Politics

Politics

  • Obama

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • Romney

    Votes: 172 48.9%
  • Other

    Votes: 46 13.1%
  • a:3:{i:1637;a:5:{s:12:"polloptionid";i:1637;s:6:"nodeid";s:7:"2882145";s:5:"title";s:5:"Obama";s:5:"

    Votes: 130 36.9%

  • Total voters
    352

Whiskeyjack

Mittens Margaritas Ante Porcos
Staff member
Messages
20,894
Reaction score
8,126
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">He's running. <a href="https://t.co/ueGNeAp1EW">https://t.co/ueGNeAp1EW</a></p>— Michael B Dougherty&#55356;&#57155; (@michaelbd) <a href="https://twitter.com/michaelbd/status/867830639768285184">May 25, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

We deserve this.
 

ACamp1900

Counting my ‘bet against ND’ winnings
Messages
48,948
Reaction score
11,230
That dude sitting behind him is the most 'Harvard' looking thing ever...
 

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
How can the U.S. restore civility? This panel has some ideas (Billings Gazette)

“Civility is a habit. You have to enact it and perform it over and over again,” Boerboom said.

“In a rich, vibrant democracy, there’s an undertone of people getting along and trying to solve their problems,” Flanigan said, adding that her research shows that for some people, authentic communication — and not politeness — is most important.
 

connor_in

Oh Yeeaah!!!
Messages
11,433
Reaction score
1,006
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">He's running. <a href="https://t.co/ueGNeAp1EW">https://t.co/ueGNeAp1EW</a></p>— Michael B Dougherty�� (@michaelbd) <a href="https://twitter.com/michaelbd/status/867830639768285184">May 25, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

We deserve this.

He's pushing universal wage apparently
 

Bluto

Well-known member
Messages
8,146
Reaction score
3,979
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">He's running. <a href="https://t.co/ueGNeAp1EW">https://t.co/ueGNeAp1EW</a></p>— Michael B Dougherty�� (@michaelbd) <a href="https://twitter.com/michaelbd/status/867830639768285184">May 25, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

We deserve this.

That guy and our current bungling president are perfect examples as to why we should be taxing the living shit out of any individual income of over say 100 million and the estate tax should be 100% over anything of say 500 million in my opinion. That would allow a lot of poor kids and communities to have some "purpose".
 

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,705
Reaction score
6,006
That guy and our current bungling president are perfect examples as to why we should be taxing the living shit out of any individual income of over say 100 million and the estate tax should be 100% over anything of say 500 million in my opinion. That would allow a lot of poor kids and communities to have some "purpose".

You serious?
 

Bluto

Well-known member
Messages
8,146
Reaction score
3,979
You serious?

Of course. I do not enjoy the fact that a select few self styled masters of the universe from the multi millionaire and billionaire class and their upward failing offspring from both sides of the political spectrum have concentrated most of the power in this country in there hands. Do you? This would be a sure fire way to dilute said power. I would also prioritize poor kids having free breakfast and lunch as opposed to say Paris Hilton and those like her buying yet another sports car. That's just me though.
 
Last edited:

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,705
Reaction score
6,006
Of course. I do not enjoy the fact that a select few self styled masters of the universe from the multi millionaire and billionaire class and their upward failing offspring from both sides of the political spectrum have concentrated most of the power in this country in there hands. Do you? This would be a sure fire way to dilute said power. I would also prioritize poor kids having free breakfast and lunch as opposed to say Paris Hilton and those like her buying yet another sports car. That's just me though.

I'm perfectly fine with them having that money. I'd much rather they have the money that they and their family have earned than the government.
 

Bluto

Well-known member
Messages
8,146
Reaction score
3,979
I'm perfectly fine with them having that money. I'd much rather they have the money that they and their family have earned than the government.

So you're good with Donald bending you over because he has more money? That's an interesting position.
 

NorthDakota

Grandson of Loomis
Messages
15,705
Reaction score
6,006
So you're good with Donald bending you over because he has more money? That's an interesting position.

