C
Cackalacky
Guest
I want to echo Redbar's sentiments as I am trying to reintegrate myself in the church but we have seen this before as you say Whiskeyjack:<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">1. Someone can't read, or else is lying for political ends. (I have a guess about which it is). In fact Barrett says the exact opposite. <a href="https://t.co/be1DIZDDIU">https://t.co/be1DIZDDIU</a></p>— Adrian Vermeule (@avermeule) <a href="https://twitter.com/avermeule/status/889839417757765633">July 25, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
Barrett's position is very clear-- if a Catholic judge cannot rule on a certain case without violating his or her conscience, then that judge should recuse himself; which most liberals should applaud. Durbin and Feinstein are implying that, as an orthodox Catholic, Barrett cannot be trusted to enforce laws as written. It's the same smear that was aimed at Kennedy and many other American Catholics before him.
Imagine a Republican congressman implying that a Muslim cannot be trusted to impartially uphold our laws simply because of his faith.
Trump and a latino judge because of his heritage
Donald Trump rails against judge's 'Mexican heritage' - CNN Video
Or
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jun/05/donald-trump-muslim-judges-face-the-nation
Last edited: