contradictory statements he makes each week. Now he's saying that he put in a "policy" that no one was aware of for player safety... err, wait... exposure? to get them under his guidance?... yeah OK.
Ironically, the only thing he has accomplished is destroying the message that we're in this together and should stick around through the highs and lows. The new message is "if things are going south, eff it." SMH.
Not only does Kelly have a record comparable to Kiffin, apparently he's also starting to mimic his brilliant PR approach.
I'll amend my rant to say I was just told Kelly isn't the one who spearheaded the change. Which reinforces the idea of him spewing BS recently, but goes against the idea that he's turning directly into Kiffin.
I'll amend my rant to say I was just told Kelly isn't the one who spearheaded the change. Which reinforces the idea of him spewing BS recently, but goes against the idea that he's turning directly into Kiffin.
Sometimes a good soldier takes the brunt of the criticism that should be thrown in another direction. Not sure how this is BK's fault at all.
Come on, man. You are typically a VERY solid poster. But what's with the hyperbole? Kiffin? Really? Step back and ask yourself if you really think BK is anything like that waste of space. Granted, the recent news you're sharing does argue against it. But still0 BK has done more good for ND than Kiffin has done in his life for all programs combined.
Kelly has the resume to back up that he is a good coach and a program builder. I'm just saying that this recent move seemed borderline Kiffian. The difference is that Kiffin makes a move like this once a week, Kelly this is the first time ever. And now it seems like he's just handling the policy change in the best way possible, and there was actually something to precipitate the move. So like I said... this goes away from the idea of him going Kiffin, but supports the idea that he is talking out of both sides of his mouth with regularity this season. You can't expect coaches to be honest, but I'd rather he go Bellichickian and say next to nothing than make up flimsy excuses.
Their records at USC vs. ND are just about identical on the field though. No arguing that sadly.
Big difference. Kiffin's success (however brief) was in the very beginning of his USC career. BK's success was last year, with a very good Freshman class this year. Their trajectories were polar opposite.
Not really though. Kiffin won with Pete's players. Kelly won largely with Weis' players. Kiffin won 1 year before Kelly, but both did it with the rosters they inherited.
The only players Kelly used last year that were really his guys were Tuitt, Golson, Daniels (in spot duty), Farley (in spot duty due to injury), Russell (injury). I'd argue that IF Notre Dame is bad next year that Kelly will have a very similar trajectory to Kiffin. But he has awhile before it's time to worry about that.
I'll amend my rant to say I was just told Kelly isn't the one who spearheaded the change. Which reinforces the idea of him spewing BS recently, but goes against the idea that he's turning directly into Kiffin.
What's worse though? Spearheading change or losing control of your program so that change happens without your say-so?
What's worse though? Spearheading change or losing control of your program so that change happens without your say-so?
Who has more say so, BK or Swarbrick? BK only has so much power especially against a guy like Swarbrick.
Kelly has a boss, like 99.9% of us in this world. So I think "losing control" is a pretty big overstatement. And he obviously signed off on it.
The Observer wars have begun.
Viewpoint - The Observer - University of Notre Dame and Saint Mary's College
War requires opposition, no? Those editorials are pretty one sided.
Not really though. Kiffin won with Pete's players. Kelly won largely with Weis' players. Kiffin won 1 year before Kelly, but both did it with the rosters they inherited.
The only players Kelly used last year that were really his guys were Tuitt, Golson, Daniels (in spot duty), Farley (in spot duty due to injury), Russell (injury). I'd argue that IF Notre Dame is bad next year that Kelly will have a very similar trajectory to Kiffin. But he has awhile before it's time to worry about that.