irishnd31
Biggest Idiot On This Site
- Messages
- 6,208
- Reaction score
- 8,088
Clearly not, because the correct response is "and with your spirit". Duh
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
Back in 2011 I believe. It's the more literal translation of the Latin.Seriously though, when did that change lol.
All through high school (~2006) the response was "And also with you."
I was explaining to my coworkers the "May the Fourth Be with You"/"And also with you" Catholic-Star-Wars joke, but then had to explain that the response changed at some point.
I think I just confused them.
It's a prototype armor they created before Empire.Is that Hoth Boba Fett?
It's a prototype armor they created before Empire.
I don't think they actually ever intended for it to be white. They just built it to get the equipment fitted and see how it would look on film.Good change. Would've been too similar to Stormtrooper armor with the color scheme, considering everybody was a Star Wars noob at the time.
Wizards you would know this: there has been a running debate on Boba Fett's armor. Does he have Wookie scalps braided slung over his shoulder, or Padwe braids? I've heard both, and was wondering if there was ever a definitive ruling.
There's no definitive answer since this source is not canon, but this image is considered a fairly solid depiction of his outfit.Wizards you would know this: there has been a running debate on Boba Fett's armor. Does he have Wookie scalps braided slung over his shoulder, or Padwe braids? I've heard both, and was wondering if there was ever a definitive ruling.
I just want everyone to know that it's my birthday. Yes, today. I'm a better fan than any of you.
I would have guessed you were a Taurus. Happy B Day!
Wizards you would know this: there has been a running debate on Boba Fett's armor. Does he have Wookie scalps braided slung over his shoulder, or Padwe braids? I've heard both, and was wondering if there was ever a definitive ruling.
Hmm I don't see it, but I'm sure they casted him for a reason
New 'Star Wars' villains not evil enough, says Vatican movie critic
Was this ever brought up? I found it pretty funny, and also accurate.
Nah. Ren doesn't seem as evil because he's so conflicted. That's good character development. Evil characters shouldn't be one-dimensional.
Note: I don't think Vader and the Emperor were one-dimensional. They were just different.
I don't know if this is spoilers or not, but if so, here's your warning.
Ren is conflicted, but he's conflicted because he wants to be evil. I can't recall another reason given within the film. Personally, I thought that Driver was by far the best performance in VII, but at the same time, Ren seems pretty weak as far as actual depth. The review nails Snoke perfectly, because in my mind, I could not understand what he's supposed to be other than some mysterious big bad.
I think my main issue is that these two villains are intentionally echoing Vader and Palpatine, but fall very short. I like the direction that Ren is heading, but he's still a very pale comparison to A New Hope Vader.
What am I missing? I'm legitimately trying to understand.
ETA: Oscar Isaac was a close second for my favorite performance.
Ren should pale in comparison to a New Hope Vader because Ren is not as far along in his journey to the dark side as Vader.