Yeah... I'm good with wealthy people spending THEIR money as they want to.
Telling people you are going to essentially limit their earning potential by putting a cap of X amount of money is pretty far left

I have never had a negative experience at the hands of the insanely wealthy. Not one of them has ever done anything to me. Besides, you try pulling that shit on them they'll just move their money elsewhere. No one in their right mind essentially hands their fortune over to the US government.

Bourgeois 4 life.
 

IrishLax

Something Witty
Staff member
Messages
37,545
Reaction score
28,995
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/06/lolas-story/524490/

Not really sure where to dump this, so I'll just put it here. I read this article yesterday in a bookstore as it was the cover story of The Atlantic and the title was way too intriguing to pass up.

It's very well written, it's also extremely problematic. I think it's definitely worth reading. This morning I Googled it and apparently everyone has a hot take on it... and they're all semi-legitimate, and come from a lot of different angles. One of the most interesting things is that there was an obituary written for the Eudocia Tomas Pulido in the Seattle Times many years ago that made no mention whatsoever of her being a slave... and the author of the article passed away before its publication.

Personally, I think every member of that family escaped justice and that's a shame. And beyond that, I had a lot of conflicted thoughts and I'm interested to see what other people have to say.
 

MJ12666

New member
Messages
794
Reaction score
60
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/06/lolas-story/524490/

Not really sure where to dump this, so I'll just put it here. I read this article yesterday in a bookstore as it was the cover story of The Atlantic and the title was way too intriguing to pass up.

It's very well written, it's also extremely problematic. I think it's definitely worth reading. This morning I Googled it and apparently everyone has a hot take on it... and they're all semi-legitimate, and come from a lot of different angles. One of the most interesting things is that there was an obituary written for the Eudocia Tomas Pulido in the Seattle Times many years ago that made no mention whatsoever of her being a slave... and the author of the article passed away before its publication.

Personally, I think every member of that family escaped justice and that's a shame. And beyond that, I had a lot of conflicted thoughts and I'm interested to see what other people have to say.

Agree 100%. I think the story is also just another example that immigrants do not automatically integrate into society just because they live here. If there is one situation as described in this piece chances are a there are a lot more.
 

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
Texas legislative session

Texas legislative session

From the viewpoint of a former "rising star" in the Texas Rep Party, an Hispanic, and others,

But for Villalba, with tough votes on sanctuary cities, transgender bathroom policy and abortion, “There have been more times this session when I felt icky when I drove home, just gross with what the body had done, that I never felt before.”

The last session was the most conservative in my experience, and this one was more conservative and comfortably so. It wasn’t a stretch. They were very much in their own skin,” said Bill Miller, a leading Austin lobbyist who represents interests across the political spectrum. “I tell clients: ‘We’re the most conservative state in the country. We’re a big, broad, diverse state, but we’re the most conservative state.’ ”

Straus attempted to draw the line on the bathroom bill, which would restrict bathroom use to biological sex as noted on a person’s birth certificate — what he described as a “contrived” answer to a “manufactured” problem, harmful, hurtful and entirely unnecessary except as a pander to the party’s primary base.

State Rep. Celia Israel, D-Austin, was dismayed when the House State Affairs Committee in April even “stooped to the level” of holding a hearing on the legislation.

When Israel tweeted on May 20, “Strong rumors #txlege #gop will finally get their ‘bathroom bill’ on house floor sunday,” she added “#miserablesession.”

“It’s been a miserable session,” Israel said this week. “I’ve talked to more senior colleagues — they’ve been here many more sessions than me — and I say, ‘Is this the worst one?’ and they say, ‘Absolutely.’

“Just the tension, the political tension between chambers, the fact that outside political interests seem to be exerting more force than they should, given their size of the electorate,” said Israel, who first won her seat in a special election in January 2014.

