- Messages
- 37,546
- Reaction score
- 29,009
While not stated, I think he was referring to teams with decent offenses. None of those are that great.
The sentence in question I was specifically talking about bad offenses (where they do very well), and then contrasted that to how they get lit up by good offenses that have play makers specifically because their scheme doesn't translate to beating teams that can win 1v1 matchups. He's the one who quote tweeted me acting like it was some absurd thing to point out that they do very well against bad offenses... which is simply supported by results and facts over the past two years. Why are we still talking about something that can be proven by a simple Google search?
I've been there for all the Michigan wins of the last 19 years, so I've got a good track record there. I'm about 70/30 when it comes to USC, but I was there for the Bush Push unfortunately. Never been there for a Navy upset. I still have yet to see a win against BC though, and the only Michigan State win I've been there for was the improbable Tommy Rees game of 2013. We shouldn't have won that game on paper, but Tommy kept chucking it deep, and MSU's DBs in 1 on 1 kept committing pass interference. Most unique offense that Kelly has ever run 