dude, that signature has to go
The worst thing is that sig is totally staged for that kid to do that. Which doesn't make it funny at all
dude, that signature has to go
Dude has been producing for two seasons now. Just because he doesn't get sacks doesn't mean he's not producing.
The amount of crazy and different emotions on display is entertaining. Shes goes from possibly anxious, to amped, to angry, then to crazy, back to angry, to determined...so much insanity. I would assume it's Stanford's band based on the weird shit going on, but they don't have uniforms if I recall.Not yet. Their court date is set for August 30th, so I think the University will probably wait to see what shakes out from that.
I don't mind the sig. It's overly large, and it's all staged and whatnot, but she certainly gets into her partThe amount of crazy and different emotions on display is entertaining. Shes goes from possibly anxious, to amped, to angry, then to crazy, back to angry, to determined...so much insanity. I would assume it's Stanford's band based on the weird shit going on, but they don't have uniforms if I recall.
Is it really? That is incredibly fast.
I don't mind the sig. It's overly large, and it's all staged and whatnot, but she certainly gets into her partThe amount of crazy and different emotions on display is entertaining. Shes goes from possibly anxious, to amped, to angry, then to crazy, back to angry, to determined...so much insanity. I would assume it's Stanford's band based on the weird shit going on, but they don't have uniforms if I recall.
Our annual "should Mcgriff change his sig" debate. Now I know the season is near!
It doesn't really bother me (although, past ones certainly have), but if it's the Stanford band. Then it must go. There is no place on this site for anything that supports a band that came on our field and depicted the Potato Famine.
It's a band based out of Boston IIRC
So while the University sits on it, are the 4 kids OK to play in the meantime? I would assume they can since BK is not suspending them. So let's say the University decided on Oct 1st that they sit 3 games. They're good to play up until Oct 1st, correct?
So we'll see them against Texas unless University does something before then.
That's the way I understand it. However, BK may ultimately decide at the last minute to not step on any toes in the admin, and sit them out until there's a resolution.
I get the thought process, but that's a scary precedent to set. What if the University sits on their ass about it for 6 weeks, and finds them 6 weeks later good to go. BK will have them for half of the season. I'm using an extreme example, but after the frozen 5 who knows.
we should have a better idea in 5 days tho when they have initial hearings. That would give the University an idea of the maximum offense each student would get.
I suppose. Too bad their initial hearing wasn't right away like Butler's.
Any chance they come out of an initial hearing without a charge, or is a charge imminent, it just depends what the charge is?
Since it's a small matter, will it be charged and no fight/further court hearings? Having weed I see as something along the lines of a speeding ticket, where you go there one time, hope for some leniency, but inevitably leave knowing your exact fate without follow up hearings. But I've never been part of the court process.
Probably depends if someone has owned up. Some could potentially have no charges if an individual or individuals man up.
So while the University sits on it, are the 4 kids OK to play in the meantime? I would assume they can since BK is not suspending them. So let's say the University decided on Oct 1st that they sit 3 games, they're still playing versus Texas/Nevada/MSU I assume.
• Kelly said White, Coney, Williams and Stepherson have all been practicing with the team since workouts resumed Monday and all four will be available to play against Texas, provided the Office of Community Standards doesn’t see otherwise.
I'm pretty sure the OCS will see it a different way.
I doubt it. Max was largely responsible for this entire incident, and he's already been dealt with (regarding NDFB at least). That's why Kelly is sticking his neck out for the other four. So as long as Fulton County doesn't decide to f*ck them over, they ought to receive nothing harsher than a plea bargain for community service.
I doubt it. Max was largely responsible for this entire incident, and he's already been dealt with (regarding NDFB at least). That's why Kelly is sticking his neck out for the other four. So as long as Fulton County doesn't decide to f*ck them over, they ought to receive nothing harsher than a plea bargain for community service.
Honest question: how confident are you on this?
cant speak for Whiskey, but the actions and comments from BK seem to make it pretty obvious.