I really don't think we can speculate on what was or wasn't Redfields. I believe he was released from the team based on too many transgressions. Whether he was "guilty" of having the gun or the weed didn't matter. He was supposed to be a senior leader and not be in that kind of situation based on his past mistakes.
its been pretty commonly reported it wasn't his gun.
There was a post yesterday (although only around for about a minute) that the gun most likely belonged to a PAST team member.
Speaking of said post. In the posting rules, i didnt see anything wrong with the post removed.
Sources were provided, and it seemed as or more legit than half the rumors that have been posted in relation to this situation. But I digress.
Anyways, the gun certainly doesn't appear to legally belong to any individual in the car. Could non-legal ownership have passed from one person to a person in that car, absolutely. I just dont think the comments of the gun not legally belonging to anyone in the car are legit, not speculation.