“That kind of fear about immigrants and bathrooms that took up too much this time this session, that’s what makes it miserable,” Israel said. “I want to work on transportation. I want to be able to support online voter registration. I don’t want to be the lesbian on the floor of the House, but there’s times I feel like I need to stand up and say, ‘This is not my Texas.’ ”
Texas must be a very dangerous place because the legislature feels "gun-free campuses are a magnet for murderers", school teachers and employees can carry guns, and laws are passed allowing guns to be carried in churches. The Gov recently went to the gun range and remarked that his target full of holes was a member of the media.

TEXAS LAWMAKERS ROLL OUT RELIGIOUS LIBERTY LEGISLATION

HOUSE BILL 421 -- THE CHURCH VIGILANTE BILL

Under HB421 there would be no background check, absolutely no security training and no financial responsibility in the form of liability insurance. Anyone could put on a uniform, badge and firearm and merely say "I'm a volunteer, so I'm exempt from all regulations."

Cries of "tyrannical government" under the guise of "religious liberty" are among the labels now attributed to current professional security regulations that make sure that the officers that patrol our neighborhood churches are adequately trained. State representatives are petrified of opposing the bill under the premise of fear of being branded as coming out against the safety of churches.

Despite all the work that needed to be done (over 4000 bills were introduced) and appropriations needed to be addressed, the Freedom Caucus derailed all the bills until they could get votes on a couple of issues.
 
Last edited:

phgreek

New member
Messages
6,956
Reaction score
433
From the viewpoint of a former "rising star" in the Texas Rep Party, an Hispanic, and others,


Texas must be a very dangerous place because the legislature feels "gun-free campuses are a magnet for murderers", school teachers and employees can carry guns, and laws are passed allowing guns to be carried in churches. The Gov recently went to the gun range and remarked that his target full of holes was a member of the media.

TEXAS LAWMAKERS ROLL OUT RELIGIOUS LIBERTY LEGISLATION

HOUSE BILL 421 -- THE CHURCH VIGILANTE BILL





Despite all the work that needed to be done (over 4000 bills were introduced) and appropriations needed to be addressed, the Freedom Caucus derailed all the bills until they could get votes on a couple of issues.


Couple observations...

1) The Bathroom issue is ridiculous. This isn't about the self image/identity a SMALL percentage of people have of themselves...this is about how we acknowledge them, their needs w/o marginalizing the MAJORITY of people. YES MOST people want to have bathrooms assigned by the plumbing you currently have. YES that is about their feelings of privacy, safety, and security when they are in a very vulnerable situation. People can pan that concern all the hell they want...but why is that LESS LEGITIMATE than being a dude who feels like a chick who wants to use the Ladies' room. Indeed this is a waste, and only an issue because people were intimidated into thinking they were some kind of "ist" for saying exactly how stupid this entire discussion is....and always has been.

2) The border issue is ridiculous. We should not have one moment of discussion about it...the law is the law, and until it is changed, any effort to undermine it is itself a crime. Again, people are intimidated by being labeled an "ist", and allow a movement/discussion to occur that is simply wrong....on on its face ridiculous. People want change...change the laws...and I wish them luck with that. The shit discourse and lack of trust and willingness to meet in the middle is, in part, due to underhanded, divisive tactics like labeling people "ists".
 

pkt77242

IPA Man
Messages
10,805
Reaction score
719
Couple observations...

1) The Bathroom issue is ridiculous. This isn't about the self image/identity a SMALL percentage of people have of themselves...this is about how we acknowledge them, their needs w/o marginalizing the MAJORITY of people. YES MOST people want to have bathrooms assigned by the plumbing you currently have. YES that is about their feelings of privacy, safety, and security when they are in a very vulnerable situation. People can pan that concern all the hell they want...but why is that LESS LEGITIMATE than being a dude who feels like a chick who wants to use the Ladies' room. Indeed this is a waste, and only an issue because people were intimidated into thinking they were some kind of "ist" for saying exactly how stupid this entire discussion is....and always has been.

