Mike from ISD was absolutely livid about this news. And I can't blame him one damn bit. The pure hypocrisy of this move is infuriating, and if I'm ND, I don't let this stand. I'm putting the NCAA on blast. They can't continue to get away with this brutal corruption. First it was the vacating wins after the UNC debacle yielded zero penalty. Now Patterson is eligible for far less defensible reasons than Gilman, who was denied.
Again, I don't think Patterson is that good of a QB and he's basically expected to come in with nothing but fall experience, coming off a knee injury against a really good defense on the road at night. I'm honestly more confident in Wimbush and/or Book being prepared than I am Patterson being ready, especially since our OL appears better by a mile.
Patterson at Ole Miss had deceptively bad stats. By that I mean, he had 17 TD's to 9 INT's with 2259 yards passing. 166 of 260 (63.8%). That's good on paper, but keep in mind that he was 82/113 (72.4%) for 1169 yards and 13 TD's to 1 INT vs. UT Martin, South Alabama and Vanderbilt.
Meanwhile against the four toughest teams he faced last year:
@ Cal: 26/44 363 yards 2 TD/3 INT
@ Alabama: 14/29 165 yards 0 TD/2 INT
@ Auburn: 34/51 346 yards 2 TD/0 INT
vs. LSU: 10/23 116 yards 0 TD/3 INT
He was a total 84/147 (57.1%) 990 yards, 4 TD's and 8 INT's. And don't get too uneasy about the Auburn stats, because most of those numbers were made when the game was well out of hand. He was accurate in the first half, but his completions were mostly kept to 10 yards or less. By the time he got his TD drives, it was 38-3 Auburn and the game was pretty much over.
I think he's better than Peters or McCaffrey, but his track record against remotely decent or better teams is not favorable, and unlike Wimbush, he doesn't have the wheels to compensate for a low percentage passing game.