This is an incredibly silly post. The problem isn't that he has a past of excessive force, civil rights violations, and questionable police reports to justify these actions... the problem is that he has that past and his story doesn't add up with a lot of first hand witness accounts and some common sense.
It seems equally probable at this point that Devin Butler was defending a girl who was getting kicked in the head by his girlfriend the cop misinterpreted what was going on and assaulted him... as it is that the cop's story as written is true.
Cool so if it turns out that a cop tackled him for basically no reason, what is he guilty of? I'll wait.
I don't think it's silly at all. LOL
First, you are just assuming, based on "eyewitnesses" that he did nothing wrong but break up a fight. Would you like me to go into how credible and reliable a bunch of intoxicated college kids are? Oh, and I bet they aren't bias at all against police.....
You claim common sense...yet you believe some cops just walked up and assaulted him for trying to break up a fight. I'm saying that Butler was likely a bit tipsey and agitated leaving the bar and seeing his girl fighting, and when a cop put his hands on him to move him out of the way, he shoved the cop and got into it with him.
Now tell me what sounds more like common sense?
Also he wasn't the only cop there. As much as you want to link everything together to discredit this guy, I bet I could dig up dirt on Butler and label him in the same manner. Also, should we go ahead and label Williams, Coney, and the other two while we're at it...Pot smoking idiots who shouldn't be trusted from now on?
Look, maybe he doesn't get charged...and then Kelly can do whatever he feels is necessary...but you can bet that if this was some kid on Stanford, we'd be blowing him up about it.
I feel that we should cut ties and move on from Butler. I've seen the term "ND men" more than once on my short time here and Butler is clearly not a good representation of that term