You wouldn't know this, but I voted for several republicans in the last election. I know you have a bleeding heart liberal pictured, but I'm actually more of an independent. As Lax is as well. The conversation we had yesterday was how WaPo has stayed under the radar by sticking to facts, reporting accurately, etc. So we just found it funny that one day later, when negative message for conservatives is written, suddenly they are biased media trolls now too. That couldn't be further from the truth with WaPo. I mentioned that anyone that defied the right in media get killed by Trump followers. That "taking the high ground" gets you the same result regardless if you're reporting anything negative against Trump. Lax used WaPo as an example, and at the time, I thought it was a really good example. But unfortunately you proved me right. I urge you to actually read the article and tell us what's so sensational, incorrect or misrepresented in it. Because it's a well written article.
Actually I am not in the least bit shocked you voted for some GOPers. And bleeding heart liberal is not what I picture. But it is more fun when we're debating. IIRC you are in banking? If that's not correct I apologize, but it's what stuck in my mind for some reason. Anyway, early on the picture I had was Independent because you were a guitar strumming banker. That's a picture of conflict lol. I too consider myself an Independent, not a Neocon. My favorite candidate last cycle was Kasich. Trump was actually at the bottom with Hilary for me. Pretty fair chance I would have voted Berndog had Hilldog and the DNC not screwed him. Anyway, I will admit I liked the anti-government smell of Trump as I have disdain for status quo and DC in general. What ultimately tipped things for me was likely just the SCOTUS issue. Sad state of politics when one has to boil it down to just one thing. But yes, I felt, and still feel it's better than HRC.
When I said your politics demand it, I should have said your hatred for Trump demands it. That would have been more accurate.
Regarding the article,,,, I did read it, and we're going to disagree on the article, and that's OK. I feel it's OK to be proud of our Western beliefs, tradition, and history. Everyone has something to apologize for. Doesn't mean they can't be proud of the good. I'm tired of being told how bad the West is, and that being proud of it, or saying so only inflames Muslims or others. I feel the enemies of the Western World, and those with a secular agenda are contributing to the rot that is going on today inside the US. WaPo going after the symphony comment was just plain silly. The confederate flag comment, nothing but sensationalism. Trying to link him to King's comments, lazy.
I'm just tired of reading the same old tired retread stories. Capehart simply selected components of the speech he could sensationalize.
Capehart is a bonehead liar anyway. Not sure if you recall, he's the one that called Bernie a liar about attending a civil rights sit in. He was clearly proven wrong by other photos clearly showing that Berndog was indeed there. Does he retract or recant. Hell no. He goes on and publishes another anti Bern article.
edit/add - If WaPo was serious about taking the high road, they would boot dipshits like Capehart.