The Optimal Notre Dame Scheduling Model

Dizzyphil

Well-known member
Messages
4,094
Reaction score
1,541
That plus expanded B1G/SEC could make it harder for us as an independent to schedule that annual marquee home-and-home game too. Why would Ohio State or A&M play us when they’ll have more tough conference games and losing one to us could knock them out of the top 12?
With all due respect -

1. Why would said teams not think ND is as tough on their schedule as their conference foes?
2. Why end 'Great Game Match-Ups'.. i.e., Top Tier teams?
3. B1G/SEC are ALWAYS wanting to be on a Big Stage on National TV... so why not play the Irish?
 

Dizzyphil

Well-known member
Messages
4,094
Reaction score
1,541
to add.... A LOT of naysayers had WV beating ND in '88... I know I'm showing my age but - I was there in '73 - '78 when ND was two (should have been three) NCs and they were playing the best... freaking Army was a powerhouse then. As Holtz would say, 'Never judge the name of the team, judge the heart of the team'.
 

stlnd01

Was away. Now returned.
Messages
13,386
Reaction score
10,247
With all due respect -

1. Why would said teams not think ND is as tough on their schedule as their conference foes?
2. Why end 'Great Game Match-Ups'.. i.e., Top Tier teams?
3. B1G/SEC are ALWAYS wanting to be on a Big Stage on National TV... so why not play the Irish?
They would. That’s the problem.

If you’re a power and only play one or two other powers in your conference schedule, adding Notre Dame feels like a fun chance to add another big win for your CFP resume as an insurance policy if you don’t win the conference.

If you’re a power and you’re playing, say, three other powers in your conference schedule (bc the B1G and SEC have more big powers now), adding Notre Dame might seem like a risk you lose a third game and miss the 12-team playoff.

Or maybe not. It will depend on many things. But if the name of the game is “go 10-2” some schools will say why risk a loss when you don’t have to?
 

Dizzyphil

Well-known member
Messages
4,094
Reaction score
1,541
They would. That’s the problem.

If you’re a power and only play one or two other powers in your conference schedule, adding Notre Dame feels like a fun chance to add another big win for your CFP resume as an insurance policy if you don’t win the conference.

If you’re a power and you’re playing, say, three other powers in your conference schedule (bc the B1G and SEC have more big powers now), adding Notre Dame might seem like a risk you lose a third game and miss the 12-team playoff.

Or maybe not. It will depend on many things. But if the name of the game is “go 10-2” some schools will say why risk a loss when you don’t have to?
So... pussy out and you're ok... got it
 

stlnd01

Was away. Now returned.
Messages
13,386
Reaction score
10,247
So... pussy out and you're ok... got it
Currently watching a national championship game between two teams that played absolutely no one good out of conference. One P5 nonconference opponent between them. Pussying out works.

But looking forward, after playing Ohio State and 11 dwarfs this year, Michigan next year has Ohio State, Washington, Oregon and USC in-conference. (Also Texas but that was presumably scheduled before the Big 10 expanded.) Washington plays Michigan, USC, Penn State and Oregon.

With schedules like that, what's the incentive to add another nonconference opponent who can beat you?
 

Circa

Conspire to keep It real
Messages
8,000
Reaction score
818
Currently watching a national championship game between two teams that played absolutely no one good out of conference. One P5 nonconference opponent between them. Pussying out works.

But looking forward, after playing Ohio State and 11 dwarfs this year, Michigan next year has Ohio State, Washington, Oregon and USC in-conference. (Also Texas but that was presumably scheduled before the Big 10 expanded.) Washington plays Michigan, USC, Penn State and Oregon.

With schedules like that, what's the incentive to add another nonconference opponent who can beat you?
Because We are ND! Everyone's Super Bowl during the regular season.
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2025!
Messages
31,518
Reaction score
17,390
So... pussy out and you're ok... got it
Michigan is going to wind up with a championship using that model while a lot of traditional powerhouses were somewhat down this year. Makes me a little sick that we wasted the year with Alt, Hartman, Estime, etc by pussying out with an inexperienced OC that didn't know what he was doing.
 

irishff1014

Well-known member
Messages
26,513
Reaction score
9,288
Michigan is going to wind up with a championship using that model while a lot of traditional powerhouses were somewhat down this year. Makes me a little sick that we wasted the year with Alt, Hartman, Estime, etc by pussying out with an inexperienced OC that didn't know what he was doing.

Yup! Freeman fucked the pooch there. At least he has fixed it.

If we don’t win one in the next 3 years l don’t believe we will win one ever again.
 

NumbersGuy0520

Well-known member
Messages
960
Reaction score
1,344
There's no reason to assume that we wouldn't, but okay.
There’s no reason?

Idk man. I’m 32 and I’ve never seen a ND national championship in my lifetime. I joke to my wife that I’ll never see one, but as the years go by, you start to wonder…

Not until after next year, though. ND Natty tour 2024.
 

KPENN

Well-known member
Staff member
Messages
13,019
Reaction score
11,345
Has there been anything out there on the 12th game for next season?
 

