ResLife Hero
Well-known member
- Messages
- 6,737
- Reaction score
- 190
Why TF does Stanford get every secondary member we want?
Is it the Richard Sherman effect? Last year it seemed like we were eating their table scraps at safety.
Why TF does Stanford get every secondary member we want?
Just what we needed facing Paul Johnson and Georgia Tech in week 3.
Ex-Stanford RB Kesley Young lands at Boise State, eligible in 2015
Stanford has had two graduate transfers this year (none in prior years). They have had only two undergraduate transfers in the last five classes (2010-14) !!
Five recruits have gone on missions from six classes (2010-15). Three of those five have returned to Stanford. The other two were from the Class of 2015.
Before any walkons are given scholarships, Stanford has seventy-seven players on scholarship, which is almost where USC is after their scholarship reductions entering 2015. Stanford has fifteen seniors in 2015 (without eligibility left) and eleven redshirt seniors. They may well have some of those who do not seek a fifth year.
Over the last six classes (2010-15), Stanford has given out 112 scholarships (counting the two that have left for missions), averaging 18.67 per year. Notre Dame has had 110 enrollees over the last five classes, averaging 22 per year.
2015 looks good for Stanford football (from the Stanford Daily)
Sometimes I read Stanford stuff and it just cracks me up. That article doesn't attempt to give any depth or critical analysis of the team. It's just "this guy is good. This guy is really good. This guy is pretty good." ... like honestly if you just gave me a roster with no knowledge of the team I could write that same article.
Truth is the only position group where they are better than ND is defensive line. And maybe TE.
Hoo boy, I don't know.
DE Aziz Shittu Sr- 19 tackles, 0.5 sacks
DT Solomon Thomas, RS Fr- He'll be good
DT Harrison Phillips, So- 9 tackles, 2 sacks
DE Brennan Scarlett 5th Sr- Cal transfer, 44 tackles, 2.5 sacks
DE Jordan Watkins, RS Jr- 0 career tackles
DE Nate Lohn, RS Jr- 1 career tackle
DE Dylan Jackson, Fr- 3 star
DE Gabe Reid, Fr- 3 star
73 career tackles and 5 sacks from their entire line--with half of that production coming from a transfer who hasn't played for them yet. They lost all three starters (Leuders, Parry, Anderson) in addition to 7(!) other bodies.
Since they're a 3-4 I guess you could add Henry Anderson. But still, their D-line is scary thin and almost completely unproven across the board---which is why they're bulking up Thomas and Phillips to ridiculous proportions just so they can have SOMEONE with size inside. It looks like their worst position on their roster by a fair margin.
Man, thanks for the perspective. I guess most of my opinion is based off hype and what I remember from recruiting. I had no inkling that they were that unproven. Though Aziz was showing flashes before he got hurt, and Thomas is supposed to be for real.
You think it's worse than WR, S, or RB though? I like McCaffrey a lot but outside of him their skill position players just seem rather ordinary. I also don't think Hogan is very good, and I think their OL is overrated but good. And they lost most of their good secondary players.
If their DL isn't better than ND's then I don't know if they have single position group that's better than what the Irish will roll out this fall.
I saw and am very happy.Stanford band banned from road games for the entire 2015 season.
Stanford band banned from road games for the entire 2015 season.
I saw and am very happy.
It's nice to see this shit happens at Stanford, too. Just a little reminder that ND isn't as snake bitten as we'd like to think sometimes.<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Stanford WR Michael Rector will be out for an unspecified amount of time because of a disciplinary issue. Shaw wouldn't indicate how long</p>— David Lombardi (@LombardiESPN) <a href="https://twitter.com/LombardiESPN/status/632745655480356864">August 16, 2015</a></blockquote> <script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
I don't know much about the depth of the Cardinal receiving corps, but I believe that Rector and Cajuste are the proven commodities. Hogan isn't much of a threat if he has no targets.
I don't know much about the depth of the Cardinal receiving corps, but I believe that Rector and Cajuste are the proven commodities. Hogan isn't much of a threat if he has no targets.
Trent Irwin will be an instant star. Best route runner in the Bay since Fred Biletnikoff.
Scarlett never came close to having a committable offer from us.
Truth is, Stanford and ND compete for a lot of the same guys but ND wins far more of the recruiting battles with Stanford where we're the top 2. Edwards and Alexander are the only guys in recent memory where we finished directly second to them. For example, Solomon Thomas was awesome but he was also never coming to ND. Usually this means there is something about ND that turned them off (location, religion, etc.) that isn't a turnoff about Stanford.