woolybug25
#1 Vineyard Vines Fan
- Messages
- 17,677
- Reaction score
- 3,018
"Injuries, transfers, and the NFL will wreck this projection"
How can we all agree that missing out on a stud like Clark isn't a huge deal because of ND's great TE depth, but not take the same approach to Eason (whom ND hasn't even missed out on)? Put me on the record as saying I want Eason's commitment, I guess I'm just preemptively talking people off the edge should he decide to not be Irish.
2013: Zaire.9268 #5 DQB
2014: Kizer.9073 #12 PQB
2015: Barnett.9628 #3 PQB
2016: Eason?.9984 #1 PQB
Yep, he's a stud, but the other guys aren't slouches.
I don't think anyone was disagreeing with you about our depth. We'll be fine without Eason and we are even in a good position with other elite '16 QB's too. But that's neither here nor there.
Where we disagreed was where you projected who the starting QB would be for the next five years and the comment that it was probable that he wouldn't play until his 5th year. That type of projection is completely innacurate based off of historical flow of the depth chart.
If it wasn't... Then Golson would have been our QB last year, Rees would have never played a snap and Clausen would have been BK's first QB.
Last edited:

