Movies you just saw

PutuporShutup

Banned
Messages
4,824
Reaction score
1,909
What if I think both sides are snowflakes? If you care about the color of people in a terrible live action Disney movie (whether wanting them POC, or upset that they are POC), you need to touch grass.
So you want to pretend like this isn’t clearly race baiting by Disney …. Right

Need to touch reality if you think this was a “we picked the best” … instead this was clearly a here’s the race portfolio we want to have

I’m completely fine with Disney doing it, and I’m completely fine for people thinking Disney are being led by morons and don’t go see it
 

greyhammer90

the drunk piano player
Messages
16,838
Reaction score
16,117
So you want to pretend like this isn’t clearly race baiting by Disney …. Right

Need to touch reality if you think this was a “we picked the best” … instead this was clearly a here’s the race portfolio we want to have

I’m completely fine with Disney doing it, and I’m completely fine for people thinking Disney are being led by morons and don’t go see it

 

Lberry

Banned
Messages
2,285
Reaction score
1,875
You can often tell who has and who doesn't have kids by their level of awareness and/or concern over our societal slide towards Sodom Gamorrah.

At times. I've struggled with my faith but as I get older, I've become more convinced than ever that we will all meet the ultimate judge.
 

Jimmy3Putt

KooL
Messages
5,776
Reaction score
6,688
You can often tell who has and who doesn't have kids by their level of awareness and/or concern over our societal slide towards Sodom Gamorrah.

At times. I've struggled with my faith but as I get older, I've become more convinced than ever that we will all meet the ultimate judge.

You can tell who has kids and who probably touches kids.

Like the twisted fuck that said teaching my children about God and using it as a moral compass is comparable to sodomizing them.
 

Jimmy3Putt

KooL
Messages
5,776
Reaction score
6,688
It’s either they cast the dwarfs as normal-sized people, or they change the goofy nature of the dwarves so as to not offend the dwarfism community, which would ruin the story itself.

You’re in a no-win situation when you’re using that source material lol.

As for the tweet itself and the context about the multi-cultural cast?

Being mad that there aren’t enough white people, when the entirety of the Disney vault is pretty much white people or animals, is pretty snow-flakey, imo.

I support these remakes being cast with people of color.
The originals will always be there for generations to connect with them. My daughter sees Arial and Snow White as caucasian from the cartoons.
I think it's awesome to have young latino and asian girls see heroes and main characters that look like them.

I'd love to see a Miles Morales trilogy for the same reasons.
 

Bishop2b5

SEC Exchange Student
Messages
8,939
Reaction score
6,161
I support these remakes being cast with people of color.
The originals will always be there for generations to connect with them. My daughter sees Arial and Snow White as caucasian from the cartoons.
I think it's awesome to have young latino and asian girls see heroes and main characters that look like them.

I'd love to see a Miles Morales trilogy for the same reasons.
I get this and don't disagree, but the recasting of classics feels like pandering and is the very definition of cultural appropriation. Leave Ariel and Snow White alone and instead write good stories and make good movies about POC and create a new pantheon of heroes for them to admire.
 

Blazers46

Adjectives: wise/brilliant/handsome.
Messages
8,108
Reaction score
5,459
I support these remakes being cast with people of color.
The originals will always be there for generations to connect with them. My daughter sees Arial and Snow White as caucasian from the cartoons.
I think it's awesome to have young latino and asian girls see heroes and main characters that look like them.

I'd love to see a Miles Morales trilogy for the same reasons.
I agree but it needs to make sense. Casting needs to be historically accurate. Other than that, I agree. My 6 year olds favorite super hero he doesn’t even say “Spider-Man”, he says it’s “Miles Morales”.
 

sixstar

Well-known member
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2,064
And yet you abuse your own children by lying to them about “god,” filling their heads with falsehoods about heaven and hell and other superstitious bullshit.

As evil as the sexual abuse of children is, the brainwashing that is done by people like you, to those they supposedly love, is almost as depraved.

Jesus' two commandments were 1) to love God with all of your heart, soul, mind, and strength, and 2) love your neighbor as yourself.

Does that sound evil? I imagine that the world would be a pretty great place if people would love others as much as they love themselves. And yes, this is a commandment that Christians constantly fail. And no, acceptance is not the same as love.

