yankeeND
!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- Messages
- 4,607
- Reaction score
- 255
My vote would actually go to Urban Meyer, ha.
Well, even though that is subjective, just like me saying Saban is, it is a very fair argument and opinion. Meyer is exceptional at what he does.
My vote would actually go to Urban Meyer, ha.
So are we, and this is something of a down-year for MSU, and and up-year for us. Talk about glass houses.
They also got hosed against Nebraska so it evens out. Either way they should be 12-1...
I don't think you understand the word "factual" or the word "incorrect."
You first point has a hilarious amount of assumptions, and more importantly if you don't think Dantonio is in-home with Hayes and Corley saying "we're in the playoffs, we won the Big Ten. None of the other teams can say that." You're crazy. They have a clear-cut card to play over ND, OSU, and Michigan.
Your second point is quite obviously incorrect. A 2-loss MSU is not going to stay ahead of a 1-loss Ohio State that they barely beat. The reason a 1-loss Iowa stayed up where they did is because exactly that... they have 1-loss. Stanford is where they are strictly because they have the conference championship to hang their hat on.
Your third point isn't a point. So, yeah... good effort?
And they missed blatant OPI. We actually had the play covered, and then they trucked the DBs covering the receivers. So not only did they fail to get the play off, but then the refs let them cheat-code their way to a TD.
Not true, a 2 loss Stanford team is ahead of OSU, just as a 2 loss MSU team would have been ahead of OSU by virtue of their head to head win, ON THE ROAD. Was logic one of those life skills that you decided was optional? A 2nd loss in a conference title game that the 1 loss team didn't even make because they couldn't even win their side of the conference isn't going to trump a head to head loss on the road. I'm embarrassed for you. Also, that bland vanilla offense that you mention in point #2 isn't going to look very good against the best team in the country. When recruits wake up on January 1st and M$U got the snot beat out of them, making the playoffs isn't going to sell them to head to East Lansing.
Slightly out of context, but weren't you arguing the exact opposite like a week ago in favor of Ohio State? That the Buckeyes HAD blown out opponents even though they had really just gotten their double digit lead in the 4th?
Sorry if it wasn't you, and even if it was, I'm not really trying to call you out. Just noting inconsistences. When did you become a Big Ten fan? Haha
Sent from my XT1032 using Tapatalk
Well you said Dantonio was, and I disagree. Saban is the best coach in America. Don't get so defensive. Other people are allowed to have opinions too dude.
Yes, but Kelly can't coach and Dantonio is "Best Coach in America"
MSU won by 3 in Kelly's first year and hasn't won since. They lost by 18 points in '11, 17 points in '12, and 4 in '13. An average ND differential of +9. ND was their only loss in '13.
Dantonio's winning percentage against Kelly is 0.250 significantly worse than MSU's historical 0.370. Dantonio was 2-1 versus Weis.
MSU has replaced ND with the likes of Eastern Michigan, Wyoming, and Air Force.
Not talking about bad calls, I'm talking about once in a lifetime bullshit luck. The Nebraska (no) call was a hose job, but it wasn't dumb luck.
We're not where we are because of a miracle play. They are. Hardly glass houses.
Virginia.
Virginia.
Virginia.
I wouldn't say that was a miracle. It wasn't a hail mary or crazy play by any means. Just a long TD pass to win the game.
We were already in field goal range? I still don't understand people calling that a "Hail Mary" and the like. It was just bad coverage and a good throw on a normal play.
We talk about lack of talent, but recruiting is a big part of coaching as well. Dantonio is starting get some more high profile kids over the last two cycles. Will be interesting to see how he does with them. It may bolster him to the level that you hold him to go. I do think he is a great coach, but I just disagree that he is the best one. He is still making his case for that though, so we'll see.
Also, I don't think that head to head is the only factor for arguing who is a better coach, but I think it is a factor to consider. Whether you think that Kelly is a great coach or not, he has accomplished some great things in his time here. Maybe he is not the guy that will get it done, but he is the guy that turned us around and got us back on track.
Uh yah right. We were on our second string QB, on the 40 yard line. A 57 Yard FG is hard for the most seasoned FG kicker to make let a lone a freshman. And we scored with 12 seconds left... Thats as close to desperate as you can get.
Uh yah right. We were on our second string QB, on the 40 yard line. A 57 Yard FG is hard for the most seasoned FG kicker to make let a lone a freshman. And we scored with 12 seconds left... Thats as close to desperate as you can get.
Must be a boring Monday for many here...
Uh yah right. We were on our second string QB, on the 40 yard line. A 57 Yard FG is hard for the most seasoned FG kicker to make let a lone a freshman. And we scored with 12 seconds left... Thats as close to desperate as you can get.
Uh yah right. We were on our second string QB, on the 40 yard line. A 57 Yard FG is hard for the most seasoned FG kicker to make let a lone a freshman. And we scored with 12 seconds left... Thats as close to desperate as you can get.
Are you seriously comparing what happened in the UM/MSU final seconds to Fuller beating a DB on a deep route? Stop reaching, people.
It doesn't matter what we ND or IE fans think, the majority of the CFB world seems to think it, thus it becomes the narrative. In fact, if you ask around, I would bet that most people think we were as lucky as most people think State is.
It doesn't matter what we ND or IE fans think, the majority of the CFB world seems to think it, thus it becomes the narrative. In fact, if you ask around, I would bet that most people think we were as lucky as most people think State is.