notredomer23
Staph Member
- Messages
- 17,633
- Reaction score
- 17,557
Love this.
Thems fightin' cleatsDo those cleats in the upper right corner represent the Irsay Y? ND must be onto us...
I agree, I don't think the defensive eye test meets this ranking, but I also feel like ND is very solid on about 90% of their defensive snaps, but they have a tendency to break down on those long 90+yard drives and they have a mental lapse about once or twice every game and give up a huge play in the secondary. Just have to clean up those few mistakes.Very surprising to see the good guys ranked so high considering the lack of turnovers and havoc plays.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It depends on what the specific model values. For instance, SP+ measures success on a per-play basis. ND's defense does very well at landing its jabs consistently, so our success rate is high, and SP+ rates us higher than most. Efficiency metrics, like FEI, are drive-based, so we rate poorer there where the occasional lapse gives up big yards.I agree, I don't think the defensive eye test meets this ranking, but I also feel like ND is very solid on about 90% of their defensive snaps, but they have a tendency to break down on those long 90+yard drives and they have a mental lapse about once or twice every game and give up a huge play in the secondary. Just have to clean up those few mistakes.
Well said, I like the analogy Whiskey and I agree. Take away the mental errors, which could be either player miscommunications/gaffes or Golden not setting up the players for success, and the D will continue to improve.It depends on what the specific model values. For instance, SP+ measures success on a per-play basis. ND's defense does very well at landing its jabs consistently, so our success rate is high, and SP+ rates us higher than most. Efficiency metrics, like FEI, are drive-based, so we rate poorer there where the occasional lapse gives up big yards.
If you've got to pick one or the other, it's better to be landing your jabs consistently. Much easier for a defense to improve on its occasional uppercut or haymaker (or to simply take fewer such risks) than it is for a wild puncher to get better at the fundamentals. Assuming we get better production from our LBs going forward, we ought to finish as a top-10 unit.
This?Jon Burger of 18 Stripes just published a film breakdown of ND's two-back sets. His stuff is always worth reading.

I've been calling for the links to have a different color since we rolled out the new site!!!This?
[EDIT] I just realized there was a link hidden in your text. Tough to notice when the font colors are similar.![]()
I view IE in dark mode and there is no difference in color at all.I've been calling for the links to have a different color since we rolled out the new site!!!
To be fair, they ARE different colors. But that blue is super close to black. Maybe a bold or even a totally different color would help.
I think Tommy's calling card is pre-snap motions for eye candy and confusion. It is a difficult offense to prepare for because it forces the defenders to think, interpret, and decide in real time. I think the confusion helps hide some of our offensive warts.
Cmon Tommy. If I can read a defense in NCAA 14 on HEISMAN mode, why can't Drew do it real time?I'm not sure if they're actually letting Drew make the reads on the plays... but when ND lines up in pistol, and then motions someone across the formation, it helps inform Drew of the proper RPO read, as well.
But he may still be in the "Give it no matter what" or "Throw it to the flat no matter what" stage of playcalling, rather than actually reading it.
I think their “come to Jesus” moment is realizing they don’t have a QB that’s worth a fuck. They could’ve fixed that in the portal.So on the Thursday Irish Illustrated podcast, Pete Sampson said that Notre Dame is having their “come to Jesus moment” about the transfer portal. Is there real talk about rules being loosened or did I misunderstand that this was their own speculation?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I haven’t listened to the pod in question but Sampson has previously said he thinks they tried to get one this past offseason.I think their “come to Jesus” moment is realizing they don’t have a QB that’s worth a fuck. They could’ve fixed that in the portal.
I think they entertained the idea. But I think they ultimately decided on not wanting to hurt Tyler Buchner’s feelings. That turned out to be a fatal mistake, and one that they’ll never make again.I haven’t listened to the pod in question but Sampson has previously said he thinks they tried to get one this past offseason.
Decided to not hurt Buchner’s feelings or decided not to promise the job to someone like Kedon Slovis who they did not believe to be better than Buchner?I think they entertained the idea. But I think they ultimately decided on not wanting to hurt Tyler Buchner’s feelings. That turned out to be a fatal mistake, and one that they’ll never make again.
Always make your roster better. If that makes someone else upset and transfers, then who cares.
How is taking a transfer constitute “Chasing off Buchner”???Decided to not hurt Buchner’s feelings or decided not to promise the job to someone like Kedon Slovis who they did not believe to be better than Buchner?
Either way they should have taken one. And they should take one for next year. But chasing off Buchner in the process does not necessarily make the roster better.