Veritate Duce Progredi
A man gotta have a code
- Messages
- 9,358
- Reaction score
- 5,352
I'm not following, but I agree. There are a ton of kids that go unnoticed or are ranked low, but have the talent to become better than their rankings if they put in the hard work and are coached properly. My point was more to the flaw in scoring a teams success in recruiting simply because a team took fewer recruits a particular season.
I understood your point. How would you fix it? Only go by average rating? Then a class of 7 - 5 stars is better than a class of 25 with 5 - 5 stars, 19 - 4 stars and a 3 star?
Or do you only count the highest 23? 22? so anything above that is thrown out? Do you start running weighted equations where the first 22 players carry a higher weight in a class score and the lowest three carry less so it gives a big class less weight?
I get pointing out problems but I'm more interested in proposed solutions. How would you handle it?