You prove my point. Slavery, voting rights, etc... but here we are.
It really is a slippery slope. I typed out several lengthy replies, read them over, decided they might be inflammatory to some and deleted all of them.
Really, what is a terrorist? Over the course of history I would opine that virtually every nation state could be called a terrorist or guilty of terrorist activities.
Similar to what a judge wrote about pornography a while back, I personally can't define terrorism but I know it when I see it.
I also recognize that indigenous peoples see most of us as "visitors" and "intruders" and many of them believe we are terrorists. I don't think it is as black and white as many of us would like to believe.
What's the answer and path forward? I honestly don't know. This has been going on for thousands of years.
The events that transpired last week were a bloody disgrace and I personally believe Trump was THE instigator.
Be good to each other. Respect one another and do good in your community. That's all I have.
Cheers and Go Irish!!
I do not think there is anything a politician can do to change this. Looking to government to solve social issues is a fools errand.
THIS is what I am talking about.
Did you guys happen to see Ben Sasse's speech on January 6th? It was the most clear-eyed thing I have heard in at least 5 years.
Did you guys happen to see Ben Sasse's speech on January 6th? It was the most clear-eyed thing I have heard in at least 5 years.
These cultural shifting movements themselves are top down movements that exist as a result of our goverment and politicians, or perhaps it's more accurate to say the elite who own our politicians/government.
The greatest mistake the right has made in my lifetime, and I'm guilty of this myself, is to make believe the federal government can't accomplish anything. That's just libertarian think tank nonsense, and anyone with an IQ above a toaster recognizes it as soon as they pull themselves away from the libertarian/conservative bullshit talking points.
The feds have manipulated the right into believing bombing deserts and using the CIA to overthrow governments will make us safer. Meanwhile they have convinced the left that mass immigration is good for the working man. I'm not trying to debate either - my point is that the feds are shaping both our culture and the cultures of other nations with these two policies alone.
The right has been sitting around the last year asking themselves what the hell is going on out here and the answer is very simple. They reject or deny the power of the federal government. We expect our elected leaders to hold office. The left fully understands the power and they embrace it. They expect their politicians to wield power and shift the culture to fit their worldview.
In my opinion, this is by design. Our elite can comfortably stuff their pockets with a "hands off" economic policy that is peddled by the right combined with a hands on approach to changing the culture that is peddled by the left.
This strikes me as a neverending cycle that won't break until the right wakes up to the fact that they're nothing more than irrelevant tax cattle grazing in land that doesn't touch an ocean and the left realizes that using every hole in your body as a sex organ doesnt make you free. If/when that happens, we can get the party started.
These cultural shifting movements themselves are top down movements that exist as a result of our goverment and politicians, or perhaps it's more accurate to say the elite who own our politicians/government.
The greatest mistake the right has made in my lifetime, and I'm guilty of this myself, is to make believe the federal government can't accomplish anything. That's just libertarian think tank nonsense, and anyone with an IQ above a toaster recognizes it as soon as they pull themselves away from the libertarian/conservative bullshit talking points.
The feds have manipulated the right into believing bombing deserts and using the CIA to overthrow governments will make us safer. Meanwhile they have convinced the left that mass immigration is good for the working man. I'm not trying to debate either - my point is that the feds are shaping both our culture and the cultures of other nations with these two policies alone.
The right has been sitting around the last year asking themselves what the hell is going on out here and the answer is very simple. They reject or deny the power of the federal government. We expect our elected leaders to hold office. The left fully understands the power and they embrace it. They expect their politicians to wield power and shift the culture to fit their worldview.
In my opinion, this is by design. Our elite can comfortably stuff their pockets with a "hands off" economic policy that is peddled by the right combined with a hands on approach to changing the culture that is peddled by the left.
This strikes me as a neverending cycle that won't break until the right wakes up to the fact that they're nothing more than irrelevant tax cattle grazing in land that doesn't touch an ocean and the left realizes that using every hole in your body as a sex organ doesnt make you free. If/when that happens, we can get the party started.
I don't buy that, personally. The right knows what power the federal government wields, or I should say what the lack of federal government enables. But before I get into it, I think we all need to agree that the general public is nothing more than a herd of sheep and the flock is fed by emotion. That emotion is manipulated by how they govern.
With that said, the left/right struggle you mention has taken many shapes and forms, but has persisted since the early 1800's. But there are critical turning points , starting with the Voting Rights Act of 1965. That started what is seemingly an endless cycle of "gerrymandering" that has ended up in non-sensical districts that are drawn for the sole purpose of power, not voter choice. Both parties do it, but the by product of 50+ years of trying to concentrate power has led to a concentrated electorate that has polarized and shifted more and more to the extremes over the years. Those who truly are in the middle (conservative fiscally/socially, liberal socially/fiscally) don't really have candidates that match their political views. That's how you end up with some of socialistic left iand the Q believers in office. The extreme differences of the two have lead to the flock seeing each other as enemies, not neighbors. The emotions run high and they refuse to give in to their enemies. We just have so much of it now and they can communicate via social media to reaffirm their craziness.
It's all about power. But I genuinely do not believe that the "elite" is conspiring on this. It's just all they know. Long gone are the Biden or McCains where compromise was not only normal, but expected. Compromise now, you are primaried out because how dare you. It's how these people have been elected, so it's how they govern. The only solution is to redraw district lines based on voter turnout in the previous election. The goal is to get 50/50 representation so that we don't get the jackasses we have today.
These cultural shifting movements themselves are top down movements that exist as a result of our goverment and politicians, or perhaps it's more accurate to say the elite who own our politicians/government.
The greatest mistake the right has made in my lifetime, and I'm guilty of this myself, is to make believe the federal government can't accomplish anything. That's just libertarian think tank nonsense, and anyone with an IQ above a toaster recognizes it as soon as they pull themselves away from the libertarian/conservative bullshit talking points.
The feds have manipulated the right into believing bombing deserts and using the CIA to overthrow governments will make us safer. Meanwhile they have convinced the left that mass immigration is good for the working man. I'm not trying to debate either - my point is that the feds are shaping both our culture and the cultures of other nations with these two policies alone.
The right has been sitting around the last year asking themselves what the hell is going on out here and the answer is very simple. They reject or deny the power of the federal government. We expect our elected leaders to hold office. The left fully understands the power and they embrace it. They expect their politicians to wield power and shift the culture to fit their worldview.
In my opinion, this is by design. Our elite can comfortably stuff their pockets with a "hands off" economic policy that is peddled by the right combined with a hands on approach to changing the culture that is peddled by the left.
This strikes me as a neverending cycle that won't break until the right wakes up to the fact that they're nothing more than irrelevant tax cattle grazing in land that doesn't touch an ocean and the left realizes that using every hole in your body as a sex organ doesnt make you free. If/when that happens, we can get the party started.
I don't buy that, personally. The right knows what power the federal government wields, or I should say what the lack of federal government enables. But before I get into it, I think we all need to agree that the general public is nothing more than a herd of sheep and the flock is fed by emotion. That emotion is manipulated by how they govern.
With that said, the left/right struggle you mention has taken many shapes and forms, but has persisted since the early 1800's. But there are critical turning points , starting with the Voting Rights Act of 1965. That started what is seemingly an endless cycle of "gerrymandering" that has ended up in non-sensical districts that are drawn for the sole purpose of power, not voter choice. Both parties do it, but the by product of 50+ years of trying to concentrate power has led to a concentrated electorate that has polarized and shifted more and more to the extremes over the years. Those who truly are in the middle (conservative fiscally/socially, liberal socially/fiscally) don't really have candidates that match their political views. That's how you end up with some of socialistic left iand the Q believers in office. The extreme differences of the two have lead to the flock seeing each other as enemies, not neighbors. The emotions run high and they refuse to give in to their enemies. We just have so much of it now and they can communicate via social media to reaffirm their craziness.
It's all about power. But I genuinely do not believe that the "elite" is conspiring on this. It's just all they know. Long gone are the Biden or McCains where compromise was not only normal, but expected. Compromise now, you are primaried out because how dare you. It's how these people have been elected, so it's how they govern. The only solution is to redraw district lines based on voter turnout in the previous election. The goal is to get 50/50 representation so that we don't get the jackasses we have today.
So are any of you guys staying up-to-date on the little things here and there that *might* point to something more nefarious than just a random riot going on at the capitol?
There was one rep Tweeting out locations and updates on where they were/weren't once the building was breeched.
A democratic rep found that all of the panic buttons had been removed from her office, with no explanation.
Jim Clyburn said that a group showed up at his unmarked office and went through everything, rather than going through his things in the office that had his name on it.
Another rep saw people giving guided tours the day before the riots, and thought it looked out of place.
A bunch of little things that can very easily be dismissed or explained... but all together, they do kind of make you go "hmmmmmm"
*Insert obligatory tin-foil hat meme*
I have been as well. I listened to the FBI/US Att briefing yesterday and they alluded to public officials in their inquiries.
Personally my money are on the two QAnon ladies and Rep Biggs.
Lauren Boebert is really something. Multiple arrests, her husband was arrested for exposing himself to a minor.
Class act.
I have zero doubt she's packing and wouldn't go through the metal detetors for that reason. She put out a video that said she'd be carrying whenever she's in DC.
She filmed said video in an alley behind a townhouse that Dick Durbin and Chuck Schumer rented right around the corner from pubs and restaurants where congressional staffers hang out, which is surely a dangerous urban DC area.
Lauren Boebert is really something. Multiple arrests, her husband was arrested for exposing himself to a minor.
Class act.
I have zero doubt she's packing and wouldn't go through the metal detetors for that reason. She put out a video that said she'd be carrying whenever she's in DC.
She filmed said video in an alley behind a townhouse that Dick Durbin and Chuck Schumer rented right around the corner from pubs and restaurants where congressional staffers hang out, which is surely a dangerous urban DC area.
So are any of you guys staying up-to-date on the little things here and there that *might* point to something more nefarious than just a random riot going on at the capitol?
There was one rep Tweeting out locations and updates on where they were/weren't once the building was breeched.
A democratic rep found that all of the panic buttons had been removed from her office, with no explanation.
Jim Clyburn said that a group showed up at his unmarked office and went through everything, rather than going through his things in the office that had his name on it.
Another rep saw people giving guided tours the day before the riots, and thought it looked out of place.
A bunch of little things that can very easily be dismissed or explained... but all together, they do kind of make you go "hmmmmmm"
*Insert obligatory tin-foil hat meme*
I wonder what those two fine upstanding gentlemen are up to?