phgreek
New member
- Messages
- 6,956
- Reaction score
- 433
I agree with everything you said in your post, the way this team played we were going to win this football game, my one concern and I don’t mean to take away from the joy of this huge win, but...
In a huge football game at night everyone comes out jacked up and ready to play especially in Notre Dame stadium, why we insist with a mediocre return game and a young sometimes one dimensional quarterback to start on offense all the time is beyond me. CJ gets tackled near the ten, three and out, punt to fUSC, they start in our territory...If they don’t fumble the snap, and complete one pass they are basically in scoring range. If they put up 7, maybe this game looks a lot different, although I agree we have a clearly better team this year. Just feel like you play with fire when you do this and give the opposing team the opportunity for huge momentum to start the game and to start the second half. That turnover changed the game without it?? Or against a better, gamer opponent??
Yea...I think that could have spelled a tighter ball game, for sure. CJ does some nice things but I have not been happy with his returns...KJ is a better choice. Playing with a angry steak right now....he is going to hit one up in there and break i if they keep using him.
You make a great point about always choosing the ball...as the defense seems to be pretty solid. The argument for deferring is at least approaching 50/50. In this game I would have wanted the ball first too because IMHO the ref. point differential is like 14 points...I want those points on the board just as fast as I can get them. Didn't go as planned, but they did get them quickly...and the refs, while funny at times, weren't ever a factor.....just the way I like it.