2) The border issue is ridiculous. We should not have one moment of discussion about it...the law is the law, and until it is changed, any effort to undermine it is itself a crime. Again, people are intimidated by being labeled an "ist", and allow a movement/discussion to occur that is simply wrong....on on its face ridiculous. People want change...change the laws...and I wish them luck with that. The shit discourse and lack of trust and willingness to meet in the middle is, in part, due to underhanded, divisive tactics like labeling people "ists".

Where are you getting that most people want to have bathrooms assigned by the plumbing that you currently have?

Americans are divided over which public bathrooms transgender people should use | Pew Research Center

http://time.com/4698392/transgender-bathroom-bill-poll/
 

phgreek

New member
Messages
6,956
Reaction score
433
Where are you getting that most people want to have bathrooms assigned by the plumbing that you currently have?

Americans are divided over which public bathrooms transgender people should use | Pew Research Center

http://time.com/4698392/transgender-bathroom-bill-poll/

we could do this all night...

Transgender issue: Most people want bathrooms linked to biological sex: Poll - Washington Times

its still a ridiculous conversation...not warranting the energy it takes to post polls which are all likely inaccurate to the point of being meaningless

...make it a ballot initiative and watch what happens. Yes businesses and organizations can threaten to "hold people accountable"...but when they are at the ballot box...much like gay marriage...it won't go the left's way, and judges will decide...and now that won't go the left's way either.

If we care about those who are actually afflicted here, and not just about watching decent and reasonable people wrestle with another left bomb, we should make some accommodations...that is the decent thing to do...no question but NOT at the expense of the majority of people...
 

Whiskeyjack

Mittens Margaritas Ante Porcos
Staff member
Messages
20,894
Reaction score
8,126
The Week's Matthew Walther just published a couple of entertaining takedowns. The first is about Ben Sasse:

The Vanishing American Adult, Sen. Ben Sasse's slick new paean to hard work and old-fashioned middle-class American family values, is the most boring book I've ever read.

The Nebraska Republican is, if not absolutely insufferable, the least sufferable person in the Senate. (Keep in mind that this is a body that has historically welcomed the energies of Benjamin "Pitchfork" Tillman, in which creatures like Chuck Schumer and Ted Cruz are today permitted not only to contribute but to flourish.) Sasse is one of those "intellectual" conservatives for whom the answer to whether banks should be allowed to increase overdraft fees is to be found in the pages of Tocqueville.

In the last year and a half, Sasse has made a career branding himself as "the last honest man in the GOP," which is journalism code for someone who makes a lot of hay about Trump's character while inventing Principled Conservative reasons for gleefully implementing the worst parts of the administration's agenda. Were President Trump to consider governing like Trump the candidate and propose, say, a single-payer health-care program to be financed by higher taxes on the wealthy, Sasse would dust off his Madison quotes and fire off a few tweets about the erosion of our democratic heritage. Because Trump is actually just governing like a non-tweed-wearing version of Sasse himself, right down to his bombing of Syria, Sasse is allowed to continue his world-weary posturing. But really he is just a glorified tone-policer. Don't believe me? Try to find a single criticism of the president from Sasse that is substantive rather than stylistic (appropriately cautious-sounding procedural hang-ups about the nonsense Flynn scandal don't count).

For now, of course, Sasse is praised, described as "thoughtful" and "intellectually curious," fawned over in the pages of Mother Jones and Politico. But where does he think this is going to get him? Does he really believe that if the shoe were on the other foot his pseudo-intellectual version of outsider conservatism would win over union voters in Michigan, that the wearers of pink hats would not have the long knives out for the misogynist President Sasse?

But back to the book. I spend a lot of time with books that most people would find hard going at best. My favorite genre of literature is ecclesiastical history: Cardinal Newman's Arians of the Fourth Century has hardly left my bedside in three years. I once read the entire Chambers Dictionary from cover to cover. So when I pan Sasse's book as the most boring I've read, I'd like to think that I'm speaking from a position of some authority.

Embarrassingly for a self-described "historian" (the kind who did his Yale dissertation on Reagan) and would-be pedant, the second sentence contains a solecism: "Perplexed" followed by an infinitive is not idiomatic English. (One can be "perplexed" by something, not perplexed to it.) A few pages later we are treated to a harangue of some poor students at his former university who failed to erect a Christmas tree according to his specifications. The number of decorations at the top of the tree was insufficient. "'Was there not a ladder in the gym?' the vice president queried. 'Was maintenance unwilling to bring one?'"

The question is not whether anyone in fact actually talks like this (the verb inversion suggests that he has spent more time reading 19th-century novels than listening to conversations), but why anyone would think you could reach people by doing it. The anecdote, which according to Sasse was the inspiration for the book, sets the tone for 300 subsequent pages of tut-tutting, bad-faith admonition, and undisguised punching down. Despite his best efforts (he tells us more than once that his is not a "Get off my lawn"-type book), Sasse cannot avoid sounding like a tight-ass shift manager who makes a point of staring dolefully at his watch and passive-aggressively reminding you that you are back one minute late from your smoke break. With what cache of funds does he expect high-school students in a place like Flint to engage in "meaningful travel" as a substitute for popular culture? Does he want to persuade the TV watchers and junk-food addicts, the uneducated youth whose existence the book occasioned, or win plaudits from Washington Post bloggers?

I should say that condescending evangelical Christians who pride themselves on being debt free and pursuing meaningful hobbies probably have their hearts in the right place. The fact that millions of Americans are wasting their lives watching garbage on television and pornography and eating junk food is tragic. But has it never occurred to high-horse Republicans that three decades of neoliberal atomization, of untrammeled free speech and unregulated free markets, while very good for the partners at Boston Consulting Group, the first place this "historian" worked after becoming a bachelor of arts at Harvard, have been devastating for millions of Americans without the financial and intellectual resources available to them? If the poor have vicious habits, whose fault is it — theirs or the people who made fortunes encouraging and refining these habits with the help of international consulting firms?

All of which is to say that at the very least Republicans like Sasse need to start learning how to talk to normal people who are not Constitution fetishists or even middle class. Hint: The best response to a disgusting joke about the n-word is not to tweet about how you are a "1st Amendment Absolutist." The next time he sits down to compose one of his lachrymose open letters to his decadent countrymen in the hope of making sense of why we have President Trump, the junior senator from Nebraska should consider looking in the mirror.

And the second is about Mike Pence:

The National Catholic Prayer Breakfast, held Tuesday morning in Washington, D.C., is an annual confab founded in 2004 ostensibly to promote John Paul II's "New Evangelization" (these cloying neologisms are one of the less fortunate aspects of that great saint's legacy). I say "ostensibly" because the prayer breakfast is really just another appendage of what I like to think of as "Social Conservatism Inc."

I am not someone who makes a point of dumping on social conservative activists. For one thing, I agree with them that abortion is murder, that there is no such thing as same-sex marriage, and that the Little Sisters of the Poor should not be buying anybody rubbers. But as a Catholic I also go much further. For me, whether these sweet ladies or their insurers are cutting the check is a lame procedural question that cannot be answered with mere accounting tricks. The fact that contraception is even legal is wrong, and a judgment on the nation. (A winning platform, I know: Please cut the checks to Walther For President 2032.)

Baby steps are better than no steps at all, of course, and it is thanks to the tireless efforts of Christians of all stripes that procuring an abortion is virtually impossible in states like Kentucky and West Virginia, which are not exactly hotbeds of Catholic fervor. Some 80 percent of white evangelicals now oppose abortion. It was not always thus. For decades even Billy Graham took a moderate, conciliatory view; as late as 1997 he argued that "sincere Christians may differ on whether abortion is ever justified." His son Franklin comes closer to the Catholic position when he says that "God cannot bless a nation that embraces the murder of innocent children."

