A few notes:
I bailed to my twin sister's house Thursday night since she's in a less flood prone area.
The power blinked a few times, but only enough to wreak havoc with the digital clocks on the stove, refrigerator, microwave, etc. I'm three blocks from the St. John's river and was told that my area was vulnerable to storm surge.
The sustained winds at the eye wall were in the 120 to 130 mph range. The eye moved a bit east as it crawled up the coast and was 35 miles off shore so the outer band winds and gusts were much lower but still damaging. Areas closer to the coast or on coastal islands fared better than feared, but still took a gut punch. Had Matthew jogged west rather than east it would have been a whole 'nother kettle of garbanzo beans.
My older sister's area didn't fare so well. Trees went down and they haven't had power since early Friday.
Don't downplay the dire nature of warnings and requests/orders to evacuate. They are not a "boy who cried wolf" scenario. They are "better safe than sorry" and "an ounce of prevention is a pound of cure."
I agree that the reporters and crews that hang out in dangerous weather to get "the shot" while demonstrating the "do as I say, not as I do" approach is an absurdity on top of an idiocy. I assume that there's a monetary incentive for being such damn fools.
Thanks Cack (good to know that you're safe and sound – at least physically) and BGIF for your thoughts. BGIF: I'll try to keep you posted.