Your view on God is warped by the brokenness of man.
 

IrishLion

I am Beyonce, always.
Staff member
Messages
19,128
Reaction score
11,077
I get this and don't disagree, but the recasting of classics feels like pandering and is the very definition of cultural appropriation. Leave Ariel and Snow White alone and instead write good stories and make good movies about POC and create a new pantheon of heroes for them to admire.

Ariel is a sea creature. Can you really appropriate that?

Overall I understand this perspective, though… it just doesn’t go very far because these stories are fairy tales. Adaptation is part of the game. They aren’t untouchable IP.
 

SeekNDestroy

Well-known member
Messages
3,340
Reaction score
4,526
Jesus' two commandments were 1) to love God with all of your heart, soul, mind, and strength, and 2) love your neighbor as yourself.

Does that sound evil? I imagine that the world would be a pretty great place if people would love others as much as they love themselves. And yes, this is a commandment that Christians constantly fail. And no, acceptance is not the same as love.

Your view on God is warped by the brokenness of man.
If only Christians behaved like Christ…
 

IrishLion

I am Beyonce, always.
Staff member
Messages
19,128
Reaction score
11,077
Debating the hypocrisy of religion, or debating those that want to call religion down in an intensive fashion, is okay if you want to take it to the theology thread… but we should avoid the direct insults and disgusting language there, too.
 

PutuporShutup

Banned
Messages
4,824
Reaction score
1,909
Saw new mission impossible

They could make this film 3 parts and 10 hours there’s so much content they could get into coupled with insane action and locations.

A very fast 2 hours and 45 minutes
 

Blazers46

Adjectives: wise/brilliant/handsome.
Messages
8,108
Reaction score
5,459
If only Christians behaved like Christ…
If all Christian’s behaved like Christ there would be no need for churches and pastors. Plus Christ got murdered just for being Christ. Damned if we do, damned if we don’t, right?
 

Blazers46

Adjectives: wise/brilliant/handsome.
Messages
8,108
Reaction score
5,459
Anyone have Prime? Looking for a good movie to stream tonight.
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2026!
Messages
31,523
Reaction score
17,407
Okay, I went and saw Sound of Freedom this evening. First off I'll say that I'm not a film critic. I generally am forgiving when it comes to entertainment value of movies, it has to be a real stinker for me to completely discredit it. This is a result of spending my 20s watching horrible B movies and laughing at their cheesy and low budget nature. That said, I think this film is excellent. I can't say really if it's the best film I've ever watched, but it's very good and it's powerful. It's certainly emotional. Again, I won't say that it is or isn't deserving of it's high praise from people online. It doesn't deserve to be torn down, not a bit, but ultimately that's up for each person to judge. I will say I generally don't care for "Based on True Story" adaptations. I liked this one a lot.

It's a different kind of film. From a plot standpoint someone may try to liken it to Taken because it's about a man trying to rescue a child(ren) from trafficking, but the atmosphere and vehicle for storytelling is no where close to that. There aren't a bunch of action scenes with a Liam Neeson type beating up bad guys along with explosions and gun shots. What there is in the film is suspense, tragedy, emotion, grit. There's not a boisterous ensemble of music by an orchestra, it's a very subdued film. There are times the movie is very silent, and that's when you notice things around you. After the beginning of the film there aren't people munching on popcorn, nobody is playing on their phone, people aren't whispering to themselves, it's dead silent. It was so quiet at times you could hear a pin drop in the room. I'm not sure I've ever seen an audience quite like that. The theatre I went to wasn't terribly large, it was an older one in a small town that rarely has more than 10-20 people for a showing. This room was packed almost every seat with probably close to 90-100 if I had to guess.

What this film doesn't have: there's no conspiracy theories, there's no politics, there's no mentions of QAnon. It's a mostly true story about a man trying to save some kids. That's it, plain and simple. Anyone trying to say otherwise is completely full of bullshit, 100%. Any critics trying to make such a connection are full of bullshit and pushing an agenda. If you don't believe me go see the film for yourself. There's no excuses not to. People are donating tickets to pay it forward so others can see the film. Maybe it won't be the best film you've ever seen, but I think it's certainly worth the watch. Anyone that is a parent or has a heart will have a hard time not being moved by the story.

