Who cares... whoever wins that series is just going to get swept by the Birds anyhow...
I remember you saying the same thing about the NLCS last year. How'd that work out for ya?
Do we really want to go over how the Birds have treated me over history?
I would say that disapointment isn't a common theme in Cardsland...
Met Tim Brown on Wednesday and he told me ND wins by atleast two tds
Who cares... whoever wins that series is just going to get swept by the Birds anyhow...
<iframe src="//www.youtube.com/embed/pUsgwN5KjiU" allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" width="420"></iframe>
Ray Lankford ande Ron Gant absolutely owned the Braves during the first 4 games of the 96 NLCS...
too bad the cards got outscored 107-2 in the final three games...
ZIP EM UP!!!!
Kershaw is going to give the Dodgers a chance to win tonight, the only question is can the Dodgers' swing the bat and give him some support; if they can score 4+ runs, I like the Dodgers chances tonight.
If the Dodgers make it to Game 7, Hyun-Jin Ryu is a deceptively good pitcher; he had his worst outing of the year in game 3 against the Braves (dodgers still won 13-6) but Game 7 anything can happen....and Pájaros Rojos did give up a 3-1 lead last year in the NLCS
107 runs????
Sweet thread about the MLB playoffs....thread title kinda misleading though
Sweet thread about the MLB playoffs....thread title kinda misleading though
It's encoded... use your MLB spy glasses and a blacklight the title actually makes perfect sense...
I can't say about always but my coaches always took them off during practice so they don't lose them somewhere on the field.
He usually does these shortly after Thursday practice so maybe hasn't put it back on yet.
Interesting, Kelly says that Dan Fox "won't come off the field" on Saturday. But apparently Schmidt will also play. Curious how that will play out.
Interesting, Kelly says that Dan Fox "won't come off the field" on Saturday. But apparently Schmidt will also play. Curious how that will play out.
Yeah, there has been a bunch of interesting linebacker talk over the last couple of weeks, including how someone said that Kendall Moore was out, or something to that effect. Kelly said in his most recent presser that Moore was playing, so I am confused about anything linebacker related, right now.
Presumably for the same reason Schmidt saw the field over Moore against ASU; he's better in coverage. Just a situational thing.
I think Moore is still the next-man-in at MILB should Calabrese go down, but Schmidt is apparently better in coverage, so he's more likely to get subbed in on certain packages.
Big Lou just tweeted "Green #winning" LOL
Big Lou just tweeted "Green #winning" LOL