Some Irish Bloke

Five foot nothin', a hundred and nothin'
Messages
6,346
Reaction score
5,922
Has there been anything out there on the 12th game for next season?
It has to be Stanford, right? They only have 11 games on their schedule as well. I guess I'm curious if they're working out the kinks of a new contract or if the two sides want to do away with the annual game?
 

rtrn2glory

Well-known member
Messages
16,173
Reaction score
6,457
Was that in discussion before or was that simply something brought up here?
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2025!
Messages
31,518
Reaction score
17,390
It has to be Stanford, right? They only have 11 games on their schedule as well. I guess I'm curious if they're working out the kinks of a new contract or if the two sides want to do away with the annual game?
I could see Stanford wanting the fuck out of our deal.
 

stlnd01

Was away. Now returned.
Messages
13,386
Reaction score
10,247
I could see Stanford wanting the fuck out of our deal.
Why? We probably sell more tickets than anyone else they play now except maybe Cal.
I don’t understand why we can’t just count Stanford as one of our annual ACC games though.
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2025!
Messages
31,518
Reaction score
17,390
Why? We probably sell more tickets than anyone else they play now except maybe Cal.
I don’t understand why we can’t just count Stanford as one of our annual ACC games though.
That's true, I was only considering the outcome on the field and not necessarily the financials. They should just count it as an ACC game, makes sense.
 

calvegas04

Well-known member
Messages
11,880
Reaction score
8,459
We should alternate Cal and Stanford, same area of CA and will change up the scenery stadium wise.
 

ulukinatme

Carr for QB 2025!
Messages
31,518
Reaction score
17,390
We should alternate Cal and Stanford, same area of CA and will change up the scenery stadium wise.
I brought that up in the General Team thread. There's been some talk out of USC's camp about possibly dropping us (Probably because the B1G is kicking their ass). Would suck to lose the USC rivalry, but the players would enjoy the annual trip to California at the end of the year regardless.

Now that Cal and Stanford are both in the ACC...I wonder if we don't get the ACC to add a provision where we play one or the other as our last game in November and it's an Away game? If we did that I guess that would guarantee us a Home game against the other, but maybe that would screw with ACC scheduling too much. Maybe the Home game would have to be against another ACC team?
 

Henges24

BUCKETHEAD
Messages
4,805
Reaction score
1,580
They need to just get rid of the conference championship games. Give their conferences some accountability in crowing their champion their own “BCS” way. Then you get rid of the automatic 4 bid & rely solely on the playoff committee to promote those spots.
 

BilboBaggins

Well-known member
Messages
880
Reaction score
1,320
They need to just get rid of the conference championship games. Give their conferences some accountability in crowing their champion their own “BCS” way. Then you get rid of the automatic 4 bid & rely solely on the playoff committee to promote those spots.
They should get rid of the NY6 bowl game's inexplicable monopoly on post-season venues. Just make them the conference championships already.

Rose Bowl: Big Ten Championship
Sugar Bowl: SEC Championship
Orange Bowl: ACC Championship
Cotton Bowl: Big 12 Championship

Then have all of the playoffs be at home venues except the National Championship, and move that around like the Superbowl.
 

Wild Bill

Well-known member
Messages
5,519
Reaction score
3,264
They should get rid of the NY6 bowl game's inexplicable monopoly on post-season venues. Just make them the conference championships already.

Rose Bowl: Big Ten Championship
Sugar Bowl: SEC Championship
Orange Bowl: ACC Championship
Cotton Bowl: Big 12 Championship

Then have all of the playoffs be at home venues except the National Championship, and move that around like the Superbowl.
College football games being played on college campuses? That's an interesting idea.

The greedy pigs in charge are too dumb to understand that it would be better for the sport and maybe it could generate more money for them in the future.

Playing at random pro stadiums in the regular season has lost its luster too. Play the game on campus where it belongs.
 

Henges24

BUCKETHEAD
Messages
4,805
Reaction score
1,580
College football games being played on college campuses? That's an interesting idea.

The greedy pigs in charge are too dumb to understand that it would be better for the sport and maybe it could generate more money for them in the future.

Playing at random pro stadiums in the regular season has lost its luster too. Play the game on campus where it belongs.
ND has showed its hand. Hence a reason I believe it will eventually help NIL.
 

NDpendent

Well-known member
Messages
2,011
Reaction score
6,337
I know I said this a few times in the past so sorry for beating a dead horse. I would love to see us do a annual game against a Texas team. Rotate between TexasAM, UT and Baylor (Catholics verses heretics for that one). Throw an occasional game in against Texas tech/smu/houston

Build Rockne's vision for California in Texas. Athletes are better there, untapped potential where we don't have as much brand awareness, there are actually a ton a Catholics in Texas
 

Te'o4Heisman

Well-known member
Messages
2,510
Reaction score
2,616
They should get rid of the NY6 bowl game's inexplicable monopoly on post-season venues. Just make them the conference championships already.

Rose Bowl: Big Ten Championship
Sugar Bowl: SEC Championship
Orange Bowl: ACC Championship
Cotton Bowl: Big 12 Championship

Then have all of the playoffs be at home venues except the National Championship, and move that around like the Superbowl.
The only argument against this would be that giving a team home field in the playoffs is a huge advantage that would be determined by the committee, unlike in the nfl or other sports where it is determined by definitive win/loss records. Would that impact how the committee ranks teams? It could get hairy.
 

pumpdog20

Well-known member
Messages
4,743
Reaction score
3,154
I like it, if it means we have to stay associated with the shitty ACC.
 
Top