- Messages
- 20,894
- Reaction score
- 8,126
I'm for deferring, but only because we've been very productive in the 3rd quarter thus far and have reliably screwed up almost every opening drive this season.
I'm for deferring, but only because we've been very productive in the 3rd quarter thus far and have reliably screwed up almost every opening drive this season.
Also that we're cosmically incapable of opening a game without some combination of timeouts and delay of game penalties.I think part of the problem is defenses are flying to the ball against us in the opening quarter and half. They're somewhat more winded by the 2nd half, and we've made adjustments at that point too. In the first possession you have no idea how the defense is really going to react and how they're going to attack you. We really should think about deferring.
BK stated he will always take the ball if we win the toss...this was like 2 years ago when he was asked...
Also that we're cosmically incapable of opening a game without some combination of timeouts and delay of game penalties.
For those people who were worried about JJ, he was being interviewed by NDonNBC today.
Got my wisdom teeth out yesterday. In so much pain. ND better win, so at least I can be happy while Im in pain lol
Man. Pop a few extra vicadins before the game and really get it crankin'...
Btw, how in the heck did you secure a handle like "nd fan" in 2013. How did that get missed so long? lol
<script height="365px" width="633px" src="http://player.ooyala.com/iframe.js#pbid=2c28fa2d5e7b4231ae5b2b20b88a741e&ec=M4d2F1cDqwKTUt7rFt_lAtcPiy4yGrlX"></script>
Not to derail this great thread but just wanted to post an update: our son was born at 9:13. 8 lbs 3 ozs, 21.5 inches long, healthy and asleep next to mom.
He said he wanted ND to kick Stanford's ass for his birthday.
... our son was born at 9:13. 8 lbs 3 ozs, 21.5 inches long, healthy and asleep next to mom.
He said he wanted ND to kick Stanford's ass for his birthday.
I'm not debating the advantage of scoring on the first drive. The problem is Notre Dame never seems to do it. Starting with the ball in the second half is great because you a) always know what you need and b) You have the ball AFTER making half-time adjustments. The first half is all about your initial gameplan...which could be a poor one.
I'm kind of freaking about about the bug going around the football players.
Sorry man I disagree here. You're forgetting the best reason to take the ball. Our defensive adjustments have been consistently lights out in the second half this year. If you asked me which half I would rather have our defense have an extra possession I'd pick second half every time.
Not to derail this great thread but just wanted to post an update: our son was born at 9:13. 8 lbs 3 ozs, 21.5 inches long, healthy and asleep next to mom.
He said he wanted ND to kick Stanford's ass for his birthday.
Not to derail this great thread but just wanted to post an update: our son was born at 9:13. 8 lbs 3 ozs, 21.5 inches long, healthy and asleep next to mom.
He said he wanted ND to kick Stanford's ass for his birthday.
As Whiskey already pointed out our third quarter offense has been incredible...So at a minimum it's a wash in that sense.
One other thing about deferring that people forget about is that by taking the ball first, you have the ability to run a scripted drive with no pressure from the rest of the game. You can test certain theories, be aggressive and do so without any amount of game behind you telling the opposing DC's what to do. The opponent doesn't know what is working and what is not yet, so that is a clear advantage to the offensive play caller. Something you cannot get after playing a half of football.
That point, I assume, is very appealing to an offensive guy like BK.
Not to derail this great thread but just wanted to post an update: our son was born at 9:13. 8 lbs 3 ozs, 21.5 inches long, healthy and asleep next to mom.
He said he wanted ND to kick Stanford's ass for his birthday.