Maybe I'm just grumpy today, but when I read this post in reference to Day, I couldn't help but smirk a bit.
Is Day really as good, right now, as we all seem to believe? Or are we all actually just referencing his potential? You get on CB for talking about Jones in the same breath as Day based on potential, and yet, I feel the argument could be made that Day has come nowhere close to his own potential. I don't even think Day has really been the dominant force, even when healthy, that some make it sound.
Sure, he has shown flashes the past two seasons, when healthy, and he does command regular double-teams, when healthy... but he still hasn't come close to the player that everyone thought he would be after his national championship showing in 2012. He was supposed to be the next great DL... and instead, we've seen a guy with huge potential that has shown flashes of an elite first step, but has actually been banged up more than he's been healthy.
I in no way want to pile on Day, because even when he's not healthy he's still a quality defensive linemen, and he really *could* be one of the best in the country if he can stay healthy and do more than just show flashes. But I think it's crazy to blast Balki for his beliefs on how potential plays into an evaluation in reference to Jones, when 90% of Day's hype is about potential, as well.
Day has proven more on the field, yes. But he's not light-years ahead of the other guys, and it's not unreasonable to question if other d-linemen are closer to his level than we think.