Booslum31
New member
- Messages
- 5,687
- Reaction score
- 187
It wont be long![]()
I hope that you are right...I love this guy's game!
It wont be long![]()
I hope that you are right...I love this guy's game!
Why is it, sometimes, that a recruit's star power and offer lists are seemingly so far out of whack? They have this kid listed as a 3-star, but to me, that offer list is pretty damn impressive!
and 5
ratings to go around, and for marketing reasons, the recruiting services have an incentive to spread them around regionally. So lots of very promising prospects in those deep talent states end up at a 3
rating by default. But when a 3
kid like Perry starts getting lots of attention from elite programs, the recruiting services will give him a closer look. If he dances to their tune (by attending camps, giving interviews, helping them build hype, etc.) they'll frequently give him a bump.I wanted to ask you guys who are WAY more knowledgeable than me about all things recruiting... Perry's thread seemed to be the perfect place for the query, as he's a solid example of what confuses me:
Why is it, sometimes, that a recruit's star power and offer lists are seemingly so far out of whack? They have this kid listed as a 3-star, but to me, that offer list is pretty damn impressive!
I follow recruiting through you guys, and your great insights, so I don't put a lot of stock in those star ratings, but I'm just curious how it happens that, apparently, top schools see an athlete as someone they really want, but the recruiting services don't reflect that love.
I wanted to ask you guys who are WAY more knowledgeable than me about all things recruiting... Perry's thread seemed to be the perfect place for the query, as he's a solid example of what confuses me:
Why is it, sometimes, that a recruit's star power and offer lists are seemingly so far out of whack? They have this kid listed as a 3-star, but to me, that offer list is pretty damn impressive!
I follow recruiting through you guys, and your great insights, so I don't put a lot of stock in those star ratings, but I'm just curious how it happens that, apparently, top schools see an athlete as someone they really want, but the recruiting services don't reflect that love.
Great question... not sure I know the answer, but here's what I tend to see when someone has a "who's who" offer list but three star rating:
1. They're a "raw" prospect so they're rated lower because their film doesn't justify them being rated higher or they're simply playing a position in HS that is different than what DI colleges project them at. Colleges are willing to gamble because of their upside. OR
2. They're from a prominent school/recruiting area which makes it easy for colleges to have scouted them or know their coach and extend an an early offer. OR
3. They don't really have all those offers, but have "reported" that they do... this is sometimes done to drum up interest with other schools. Like if a kid from Michigan thinks they're close to an offer from Michigan, they might report offers/interest from MSU, OSU, or ND to make them seem in demand. Coby Fleener from Stanford had eye opening stuff to say about marketing yourself if you're not a "national" recruit.
someone posted something in regards to perry being a silent commit and Sharpley 247 just put a smiley face and then said he was was impressive in person too ...tifwiw
Can schools send/give recruits memorabilia? In Sampsons last retweet of him you can see what looks to be ND gloves and cleats? Also a few other team's colors of gloves and cleats.
Can schools send/give recruits memorabilia? In Sampsons last retweet of him you can see what looks to be ND gloves and cleats? Also a few other team's colors of gloves and cleats.
i saw that to from last year's shamrock series...idk
Maybe it was part of the program for Irish Invasion camp, was there a fee to attend that camp?