ShawneeIrish
Well-known member
- Messages
- 1,325
- Reaction score
- 137
Who is YRC?
I assume he means Young Ray CharlesWho is YRC?
I assume he means Young Ray Charles
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
Serious question, do you expect Texas to have a better running attack based on their OL and RB personal than MSU? I assume MSU has a better rushing attack since their OL is expected to be better than Texas'.
Serious question, do you expect Texas to have a better running attack based on their OL and RB personal than MSU? I assume MSU has a better rushing attack since their OL is expected to be better than Texas'.
I do. Also, the scheme. Texas' offensive scheme put so much pressure on our DBs that it really put our front 7 in a disadvantage as well because we asked them to play out-of-whack.
Look, I can see how we lose MSU, and it's that we make mistakes and our young guys give up to many big plays. There is no way -- absolutely none -- that one can look at MSU group-by-group and think they match up with Notre Dame. You couldn't say that about Texas. I took a long look at Texas before that game was played and though "wow, we're probably screwed" mainly because they had such speed on the outside + insiders said their QB could sling it + talented backs + playmakers on D to get enough stops.
If Hunter plays for ND this weekend...
DBs-MSU
LB-ND
DL-ND
OL-ND
RB-ND
Receivers-ND
QB-ND
If we come out with the right scheme and the young DBs don't make mistakes we should boat race these low talent pretenders. Then again, Ohio State should've beat the living hell out of them last year and found a way to lose that game soooooo.....
Im very on board with this. I feel very very confident that we can put up a lot of points on MSU. I really like our OFFENSE. I have tons of confidence in Kizer primarily because his poise and decision making. Our D is what I'm worried about. If our D can build on an improved performance against Nevada and we can not give up big plays and finally get some pressure on the QB, we have a good chance at beating MSU at home. We need to tackle well and we need a solid effort from our defensive line. Texas and Nevada both got rid of the ball in passing situations very quickly but MSU gives more time for plays to develop so we should see more pressure on Saturday.I do. Also, the scheme. Texas' offensive scheme put so much pressure on our DBs that it really put our front 7 in a disadvantage as well because we asked them to play out-of-whack.
Look, I can see how we lose MSU, and it's that we make mistakes and our young guys give up to many big plays. There is no way -- absolutely none -- that one can look at MSU group-by-group and think they match up with Notre Dame. You couldn't say that about Texas. I took a long look at Texas before that game was played and though "wow, we're probably screwed" mainly because they had such speed on the outside + insiders said their QB could sling it + talented backs + playmakers on D to get enough stops.
If Hunter plays for ND this weekend...
DBs-MSU
LB-ND
DL-ND
OL-ND
RB-ND
Receivers-ND
QB-ND
If we come out with the right scheme and the young DBs don't make mistakes we should boat race these low talent pretenders. Then again, Ohio State should've beat the living hell out of them last year and found a way to lose that game soooooo.....
If we come out with the right scheme and the young DBs don't make mistakes we should boat race these low talent pretenders. Then again, Ohio State should've beat the living hell out of them last year and found a way to lose that game soooooo.....
LJ Scott scares me after that Texas game. He's a big back and our tackling is suspect. Expect him to have a pretty big game.
Aren't their LBs expected to be one of the best groups in the nation?
If we're in our 4-3 base, then we'll be fine.
I'd normally agree, but Texas had no issue pushing around our DLine in one-on-one battles
Not to mention, even when we got to the back, we were horrific in tackling.
I hope you're right...but based on what I"ve seen so far, I'm skeptical.
We were in 3-3-5 against Texas. We were at a disadvantage from the get go and that is not the defense you want to be in against a big back. Look at the Nevada game, we were in our base 4-3 and gave up just 99 yards on 30 carries (3.3 per rush). Stop the run and make that new QB beat you; besides Donnie Corley, I have never heard of anyone that caught a ball against Furman. I like our chances with our front seven being able to stop the run.
We were in 3-3-5 against Texas. We were at a disadvantage from the get go and that is not the defense you want to be in against a big back. Look at the Nevada game, we were in our base 4-3 and gave up just 99 yards on 30 carries (3.3 per rush). Stop the run and make that new QB beat you; besides Donnie Corley, I have never heard of anyone that caught a ball against Furman. I like our chances with our front seven being able to stop the run.
I'm going to have an extra ticket at face value if anyone is looking for a ticket. My buddy backed out so I'm pretty sure I'm flying solo to the game. Unsure what section or row, my guy gives me the tickets on gameday. DM me if interested. You'll be sitting next to me, as unfortunate as that sounds.
Does anyone need tickets to the game? I have become aware of several ND clubs that need to move their tickets (the price increase has been murder). PM me. Someone just wrote me with a request to move up to 12 in a block. I believe these are going at FV to alumni, probably a modest upcharge to non-alums. Not certain.
I'm curious if demand for tickets has dwindled as of late. I've bought tickets through the ticket office a number of times, and the last few years a representative has contacted me wishing to sell me season tickets or something. I assume I'd need to provide the mandatory donation, so I haven't bothered to return his calls, but this dude has called me several times this season already. Maybe they should reconsider the pricing strategy they've employed lately.
Does anyone need tickets to the game? I have become aware of several ND clubs that need to move their tickets (the price increase has been murder). PM me. Someone just wrote me with a request to move up to 12 in a block. I believe these are going at FV to alumni, probably a modest upcharge to non-alums. Not certain.
I'm going to have an extra ticket at face value if anyone is looking for a ticket. My buddy backed out so I'm pretty sure I'm flying solo to the game. Unsure what section or row, my guy gives me the tickets on gameday. DM me if interested. You'll be sitting next to me, as unfortunate as that sounds.
I would be interested in any lower bowl tickets at face value in 3, 4, 5, or 7 person blocks. (I am an alum)
I may be interested. Depends if I can get 3 together.
Yeah I know pricing has been a big part of it. They've literally doubled the price in just a few years. ND is a family school and it's hard to take a family at $150/game. Of course, you could argue that as a night game this isn't suited for that anyway, but young alumni can't really afford that either. It's just really dumb.
They should have sharp discounts for young alumni and alumni clubs (who use this as a key fundraiser and who underpin the whole 'best alumni association in the world' thing). They should also allow young alumni sections near the student sections. $150/game basically says, "Don't come home if you've chosen to do graduate/medical/law school." Then by the time you finish those programs, an annual game isn't a habit. That's how you kill a home sellout streak and alternate your (eventually) wealthiest alumni.
Stupid, stupid, stupid
Bull. Young alumni don't have mortgages or children. They can afford it. I'm a member of an alumni giving society and the cost of the ticket is a minuscule part of the cost of attending a Notre Dame game. The cost of actually getting to and staying in South Bend for a game weekend is much more cost-prohibitive.Yeah I know pricing has been a big part of it. They've literally doubled the price in just a few years. ND is a family school and it's hard to take a family at $150/game. Of course, you could argue that as a night game this isn't suited for that anyway, but young alumni can't really afford that either. It's just really dumb.
They should have sharp discounts for young alumni and alumni clubs (who use this as a key fundraiser and who underpin the whole 'best alumni association in the world' thing). They should also allow young alumni sections near the student sections. $150/game basically says, "Don't come home if you've chosen to do graduate/medical/law school." Then by the time you finish those programs, an annual game isn't a habit. That's how you kill a home sellout streak and alternate your (eventually) wealthiest alumni.
Stupid, stupid, stupid