Did these people happen to mention a timeline? Are we talking this offseason? Some distant future? A phased approach?
I think this thread said that consideration was to be made this winter, and it was a five to six year approach.
Someone else said that something would be done this next season. What is the life of turf? Five or six years? And what is the payback in ND's case? I wonder if this could be an intermediate renovation? Between now and the final stadium, who's planning may require a special surface consideration. And I think someone said that the cost of re-sodding the field to play on again, in season was astronomical.
If they follow the model of the last stadium increase, there will be low interest, tax free bonds issued, sold and repaid over the next thirty years. The positive cash flow projections from this will be out of sight. So this is not an overnight fix.
I don't know if I heard this right, but there may be some interest in opening up the North end of the stadium, to allow Touchdown Jesus to be more visible. So there is a lot to offer many with this project.
I guess if everyone wants to talk about fancy one game uniforms, but the stadium is the inadequate or obsolete in
appearance the program isn't going to move forward. ND has the coaches, the Gug, the tradition, the backing, and the players.
If football is a religion [sic], it is about the alter. Building a 21st century program, requires keeping up tradition, but accommodating the future.
I have mostly questions. But I listen closely, and at the SC game I was lucky enough to be seated in a very good place to hear.