The 'independent' investigative report has been submitted to the BoT. Seems like Oscar is the only one who has looked at the report that does not have deep ties to OSU
See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Smell No Evil | Muppet Wiki | FANDOM powered by Wikia
![]()
It's amazing that they were able to complete this in two weeks in the metoo era while ND spent half a year, 3 investigative teams and criminal forensic technology to find out that a girl was helping some players write papers.
I think when it's all said and done, Jim Harbaugh is going to be very disappointed.
Well, the last page of the report covers that; nothing like a good can of white paint... (#whitewash)
https://goo.gl/images/zrt2sS
Yes, he will more than likely be disappointed early this week, and also be disappointed for the 4th straight season on November 24th
I'm not sure he does survive.
1. The committee that investigated aren't all OSU biased.
I'm not sure he does survive.
1. The committee that investigated aren't all OSU biased.
2. OSU has a history of protecting their football image.
3. If that report recommends UM be released, he'll be gone. Pieces of the report will eventually leak somewhere. OSU can't afford to go against a firing recommendation and later have it leaked they went against the committee. Bad publicity.
4. AD will be gone regardless.
5. Holtman had a lady come in and address the bball team on treating women with respect. He invited all other athletes to attend. Holtman set a high bar for other OSU coaches. May not look good to keep UM on board with Holtman representing what a HC should be.
Certainly not all of the committee was OSU biased, but there were enough players involved that had ties to make you wonder. Some of the other members weren't directly tied to OSU per say, but they were government officials in Ohio that may still have ties indirectly. Point is, they touted this as an "independent" investigation, but it surely isn't.
That said, I agree with most of your other points, and to that end I'm not sure how this will go. I could see the committee going either way. Tressel got let go basically for the same reason, lying, but the circumstances were a little different since the NCAA was directly involved with the tattoo investigation. Also, a lot of people in Columbus were getting tired of Tressel at that time due to the fact he got completely flattened in back to back NCG appearances after his win against Miami. His defenses were strong, but his offenses were blander than vanilla in an era where the Spread was being adopted everywhere.
I think this is the biggest difference between the two situations. It seemed like Tressel's time in C-bus was up and tattoo-gate was a convenient out.
To me it's about control. No CEO can speak for the personal choices individual workers make in their personal life. But when that CEO 1) becomes aware of potential serious issues and 2) interjects himself in said dispute, the excuse is void.
I know many of OSU fans that insist there was no conviction, so what was Urban to do? Well, for one, don't hire the guy to OSU. Two, don't give him the highest rating possible in his 2015 performance review for (paraphrasing the wording) "representing the University in the highest regard". Don't extend his contract. Don't lie about it. Urban clearly didn't control the situation and now it comes out that Smith's sexual encounters and novelties in the football offices included everything short of a Sybian. Meyer can't make the decisions for Smith, but he loses the right to claim "well, he wasn't convicted, so...." when he chose to hire him back. Meyer didn't have control (like at UF).
Wonder who is the first to decommit. Does anyone really want to be associated with this?
The majority of people pretend to care about morals.
Certainly not all of the committee was OSU biased, but there were enough players involved that had ties to make you wonder. Some of the other members weren't directly tied to OSU per say, but they were government officials in Ohio that may still have ties indirectly. Point is, they touted this as an "independent" investigation, but it surely isn't.
.
The irony of firing Gene Smith
Will this mean that OSU will hire a AD who will be all over UM on every little issue and transgression going forward?
Not a chance in hell.
The irony of firing Gene Smith
Will this mean that OSU will hire a AD who will be all over UM on every little issue and transgression going forward?
Not a chance in hell.
Right. What kind of message do you send if you fire Gene Smith but keep Urban Meyer? You might as well just hand him the keys to the university.
Depends. What is Urban reported it to Gene, but Gene did nothing or told him to stand down? Sure. Urban still shoulders the blame to a degree. But Gene is the one who failed more in his role in that scenario.
This will be the stance of all pOSU fans. I'm not sure if it will stand up to the scrutiny as most outsiders will rightfully point out that Urban is one with all the power in the relationship with Gene Smith.
Depends. What is Urban reported it to Gene, but Gene did nothing or told him to stand down? Sure. Urban still shoulders the blame to a degree. But Gene is the one who failed more in his role in that scenario.
Gene Smith could have - and probably should have, though we don’t yet know - done more. But assistant coaches work for the head coach, not the AD. Whatever Smith knew, it’s safe to assume Meyer knew as well. Even if Meyer fulfilled his Title IX reporting obligation and met the letter of his contract, he’s the one responsible for his staff and kept Zach Smith on his sideline and in his locker room. I don’t see how this is only Gene Smith’s fault.
Agree. Hence my prediction that they will put the focus on Gene and make him the fall guy but still hit Urban with a suspension.
I agree I would bet that’s what they WILL do. I do not think it’s what they SHOULD do. It effectively absolves the head coach of responsibility for his own assistants.