Pops Freshenmeyer
Well-known member
- Messages
- 5,112
- Reaction score
- 2,457
Against better judgement before this 77-year old heads towards bed:
A). Don't understand the Project Mogul question. That was used as an explanation for Roswell and almost nothing else in UFOlogy. We know where all the Moguls were launched and what their tracks were. The hi-tech balloon theory (a better more inclusive way of phrasing this as it brings other projects to bear) for Roswell does not handle the case well at all because:
1]. there are no such launches recorded at proper times and going in proper directions;
2]. the area coverage of a Mogul balloon train comes nowhere near matching the description of the coverage of the "debris field" on the Foster Ranch as described by both military and civilian witnesses. (let alone the odd qualities of the metals.)
Something technological might have splattered down on that ranch but Mogul wasn't it (the rancher was quite familiar with weather balloons gone astray and had returned at least one to the military earlier.)
A guy at the Office of Naval Research (Urner Liddel) published a debunking article in around 1950 stating that all the ufos were explainable by similar balloon flights. Everyone in the military was confused by this article as none of the military agencies believed that practically any of the cases were balloons. It is a peculiarity of the field that in the 1948-1952+ years one of the most intriguing clusters of unexplained cases came from exactly the hi-tech balloon launchers and trackers who would know. (almost as if the phenomenon, whatever it is, was thumbing its nose at the best observers we had.)
B). On modern photos: There have never been detailed, close-up (non-hoax) photos of ufos --- make of that what you will, but it's almost as if you can't get a close encounter during the day, and not at night when someone has a camera ready. Distant objects are photographed all the time. One of my best friends has analyzed some Puerto Rico film left right and center by the highest technological means. His analysis "debunks all the debunkers" as it shows that all the mundane things proposed do not handle the data. Still: it is a distant object and tells you nothing but that here is an apparent object which resists conventional explanations.
Good evening.
Thank you for the response. Project Mogul was vaguely cited as the cause of the burst of public interest in UFOs in the 1950s by (maybe) Robert Park or Martin Gardener. They obviously come at such issues with extreme skepticism so I don't want to swallow the argument whole.