Though I am gloomy about the pro-life movement's prospects for the future, I am pleased that this coalition exists. What I am not pleased about is the prayer breakfast committee's scandalous decision to invite Vice President Mike Pence, a man who has publicly renounced the Catholic faith, to speak at a nominally Catholic event on issues pertaining to faith and morals.

You may be surprised to hear Pence — whom The New York Times calls "one of the country’s most outwardly religious and socially conservative legislators" — get thumped by a traditionalist Catholic. But Pence has renounced Catholicism. Why on Earth are Catholics asking him to stand for us?

My coreligionists who protest that it doesn't matter because he is faithful to the right causes are missing the point. To the devout, the only cause that matters is that of Catholic truth, ancient and undefiled. Schism is a mortal sin, one that endangers his immortal soul. Pointing this out is not bigotry or crotchetiness on my part, much less zealotry, in which I am shamefully lacking. I have friends and relations who have left the Church, people I love dearly. I do not subject them to daily harangues about their persistence in schism. But I would also never dream of asking them to hold forth in a public forum on religious questions. Sorry, not sorry.

Pence grew up one of four brothers who served Mass at St. Columba in Columbus, Indiana. The Pence boys were so experienced at the altar that even as college students they would receive phone calls from the rectory inviting them to vest up during their summer vacations. It was while he was an undergraduate at Hanover College that he found himself seeking "a personal relationship with Jesus Christ" (which is admirable, though it should be noted that as far as personal relationships go, literally eating someone is a pretty high bar to clear). According to Father Clement T. Davis, Pence's mother, Nancy, was despondent when her son left the Catholic Church and became an evangelical Christian.

Pence came of age during a period of crisis in the Church, the years of confusion and experimentation and indifferentism following the Second Vatican Council and the promulgation of the Novus Ordo Mass. Its fruits are everywhere in evidence: empty pews, a decline in vocations to the priesthood, the near-collapse of women's religious life, people taking Communion every week who have not been to confession in decades, ostensibly catechized adult Catholics who do not realize that the Mass is a sacrifice at which the priest asks the archangel Michael to carry his offering to Christ's altar in heaven rather than a tawdry historical re-enactment of the Last Supper with breaks for hand-holding and quaint little songs.

These trends are only now beginning to reverse themselves now at the hands of Catholics a generation or two younger than Pence. His story is one that could be told by any number of lapsed conservative Catholics in his age bracket (John Kasich, for example). That is why it was so strange hearing him at the prayer breakfast. He described himself with evident affection as "the son of two devout American Catholics" and noted how proud his mother would have been to see him on that stage. He joked about being "from a mid-sized Catholic family: only six children." And he spoke almost wistfully of the role that "the hymns and liturgies of the Catholic faith" played in his youth. "I stand before you today as Michael Richard Christopher Pence," he said, referring to his confirmation under the patronage of St. Christopher. Here my hair stood on end. Intentional or not, this sounded like a tacit acknowledgment of the fact that, despite his willful attempt at separation, he is still one of us.

Though we disagree about many things, I like Pence. He is my kind of politician, a charming, down-to-earth Midwesterner and a fundamentally decent man. Which is why I am praying that the vice president will repent and submit to the pope. I am worried about our vice president's immortal soul.
 

zelezo vlk

Well-known member
Messages
18,012
Reaction score
5,054
Something that seems impossible to believe but is depressingly true.

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Drug overdose deaths soar faster than ever & are now leading cause of death for Americans under 50. Think about that <a href="https://t.co/n9KQLGJsWw">https://t.co/n9KQLGJsWw</a> <a href="https://t.co/Yoztw7oLxc">pic.twitter.com/Yoztw7oLxc</a></p>— Mike Rosenberg (@ByRosenberg) <a href="https://twitter.com/ByRosenberg/status/872118209100390401">June 6, 2017</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
 

Legacy

New member
Messages
7,871
Reaction score
321
Legislature overrides Brownback’s veto of bill that rolls back his 2012 tax cuts (KC Star)

TOPEKA
The Republican dominated Kansas Legislature that has soured on Gov. Sam Brownback’s vision for the state voted late Tuesday to roll back the governor’s signature tax cuts.