Anyone trying to tear this film down that hasn't seen it, know that you don't have a leg to stand on. If you're just parroting what media outlets have said, you really need to see the film for yourself with an open mind and judge for yourself. That's the entire reason why I went to see the film tonight and this film doesn't deserve what these critics are doing. I've checked some sites to see what liberties they took with the story, and very little was changed. What was changed doesn't change the message or belittles what was done.

Go see the movie and make your own judgement like I did.
 
Last edited:

Blazers46

Adjectives: wise/brilliant/handsome.
Messages
8,108
Reaction score
5,459
Okay, I went and saw Sound of Freedom this evening. First off I'll say that I'm not a film critic. I generally am forgiving when it comes to entertainment value of movies, it has to be a real stinker for me to completely discredit it. This is a result of spending my 20s watching horrible B movies and laughing at their cheesy and low budget nature. That said, I think this film is very good. I can't say really if it's the best film I've ever watched, but it's very good and it's powerful. It's certainly emotional. Again, I won't say that it is or isn't deserving of it's high praise from people online. It doesn't deserve to be torn down, not a bit, but ultimately that's up for each person to judge. I will say I generally don't care for "Based on True Story" adaptations. I liked this one a lot.

It's a different kind of film. From a plot standpoint someone may try to liken it to Taken because it's about a man trying to rescue a child(ren) from trafficking, but the atmosphere and vehicle for storytelling is very different. There aren't a bunch of action scenes with a Leslie Nielsen type beating up bad guys along with explosions and gun shots. What there is in the film is suspense, tragedy, emotion, grit. There's not a boisterous ensemble of music by an orchestra, it's a very subdued film. There are times the movie is very silent, and that's when you notice things around you. After the beginning of the film there aren't people munching on popcorn, nobody is playing on their phone, people aren't whispering to themselves, it's dead silent. It was so quiet at times you could hear a pin drop in the room. I'm not sure I've ever seen an audience quite like that. The theatre I went to wasn't terribly large, it was an older one in a small town that rarely has more than 10-20 people for a showing. This room was packed almost every seat with probably close to 90-100 if I had to guess.

What this film doesn't have: there's no conspiracy theories, there's no politics, there's no mentions of QAnon. It's a mostly true story about a man trying to save some kids. That's it, plain and simple. Anyone trying to say otherwise is completely full of bullshit, 100%. Any critics trying to make such a connection are full of bullshit and pushing an agenda. If you don't believe me go see the film for yourself. There's no excuses not to. People are donating tickets to pay it forward so others can see the film. Maybe it won't be the best film you've ever seen, but I think it's certainly worth the watch. Anyone that is a parent or has a heart will have a hard time not being moved by the story.

Anyone trying to tear this film down that hasn't seen it, know that you don't have a leg to stand on. If you're just parroting what media outlets have said, you really need to see the film for yourself with an open mind and judge for yourself. That's the entire reason why I went to see the film tonight and this film doesn't deserve what these critics are doing. I've checked some sites to see what liberties they took with the story, and very little was changed. What was changed doesn't change the message or belittles what was done.

Go see the movie and make your own judgement like I did.
But the lead actor voted for Trump
 

goldandblue

Well-known member
Messages
3,721
Reaction score
419
Okay, I went and saw Sound of Freedom this evening. First off I'll say that I'm not a film critic. I generally am forgiving when it comes to entertainment value of movies, it has to be a real stinker for me to completely discredit it. This is a result of spending my 20s watching horrible B movies and laughing at their cheesy and low budget nature. That said, I think this film is very good. I can't say really if it's the best film I've ever watched, but it's very good and it's powerful. It's certainly emotional. Again, I won't say that it is or isn't deserving of it's high praise from people online. It doesn't deserve to be torn down, not a bit, but ultimately that's up for each person to judge. I will say I generally don't care for "Based on True Story" adaptations. I liked this one a lot.

It's a different kind of film. From a plot standpoint someone may try to liken it to Taken because it's about a man trying to rescue a child(ren) from trafficking, but the atmosphere and vehicle for storytelling is very different. There aren't a bunch of action scenes with a Leslie Nielsen type beating up bad guys along with explosions and gun shots. What there is in the film is suspense, tragedy, emotion, grit. There's not a boisterous ensemble of music by an orchestra, it's a very subdued film. There are times the movie is very silent, and that's when you notice things around you. After the beginning of the film there aren't people munching on popcorn, nobody is playing on their phone, people aren't whispering to themselves, it's dead silent. It was so quiet at times you could hear a pin drop in the room. I'm not sure I've ever seen an audience quite like that. The theatre I went to wasn't terribly large, it was an older one in a small town that rarely has more than 10-20 people for a showing. This room was packed almost every seat with probably close to 90-100 if I had to guess.

What this film doesn't have: there's no conspiracy theories, there's no politics, there's no mentions of QAnon. It's a mostly true story about a man trying to save some kids. That's it, plain and simple. Anyone trying to say otherwise is completely full of bullshit, 100%. Any critics trying to make such a connection are full of bullshit and pushing an agenda. If you don't believe me go see the film for yourself. There's no excuses not to. People are donating tickets to pay it forward so others can see the film. Maybe it won't be the best film you've ever seen, but I think it's certainly worth the watch. Anyone that is a parent or has a heart will have a hard time not being moved by the story.

Anyone trying to tear this film down that hasn't seen it, know that you don't have a leg to stand on. If you're just parroting what media outlets have said, you really need to see the film for yourself with an open mind and judge for yourself. That's the entire reason why I went to see the film tonight and this film doesn't deserve what these critics are doing. I've checked some sites to see what liberties they took with the story, and very little was changed. What was changed doesn't change the message or belittles what was done.

Go see the movie and make your own judgement like I did.

I did the same tonight and I could have typed this exact review. Well done movie with Zero politics. I was totally looking for and expecting some political edge and saw none.
 

Rasputin

1869 - Present
Messages
277
Reaction score
1,186
Okay, I went and saw Sound of Freedom this evening. First off I'll say that I'm not a film critic. I generally am forgiving when it comes to entertainment value of movies, it has to be a real stinker for me to completely discredit it. This is a result of spending my 20s watching horrible B movies and laughing at their cheesy and low budget nature. That said, I think this film is excellent. I can't say really if it's the best film I've ever watched, but it's very good and it's powerful. It's certainly emotional. Again, I won't say that it is or isn't deserving of it's high praise from people online. It doesn't deserve to be torn down, not a bit, but ultimately that's up for each person to judge. I will say I generally don't care for "Based on True Story" adaptations. I liked this one a lot.

It's a different kind of film. From a plot standpoint someone may try to liken it to Taken because it's about a man trying to rescue a child(ren) from trafficking, but the atmosphere and vehicle for storytelling is no where close to that. There aren't a bunch of action scenes with a Leslie Nielsen type beating up bad guys along with explosions and gun shots. What there is in the film is suspense, tragedy, emotion, grit. There's not a boisterous ensemble of music by an orchestra, it's a very subdued film. There are times the movie is very silent, and that's when you notice things around you. After the beginning of the film there aren't people munching on popcorn, nobody is playing on their phone, people aren't whispering to themselves, it's dead silent. It was so quiet at times you could hear a pin drop in the room. I'm not sure I've ever seen an audience quite like that. The theatre I went to wasn't terribly large, it was an older one in a small town that rarely has more than 10-20 people for a showing. This room was packed almost every seat with probably close to 90-100 if I had to guess.

What this film doesn't have: there's no conspiracy theories, there's no politics, there's no mentions of QAnon. It's a mostly true story about a man trying to save some kids. That's it, plain and simple. Anyone trying to say otherwise is completely full of bullshit, 100%. Any critics trying to make such a connection are full of bullshit and pushing an agenda. If you don't believe me go see the film for yourself. There's no excuses not to. People are donating tickets to pay it forward so others can see the film. Maybe it won't be the best film you've ever seen, but I think it's certainly worth the watch. Anyone that is a parent or has a heart will have a hard time not being moved by the story.

Anyone trying to tear this film down that hasn't seen it, know that you don't have a leg to stand on. If you're just parroting what media outlets have said, you really need to see the film for yourself with an open mind and judge for yourself. That's the entire reason why I went to see the film tonight and this film doesn't deserve what these critics are doing. I've checked some sites to see what liberties they took with the story, and very little was changed. What was changed doesn't change the message or belittles what was done.

Go see the movie and make your own judgement like I did.

Casting Leslie Nielson in a Taken spoof would have been great fun.
 
Top