NDinL.A.
New member
- Messages
- 8,121
- Reaction score
- 1,734
LA... one question I've always had... how much is the rise of UCLA a threat to USC? Like if UCLA starts going on a run is it going to be an even recruiting matchup in Los Angeles? No doubt USC as a football power has more name recognition nationwide, but I've always wondered in So Cal how the two schools are viewed.
Camper is right, but I'll add this. USC football will always be king in L.A. in the same way UCLA basketball will always be king in L.A.
What I mean is, UCLA can make a dent into USC, a serious one, but if USC hires the right coach, it will always be ahead of UCLA in football. UCLA will have their years where they will be up on USC, but in the end, if USC is right, they are the top dog, even if both programs are doing well.
Also, just like there is a "ND type of kid", there is a USC type of kid that is succinctly different than a UCLA kid. I've talked to recruitniks and coaches in L.A. about it, and they agree. While the kids may overlap from time to time, there is definitely a difference overall. And even though I'm much more of a UCLA guy, the USC type kids (they have a certain swagger mixed in with some thug-life, if that makes sense) win football kids more than the UCLA type kids. Give them the right coach, and you get a Pete Carroll type of run.
Camper is right though, there is enough talent to be shared, but it's just not that often that the programs are good at the same time...