Lawmakers voted to override Brownback’s veto of a tax plan estimated to bring the state more than $1.2 billion over a two-year span.

The Senate vote was 27 to 13, and the House followed by agreeing 88 to 31 to supersede the Republican governor’s wishes on the tax plan and force the changes into law...

Lawmakers marshaled together a coalition of moderate Republicans, conservatives and Democrats to overcome the governor’s opposition to seeing his landmark tax cuts, which have in large part come to define his tenure in Topeka, fundamentally come to an end....

Brownback denounces decision to kill his 2012 tax cuts, refuses to answer questions (KC Star)

Kansas faces a budget shortfall of $889 million by 2019. The Kansas Supreme Court in March ruled state education funding is inadequate.
 
Last edited:

wizards8507

Well-known member
Messages
20,660
Reaction score
2,661
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/EFf8wWejqeY" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 

connor_in

Oh Yeeaah!!!
Messages
11,433
Reaction score
1,006
Josh Kraushaar just published an article in National Journal titled "The Kids Aren't Alright":

This column rarely delves in*to in*ter*na*tion*al polit*ics. But Thursday’s shock*ing elec*tion res*ult from across the pond could carry big*ger long-term polit*ic*al im*plic*a*tions in the US than the im*pact of James Comey’s seis*mic testi*mony against Pres*id*ent Trump on Cap*it*ol Hill. Against all ex*pect*a*tions, Prime Min*is*ter Theresa May saw her gov*ern*ing ma*jor*ity dis*sip*ate, des*pite run*ning against a far-left Labor nom*in*ee (Jeremy Corbyn) whose plat*form was more Marx*ist than so*cial demo*crat*ic. Corbyn’s sur*pris*ingly-com*pet*it*ive show*ing was fueled by young voters, who ral*lied be*hind Labor by a whop*ping 34-point mar*gin (63-29 per*cent), ac*cord*ing to Brit*ish exit polling.

For all the fears of creep*ing na*tion*al*ism, it’s the grow*ing dis*con*tent of the mil*len*ni*al vote that’s been a con*sist*ent theme in re*cent West*ern elec*tions. Young voters are more will*ing to cast bal*lots for can*did*ates on the fringes, op*pos*ing the neo*lib*er*al*ism of the Clin*ton/Blair vari*ety and the na*tion*al*ist, anti-EU/pro-Brexit sen*ti*ment in*creas*ingly dom*in*ant on the right. Many young voters are re*ject*ing cap*it*al*ism en*tirely, at*trac*ted to rhet*or*ic prom*ising free tu*ition and a gen*er*ous so*cial safety net at a time when many are strug*gling to make ends meet. Nu*mer*ous stud*ies also show young*er voters are much more skep*tic*al to*wards the value of demo*cracy than their eld*ers.

It’s show*ing in the re*cent elec*tion res*ults from the US, France and now Great Bri*tain. A stun*ning 27 per*cent of French mil*len*ni*als voted for the Com*mun*ist-al*lied can*did*ate, Jean-Luc Melen*chon, in the first round of the coun*try’s elec*tion. He won more votes among mil*len*ni*als than any oth*er French can*did*ate on the all-party bal*lot. Ac*cord*ing to Bri*tain’s exit poll, youth turnout shot up by 12 points from the 2015 elec*tion, while giv*ing Labor nearly two-thirds of the vote. And back home, Bernie Sanders’ youth-vote dom*in*ance over Hil*lary Clin*ton in last year’s pres*id*en*tial primar*ies is surely a sign of where the fu*ture en*ergy with*in the in*creas*ingly-pro*gress*ive Demo*crat*ic party. Dur*ing the pres*id*en*tial primar*ies, Sanders drew more un*der-30 voters than Clin*ton and Trump com*bined.

