NDdomer2
Local Sports vBookie
- Messages
- 17,050
- Reaction score
- 3,875
So, this case finally wrapped up and the jury is deliberating right now. I read a lot of conflicting things as to which side made the better argument. From the start, I thought he would get off (although I believe he is guilty) due to the fact that there is no weapon and no motive.
Hernandez has a good team of lawyers. I'll link an article below, but it seems like they made the better closing argument today than the State did.
It's been a very odd trial all around. A bomb threat took place, Robert Kraft took the stand, as did Hernandez's girlfriend....so did a guy who was shot in the eye by Hernandez in a separate incident. A PCP "expert" was brought in, and, finally, the Hernandez defense team today admitted that Aaron was at the scene of the murder but that he did not commit the murder himself. Could be a genius move by them to throw that admission out there so late.
http://sports.yahoo.com/news/aaron-...quit-former-nfl-star-of-murder-151851106.html
I don't think they were admitting anything that evidence didn't already show. His cell phone triangulation put him there as did his and the deceased's DNA on a joint roach found at scene of crime.
However, theres no evidence showing who pulled the trigger. But if they cant prove which one did it doesn't the court usually decide to punish all involved?