OCIrish
Fukk Michigan
- Messages
- 3,280
- Reaction score
- 218
Lol, good call. I should probably get help.
Maybe!!!! Haha
Lol, good call. I should probably get help.
I was referring to the thread itself... what a tire fire.
boggs=grubl?????
You may now return to your flogging.
Creepiness:
If you’re a follower of recruiting, you should take this canard personally. They’re talking about you too. We both follow these young recruits. The difference is that instead of remaining in the shadows, I acknowledge my presence and publicly congratulate them on their accomplishments.
Motivation: Most people assume that I’m trying to convince the recruit to choose Notre Dame. This is not the case. I know my comments will have absolutely no impact on their decision. The reason I tweet to recruits is to let them know that Notre Dame fans would like them to attend the University. Do recruits really care how supportive the different college fan bases are? The answer to this question is obvious. I’m just a member of that larger fan base.
NCAA Violation:
I also think this can happen following recruiting generally when people start doing things like analyzing a recruits body with their shirt off or making comments like "it moved" when a recruit shows interest (I can't remember what poster does that a lot and do not mean that statement as a personal attack, I just think its a weird, inappropriate way of expressing excitement regarding a recruit).
This will not be a popular opinion with many here but I commend NDIrishManiac for defending his position and not resorting to insults or running away without addressing the criticism of others. That said, I think tweeting recruits is generally a bad idea and when people do it obsessively it does become weird and creepy. I also think this can happen following recruiting generally when people start doing things like analyzing a recruits body with their shirt off or making comments like "it moved" when a recruit shows interest (I can't remember what poster does that a lot and do not mean that statement as a personal attack, I just think its a weird, inappropriate way of expressing excitement regarding a recruit). It is late and Im exhausted from studying so this is not my most coherent post but I guess what Im trying to get at is that some people are being a little too harsh with their hatred of NDIrishManiac and I give him credit for responding in a reasonable manner. I also think he should give up or at least ease up on the tweeting and the rest of us should probably examine our own behaviors about recruiting before getting high and mighty and rushing to bash others even if their behaviors may be more extreme or inappropriate.
Thank you for the lone ray of objectivity I’ve experienced on this board. I apologize for any repercussions you may suffer from having shown kindness to a reviled creature such as myself. Hopefully, you can take some solace in knowing that you’ve written what you believe to be the truth. It’s seems strange to me that some can hate others just for sharing their honest opinion.
I probably won’t be posting on this board much more. I’ve said my piece, and I’ve done the whole message board thing before. It’s a much bigger time waster than Twitter.
To the haters … the feeling is not mutual. I’m not the kind of person who harbors resentment. Anger is an unpleasant feeling, so I hope you can let it go.
If anyone wants to discuss tweeting to recruits or even offer-based ranking, I’ll be over on the Twitter machine. Look me up.
Who knows, maybe if I’m bored one day I may even post something for all my friends on IrishEnvy.
Thanks again, ShawneeIrish
Oh, PS … Posters, please remember that recruits and players do find their way to these pages sometimes. I’d hate to think that they’d read some of the hurtful things I’ve read on here.
This is hardly the extent of what you do. Your engagement with recruits runs muuuuch deeper than simply publicly congratulating them on their accomplishments. I could post visual evidence if you care to disagree?
I'm not going to spend the time to psychoanalyze you based on your tweets, but my belief is there is much more to it than the bolded sentence above.
What T Town Tommy said...
Agreed. Some of the comments on recruits' threads on this site are inappropriate and most are usually met with the same disdain held for those people that tweet obsessively at recruits.
This will not be a popular opinion with many here but I commend NDIrishManiac for defending his position and not resorting to insults or running away without addressing the criticism of others. That said, I think tweeting recruits is generally a bad idea and when people do it obsessively it does become weird and creepy. I also think this can happen following recruiting generally when people start doing things like analyzing a recruits body with their shirt off or making comments like "it moved" when a recruit shows interest (I can't remember what poster does that a lot and do not mean that statement as a personal attack, I just think its a weird, inappropriate way of expressing excitement regarding a recruit). It is late and Im exhausted from studying so this is not my most coherent post but I guess what Im trying to get at is that some people are being a little too harsh with their hatred of NDIrishManiac and I give him credit for responding in a reasonable manner. I also think he should give up or at least ease up on the tweeting and the rest of us should probably examine our own behaviors about recruiting before getting high and mighty and rushing to bash others even if their behaviors may be more extreme or inappropriate.
To the haters,the feeling is not mutual. I’m not the kind of person who harbors resentment. Anger is an unpleasant feeling, so I hope you can let it go.
Quote:
Originally Posted by NDIrishManiac View Post
To the haters,the feeling is not mutual. I’m not the kind of person who harbors resentment. Anger is an unpleasant feeling, so I hope you can let it go.
That's rich.
Since this discussion has been moved to a more appropriate thread, I’m going to respond to your comments. Aside from name-calling, your points boil down to three main themes:
Creepiness: This disingenuous portrayal is designed to demonize the target. It plays upon the age of the recruits to imply that the target is something akin to a child molester. The truth of the matter is that the age of the recruits is immaterial. They would be treated exactly the same if they were 21, 25, or 35. What matters is that they are Notre Dame recruits, not their age.
If you’re a follower of recruiting, you should take this canard personally. They’re talking about you too. We both follow these young recruits. The difference is that instead of remaining in the shadows, I acknowledge my presence and publicly congratulate them on their accomplishments.
Motivation: Most people assume that I’m trying to convince the recruit to choose Notre Dame. This is not the case. I know my comments will have absolutely no impact on their decision. The reason I tweet to recruits is to let them know that Notre Dame fans would like them to attend the University. Do recruits really care how supportive the different college fan bases are? The answer to this question is obvious. I’m just a member of that larger fan base.
NCAA Violation: In my opinion, this is the only legitimate criticism of tweeting to recruits. If I believed it truly was a violation that could hurt the university, I wouldn’t do it.
I’ve read the NCAA rules in question. I acknowledge that tweeting to recruits could technically be considered an extremely minor violation under the very broadest interpretation. Realistically, even if it were interpreted as a violation, it would be one so small that no one would care. I’m not convinced it poses any risk whatsoever to the University.
Notre Dame did publish a video telling fans not to contact recruits. It was a wise move on the part of the University. If the NCAA should, for some reason, try to hold Notre Dame responsible for the actions of its fans, the University can demonstrate that it made efforts to prevent it. The video was a very cheap insurance policy. It may have worked too well. No other college football fan base is nearly as paranoid about this issue.
You may now return to your flogging.
Solid post. Coherent. Rational. Convincing. *fart*
![]()
This will not be a popular opinion with many here but I commend NDIrishManiac for defending his position without resorting to insults
I realize that many Notre Dame fans believe tweeting to recruits is tantamount to murder ever since the video came out from ND Compliance.
I’ve seen the video several times, and I’ve considered this issue at length. I disagree. If regular fans tweeting to recruits is indeed a violation (this is debatable), it is one so minor that the NCAA has never hinted at enforcing it even though it is violated openly thousands of times every day.
What do the recruits think about fans tweeting to them? They expect it and encourage it. In my opinion, Notre Dame fans have handicapped themselves in this regard.
Please don’t hate me. I am not a monster!
Creepiness:
If you’re a follower of recruiting, you should take this canard personally. They’re talking about you too. We both follow these young recruits. The difference is that instead of remaining in the shadows, I acknowledge my presence and publicly congratulate them on their accomplishments.
Motivation: Most people assume that I’m trying to convince the recruit to choose Notre Dame. This is not the case. I know my comments will have absolutely no impact on their decision. The reason I tweet to recruits is to let them know that Notre Dame fans would like them to attend the University. Do recruits really care how supportive the different college fan bases are? The answer to this question is obvious. I’m just a member of that larger fan base.
NCAA Violation:
I’ve read the NCAA rules in question. I acknowledge that tweeting to recruits could technically be considered an extremely minor violation under the very broadest interpretation. Notre Dame did publish a video telling fans not to contact recruits. It may have worked too well. No other college football fan base is nearly as paranoid about this issue.