To be sure, there are dif*fer*ent reas*ons for the youth’s drift to*wards the far left in the dif*fer*ent na*tion*al elec*tions. In France, an an*em*ic eco*nomy where youth un*em*ploy*ment is well over 20 per*cent is a prime cul*prit in mil*len*ni*al rad*ic*al*ism. In Bri*tain, the back*lash to Brexit (and to May’s re*la*tion*ship with Trump, to a less*er ex*tent) looks like the key driver for youth en*gage*ment be*hind the Labor Party, with the shock*ing res*ult of the EU ref*er*en*dum serving as a wake-up call. And in the United States, where the eco*nomy is re*l*at*ively de*cent, iden*tity polit*ics are a driv*ing force an*im*at*ing the Left.

But while it’s easy to un*der*stand the forces driv*ing young voters to the ex*tremes, it’s harder to un*der*stand how much they’re will*ing to tol*er*ate. Corbyn has been a lonely de*fend*er of vari*ous ter*ror*ist groups, and has been un*der fire for tol*er*at*ing creep*ing anti-Semit*ism with*in his own party. Melen*chon raged against the glob*al fin*an*cial sys*tem like a true French re*volu*tion*ary. Com*pared to these two, Sanders looks like a hardened tea party act*iv*ists.

How will this trend mani*fest it*self in Amer*ic*an polit*ics? It’s clear that, des*pite be*ing shut out of power, the Left could come back with a ven*geance in the next pres*id*en*tial elec*tion. With Trump deeply un*pop*u*lar and his ad*min*is*tra*tion en*meshed in scan*dal, it’s hard to be bullish about the Re*pub*lic*an party’s chances in up*com*ing elec*tions. And with the Demo*crat*ic party’s en*ergy in*creas*ingly on the left, it’s not hard to see them nom*in*at*ing an Eliza*beth War*ren-type as their stand*ard bear*er in four years—and pre*vail*ing.

Amer*ic*an polit*ics, for gen*er*a*tions, was fought between the cen*ter-left and the cen*ter-right—between the 40-yard lines of polit*ics. Trump ob*lit*er*ated that dy*nam*ic in last year’s elec*tion, and will likely fuel even more po*lar*iz*a*tion from the op*pos*i*tion. We could be wit*ness*ing grow*ing ex*trem*ism on both sides for years to come, with the fu*ture gen*er*a*tion only ex*ped*it*ing that de*press*ing pro*spect.

Holy crap....did you copy the syllable version? * * ** ***
 

Whiskeyjack

Mittens Margaritas Ante Porcos
Staff member
Messages
20,894
Reaction score
8,126
Holy crap....did you copy the syllable version?

Just a standard copy and paste directly from the article. No idea why it inserted so many *s. Gave up on trying to embed the article since I don't have time to edit them all out.
 

connor_in

Oh Yeeaah!!!
Messages
11,433
Reaction score
1,006
Just a standard copy and paste directly from the article. No idea why it inserted so many *s. Gave up on trying to embed the article since I don't have time to edit them all out.

Since it starts of about the kids aren't alright, at first glance, I assumed swearing!
 

zelezo vlk

Well-known member
Messages
18,012
Reaction score
5,054
But I know sometimes I must get out in the light
Better leave her behind with the kids, they're alright
The kids are alright

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
 

BGIF

Varsity Club
Messages
43,946
Reaction score
2,922
Josh Kraushaar just published an article in National Journal titled "The Kids Aren't Alright". TL;DR-- Bernie would have won.

We could be wit*ness*ing grow*ing ex*trem*ism on both sides for years to come, with the fu*ture gen*er*a*tion only ex*ped*it*ing that de*press*ing pro*spect.


Back in the last millennium when Reagan was governor of CA, his car got blocked in by a student demonstration. One of the students flashed a sign up against the read window, "WE ARE THE FUTURE!"

Reagan never at a loss for quick retort, scribbled on a pad then flashed it back at the demonstrator, "Then I'll sell my bonds!"

Those demonstrators have been cashing social security checks for the past 5 or 10 years.
 
Top