Since this discussion has been moved to a more appropriate thread, I’m going to respond to your comments. Aside from name-calling, your points boil down to three main themes:
Creepiness: This disingenuous portrayal is designed to demonize the target. It plays upon the age of the recruits to imply that the target is something akin to a child molester. The truth of the matter is that the age of the recruits is immaterial. They would be treated exactly the same if they were 21, 25, or 35. What matters is that they are Notre Dame recruits, not their age.
If you’re a follower of recruiting, you should take this canard personally. They’re talking about you too. We both follow these young recruits. The difference is that instead of remaining in the shadows, I acknowledge my presence and publicly congratulate them on their accomplishments.
Motivation: Most people assume that I’m trying to convince the recruit to choose Notre Dame. This is not the case. I know my comments will have absolutely no impact on their decision. The reason I tweet to recruits is to let them know that Notre Dame fans would like them to attend the University. Do recruits really care how supportive the different college fan bases are? The answer to this question is obvious. I’m just a member of that larger fan base.
NCAA Violation: In my opinion, this is the only legitimate criticism of tweeting to recruits. If I believed it truly was a violation that could hurt the university, I wouldn’t do it.
I’ve read the NCAA rules in question. I acknowledge that tweeting to recruits could technically be considered an extremely minor violation under the very broadest interpretation. Realistically, even if it were interpreted as a violation, it would be one so small that no one would care. I’m not convinced it poses any risk whatsoever to the University.
Notre Dame did publish a video telling fans not to contact recruits. It was a wise move on the part of the University. If the NCAA should, for some reason, try to hold Notre Dame responsible for the actions of its fans, the University can demonstrate that it made efforts to prevent it. The video was a very cheap insurance policy. It may have worked too well. No other college football fan base is nearly as paranoid about this issue.
You may now return to your flogging.
I think LA pretty much put this nail in the coffin.
I started reading the next star of Chris Hansen's "To Catch a Predator" post and the first thing that popped out was the fact that he made himself a hypocrite as LA so wonderfully pointed out.
The most glaring thing I read there is that you don't think the age matters.
Guess what it certainly does. If you were tweeting at Tom Brady all day long no one would give a **** what so over. I am willing to wager quite a bit of my vfortune that you have never tweeted an NFL free agent about his upcoming decision.
You clearly have something for high school boys.
Since this discussion has been moved to a more appropriate thread, I’m going to respond to your comments. Aside from name-calling, your points boil down to three main themes:
Creepiness: This disingenuous portrayal is designed to demonize the target. It plays upon the age of the recruits to imply that the target is something akin to a child molester. The truth of the matter is that the age of the recruits is immaterial. They would be treated exactly the same if they were 21, 25, or 35. What matters is that they are Notre Dame recruits, not their age.
If you’re a follower of recruiting, you should take this canard personally. They’re talking about you too. We both follow these young recruits. The difference is that instead of remaining in the shadows, I acknowledge my presence and publicly congratulate them on their accomplishments.
Motivation: Most people assume that I’m trying to convince the recruit to choose Notre Dame. This is not the case. I know my comments will have absolutely no impact on their decision. The reason I tweet to recruits is to let them know that Notre Dame fans would like them to attend the University. Do recruits really care how supportive the different college fan bases are? The answer to this question is obvious. I’m just a member of that larger fan base.
NCAA Violation: In my opinion, this is the only legitimate criticism of tweeting to recruits. If I believed it truly was a violation that could hurt the university, I wouldn’t do it.
I’ve read the NCAA rules in question. I acknowledge that tweeting to recruits could technically be considered an extremely minor violation under the very broadest interpretation. Realistically, even if it were interpreted as a violation, it would be one so small that no one would care. I’m not convinced it poses any risk whatsoever to the University.
Notre Dame did publish a video telling fans not to contact recruits. It was a wise move on the part of the University. If the NCAA should, for some reason, try to hold Notre Dame responsible for the actions of its fans, the University can demonstrate that it made efforts to prevent it. The video was a very cheap insurance policy. It may have worked too well. No other college football fan base is nearly as paranoid about this issue.
You may now return to your flogging.